VIDEO: ADL Suppression of Free Speech – “The Online Hate Index”

“The Online Hate Index (OHI), a joint initiative of ADL’s Center for Technology and Society and UC Berkeley’s D-Lab, is designed to transform human understanding of hate speech via machine learning into a scalable tool that can be deployed on Internet content to discover the scope and spread of online hate speech.”

For more information click here:

VIDEO: Israel Lobby & The NYC ‘Campus Pitch’

The Israel Lobby in the United States doesn’t hide its intention to influence US Foreign Policy via Jewish university students. Ask yourself a simple question — what other country in the world does this so flagrantly?!

The World Jewish Congress video descriptor:
“College students in New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Ohio, here’s your chance to bring change on your campus today! Pitch your idea for a campus event, strategy, or initiative that explores a new approach to supporting Israel, combating anti-Semitism, or promoting intercommunity/faith relations. WJC and the Consulate General of Israel in New York will gladly support you along the way: the winning student or group will receive a grand prize of $5,000. Apply now. We’re listening.
Click here for more information:”

VIDEO: Oh, The Hypocrisy! Dershowitz at UC Berkeley

Dershowitz neglects to bring up the “Jewish Privilege” — of course, if ones does, they will be immediately labeled an “Anti-Semite!!” Being the ‘eternal victim’ is required and a strategy Dershowitz, and his ilk employ. This is to keep the attention away from the core of the problem. Anti-Semitism is good for the Tribe at the end of the day as it allows them to retain their ‘protected status’.

BOMBSHELL: Zionist Report’s First Book – Challenge Your Knowledge

This is the first book we published. We strongly recommend you read it. You might think you know history, but this book will surprise you without a doubt. It will take you by the hand and clearly show you, true history. This is not just ‘another book’ it is a book that exposes events in an orderly fashion and will make everyone open their eyes!

Robert Kuttner

COMMENTARY: The Jewish Professor Plotting to Impeach Trump

What we see here is natural behavior by members of the Tribe – a ‘divide and conquer’ behavior meant to sow seeds to discontent to ultimately control the Goyim populace. And, even though Donald Trump is staunchly pro-Zionist, and toes the line of AIPAC and other elements of the Israel lobby, it isn’t good enough for individuals like Robert Kuttner. They adhere to their Talmud — after all, the Goyim are sub-human.

Robert Kuttner
Robert Kuttner

The Jewish professor plotting to impeach Trump,” Source:

Even before Trump had assumed office, a plot to impeach him was underway, led by Jewish professor (of Social Policy) Robert Kuttner.

A university professor called Robert Kuttner has begun his own effort to get the impeachment bandwagon rolling. He is trying to convene an ‘independent body of very reputable jurists and other blue-chip people’ to assemble a ‘running dossier of impeachable abuses’.

The dossier (a word that now resonates in Washington) would be given to the House Judiciary Committee if, as Kuttner hopes, it eventually convenes impeachment hearings. ‘You have to let him take office,’ he told me, echoing the Congressional aide’s analysis.

‘You have to see which of his actions that look like they are impeachable carry over into his actual presidency. The evidence has to accumulate… to the point that Republican members of Congress feel the need to put some distance between themselves and Trump… this is what happened with Nixon.’

Professor Kuttner is pinning his hopes on the emoluments clause of the US Constitution, which says office holders cannot receive gifts from foreign states unless Congress gives permission.

‘Trump is incapable of not mixing his personal self-interest with his duties as President. He just doesn’t have the impulse control to know how to do that.’


Kuttner is playing the long game, based on the example of Nixon.

It’s worth recalling the Nixon chronology. In two years, the idea of impeaching Nixon went from loony-left fantasy, to improbable, to inevitable.

May 9, 1972—before the Watergate break-in—my former boss, Congressman William Fitts Ryan of Manhattan, submitted the first resolution to impeach Nixon, House Resolution 975, mainly for the illegal bombing of Cambodia, other war crimes, and spying against American citizens.

The break-in occurred in June 1972. Woodward and Bernstein got busy that summer and fall. The Senate Watergate Committee did not start hearings until May 1973, and the official House impeachment inquiry only began in May 1974. It took time for evidence, public pressure, and political courage to build. Nixon finally resigned in August 1974, more than two years after the break-in.

In October 1973, when removing Nixon from office still seemed a fantasy, the ACLU’s Chuck Morgan published a book-length bill of particulars urging Nixon’s impeachment. It bore a remarkable resemblance to the eventual articles of impeachment nearly a year later.


Kuttner has previously said he is Jewish. (link)


COMMENTARY: Undermining Of The Christian Faith & Sucking The Life Blood Out Of Many Nations

Santa Claus has helped millions of Christians move away from the true meaning of Christmas. Christmas today is all about spending money, seeing family once a year, and pretending everybody is nice and happy and repeats the empty words of ‘I love you’ over and over again, when in reality, we have forgotten what true love really means. Love is not a once a year emotion, love is something that emanates constantly from the heart of a healthy soul and not something that we have to force ourselves to feel because it’s Christmas!  

We live in a plastic fake world where true goodness, true love and true respect for our families is something of the past. We have become self-sufficient creatures who have no other goal but to please ourselves, think of ourselves all day long, make a lot of money and maybe someday down the road we will think about the suffering of others. Is this a Christian value? or does it sound more like part of the evil brainwashing that the Jews have imposed upon humanity to destroy Christianity? The answer is pretty obvious. 


“Jewish Undermining of the Christian Faith & Jews Sucking the Life blood out of many Nations,” Source:

Jewish Undermining of the Christian Faith – By Willie Martin
I am not now, nor have I ever, counseled radical reaction against Jews. But, we do need an objective examination of what has happened in the modern church which has caused her to lose her power. Ask yourself. Where do the harmful influences come from which are destroying Christian America? Who are the people who protest the use of Christian symbols in public places (and now they are objecting to these symbols in privately funded areas) where, as a Christian nation, we have displayed them for hundreds of years? Who protests the use of a city park for an Easter sunrise program? Or protests the performance of a high school presenting the Messiah each year at Christmas? Who would deny your child the right to read his, or her, Bible in school during their free time? They can read some pretty violent comic books, or books from the school library depicting sex scenes, but God forbid if they read their Bibles. The Bible has been made verboten by one group only.

I dare you to read objectively the controlled news. If you decide to be objective, you will readily see that 90% of the complaints made against anything Christian, many of which are downright stupid, come from Jewish sources. Whenever you see an article in the news pertaining to some right-wing Christian action, nine times out of ten you will see a statement from some big-shot, Anti-Defamation League spokesman trying to explain that action.Yet this agency is anti-Christian, anti-American and an unregistered agent of a foreign country, operating illegally on American soil. Why is this allowed? Why does our government allow the A.D.L. to act as an unlicensed office of the Justice Department? They are the ones who are pushing for hate legislation while operating as America’s foremost haters and persecutors.

The attempt to take Christ out of Christmas and replace Him with Santa Claus is Jewish backed. The attempt to replace Christ with the Easter bunny during the Lenten season is another attack against what we have held sacred. It is not prejudice or bigotry when I state these facts. It is truth and you must recognize it as such. Ask yourself why is it allowable for a Christian to criticize most anyone else; Catholic, Mormon, Moslem, Buddhist, etc., but under no circumstances may you tell the truth about the Jews? Please don’t offer up that phony God’s Chosen People bit, or misapply Genesis 12:3 as the basis for your answer.

We have seen the sad spectacle in our colleges and universities of the radicals who have sought to disrupt our educational process. It does little good to attack these radicals when they are mostly immature youths. But, is it wrong to show that most of this social radicalism comes from Jewish sources, and that almost 100% of these radical college groups are run by young Jews from wealthy Jewish families? This acknowledgment comes from sad experience with them during the Vietnam War. See who it is that burns the American flag, or uses it to wipe their feet. Who is it that immerses an image of Christ on the cross in a bottle of his own urine? Why are a vast majority of the more than 40,000 Marxist college professors also Jews?

During the Vietnam War, I worked the college circuit as I lectured for the John Birch Society. I had 25 confrontations during that period with radical groups, some serious physical confrontations which included an attack against me at Kansas State University in Lawrence, Kansas, in April 1972. In 100% of these cases, these radicals were led by young Jews from wealthy Jewish families. Was there a reason behind this? I believed there was, and in the summer of 1979, I set aside all my scheduled activity to try and find out what that reason was. I went to Jewish sources to gather information and found that it was Jewish Higher Criticism, in both the church and school, which had been responsible for the destruction in our youth of a sense of respect for their Christian heritage of freedom. Additionally, I learned it was the Jewish revolutionary social doctrine which went hand-in-glove with Higher Criticism which was bringing about the long-planned Jewish social revolution. These two ideas cannot exist apart from each other as they are mutually dependent, and they are the fulfillment of Talmudic teachings which seek to split the goyim society by means of ideas.

Verification of this plan can be seen in the writings of the Jewish author, Marcus Eli Ravage, in the January 1928 issue of Century Magazine. I quote:

We Jews are at the bottom of nearly all your wars; not only of the Russian Revolution, but of every other major revolution in your history … We did it solely with the irresistible might of our spirit, with ideas and propaganda.

Oscar Levy, another Jewish writer, in the preface to the book, The World Significance of the Russian Revolution. said:

There is scarcely an event in modern Europe that cannot be traced back to the Jews. We Jews today are nothing else but the world’s seducers; its destroyers; its incendiaries; its revolutionaries.

The Jewish Chronicle, a leading Jewish newspaper in the United States, in its April 4,1918, issue stated:

there is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism (the forerunner of Communism, Ed.) are consonant(in agreement with, Ed.) the finest ideals of Judaism (Talmudism, Ed.)

The American Hebrew, the leading Jewish newspaper in the United States in 1920 said:

What happened in Russia shall also, through the same Jewish mental (Talmudic, Ed.) and physical forces, become a reality over all the world.

The Christian world has known of these threats ever since Jewish radicals in Thessalonica (see Acts 17:6) hauled Jason and other Christian leaders before the civil authorities, accusing them of “turning the world upside down.”

The Jewish system of procedures, or Talmudic System, is known by educators and seminarians, yet such is the power of the Talmudists, that few are willing to put forth a warning of the destruction which awaits a sleeping Christianity.

The Talmudic principle is simplicity itself. First, secularize and humanize the public schools. Prepare the mind of the goyim children to accept one-world propaganda. This can be vividly illustrated by a teacher’s handbook, published by a radical Jewish child psychologist by the name of Paul Brandwein. In its opening statement, Brandwein said: Remember every child comes to school insane because of what they have learned at home and in their church. It is your task as teacher to heal this insanity and prepare the child to become one of the international children of the future.

This book was in the Texas school system for a short time, but due to the efforts of the Mel Gabler family, it was removed.

Ask yourself why it is that in our public (government) schools much is made of “Black Studies Week,” while much of the history that points to the white Christian heritage of America has been withdrawn? Could it be that one principle being used is to discourage our culture of patriotism, love of country and its connection to the Christian faith? This is the liberalism which is applauded by Jewry, the Jewish-controlled labor unions, the National Education Association and many of our clergy and politicians. One of these boldly declared: If the Jews can get away with it, more power to them. If the Jewish idea is stronger than that of the Christian, let it win!

This is how Christian nations are destroyed! And, the fight is not being waged fairly. How can children, or their parents, make proper judgments regarding the best course of action for their families, or their nation, when the media which is filling their living rooms daily with trash and lies, is under the control of the very enemy they have need to fear. The great ideals of Christian Anglo-Saxondom are kept from white people under the guise that these ideals constitute “racism.” It is not a fair fight when our white Christian youth are offered Jewish-Talmudic ideas and ideals in place of Christian American ideas and ideals. Let the Anglo-Saxon heritage of our people have free course among their Anglo-Saxon sons and daughters and we will see Christian ideas and ideals triumph 100% of the time. This is why there is such an intensive drive on the part of world Jewry to keep the truth from our white Christian people.

It was Judaism that began this struggle. They invaded this fair country, not in order to make it a better place to live, but for their own gain. Let no man or woman of the white race fear them. But let this fight be fought on a fair basis. That is all that will be necessary for the truth to triumph! We need not fear world Jewry, or the evils of Talmudism, as long as our people are allowed to know the truth.

Today, our white society is confronted over and over again with the horrid term,  “anti-Semitism.” Yet there can be no such thing unless “Semitism” first exists. The Jews love to complain how they were forced by Christians to live in the ghettos of Europe, yet the ghettos were a Jewish invention! The Jews have always desired to separate themselves because they have always despised Christians. They are taught by The Talmud, that “contact with the goyim contaminates them.”

Yet strangely enough, it is not the Gentile who says that Jewish Talmudism is incompatible with white Christianity. This separatism is practiced by the Jews themselves! The Jew looks upon the Christian as a “Johnny-Come-Lately,” and since Americanism is of Christian origin and invention, they are taught to despise it. The idea that America was founded as a Republic is repugnant to the Jewish mind so they have set about to change us into a socialist, democratic welfare state with them in control, of course.

The Jew from the earliest times had gloried in religious persecution. It is the thing which has kept their hatred alive, and the brainwashed minions of Christianity have aided them in their deception. In his book, Israel’s Final Holocaust, Baptist Evangelist Jack Van Impe says that the Jews have been persecuted throughout history because they were “God’s chosen people and Satan hated them.” But this is not true! Scripture and history prove otherwise. Jews have been run out of every country in Europe, not because of their religion in itself, but because of their unscrupulous use of usury and their immoral practices. There is no religious persecution of Jews in America. There is religious prejudice brought about by the intolerable Talmudic resentment for everything non-Jewish and practiced by Jews against Christians. If the truth concerning Talmudic teachings were made known to the majority of Christians, the Jews would be forced to leave America.

Religious prejudice is totally contrary to Anglo-Saxon genes. We have always regarded a man’s religion as a matter of conscience and allowed others to believe as they will as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. This has always been an integral part of the American dream. But it is interesting to note that the cry of “bigot,” in America is raised by the very people who are the world’s worst bigots, the Jews.

One of the world-wide undertakings of the Roman Catholic church which has received world-wide acclaim from Catholics, Protestants and even non-Christians, has been the magnificent Passion Play of Obberramagau. Hundreds of thousands flock to view the depiction of Christ’s passion. Yet the Jews see this as a vicious, anti-Semitic plot against them and have forced the directors to change portions to conform, not to the truth, but to Jewish demands.

Yet recently when a blasphemous movie was filmed in Hollywood under the direction of the Jew, Lou Wasserman, entitled The Last Temptation of Christ, and Christian anger rose to a new height against this blasphemy, Wasserman went to Jerry Falwell, then head of the Moral Majority, asking him to temper Christian protests. When Falwell suggested to this Jew that they remove the movie from the market, Wasserman reacted with anger. Many of the liberal pulpits of America praised this anti-Christ Jewish movie which made our Lord out to be a whoremonger. This is the Talmudic mentality.

There is no politician in recent years who has been able to give evidence of his Christian faith without coming under Jewish attack. As early as June, 1921, the Jewish press in America raised a clamor when it stated that Christian churches were not competent to teach Americanism because the churches held that Christian teachings and good citizenship were synonymous.

The parallel between the Protocols and Talmudism is so pronounced that world-wide Jewry believes in the common Jewish prophecy that “Christianity is doomed to perish.” Or, as one communist leader said, “We will banish God from the skies.” If Christianity should perish, it will be because it becomes Judaized as is happening in a majority of our churches.

Have you ever wondered why with 45-million born-again Christian Americans, according to their own estimates, our beloved country has been sliding into hell at a faster rate in the past fifty years than at any time in our history? Could it be that these professing Christians are the “salt which has lost its savor” which the King talks about in Luke 14:34-35? He said: Salt is good: but if the salt has lost his savour (its ability to act as salt) wherewith shall it be seasoned? It is neither fit for the land, nor yet for the dunghill (garbage dump); but men cast it out…

The main characteristic of salt is to stop corruption. Too much salt when making bread stops the action of the yeast. Remember back before the days of the deep freeze, when we salted our meat to preserve it? When salt loses this property, it is good for nothing. How many Christians do we see these days who fit this characteristic? When you find Christians who have lost their salt, you will find he or she has probably come under the influence of Judaism.

Throughout all of this, remember one thing: It is the “Jewish idea,” the  Talmudic teaching which is the question at issue. It is not the Jewish people themselves.

Jews Sucking the Life blood out of many Nations..

For over 1700 years, the Jews have bewailed their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning.  Why? Because they are vampires and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live among themselves. They must subsist off Christians and other peoples not of their race.

If we do not exclude them from these United States in the Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such numbers that they will dominate and devour the land, and change our form of government for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty!

Jews, gentlemen, are Asiatics, let them be born where they will, no matter how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American’s and will not, even though they live among us for ten generations. A leopard cannot change his spots. Jews are Asiatics and are a menace if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention.

For many years, this speech was found among the diaries of Charles Cotesworth Pickney, of South Carolina, who attended the Constitutional Convention as a delegate. Then mysteriously, it disappeared from the Philadelphia City Museum in the 1930’s and all references to it were withdrawn. Immediately, the Jewish leaders in America gleefully pounced on this as proof that the “Franklin prophecy” was a forgery, just as they said the same for The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. The Communist Rules for Bringing About a Revolution, and The Communist Textbook on Psychopolitics. (I have this latter book available for $2.50 pp.)

But whether Franklin’s prophecy was fake or not, regardless of whether it was an elaborate hoax, what he foresaw has come to pass. It is a painful fact!

If Benjamin Franklin was alive today, you can be assured that he would be in the forefront of those who are trying to save this Christian nation from Talmudic control. White Christian Americans must remember this fact, for it is all important to our survival! The Talmudists are not the cause of our overwhelming problems. They and the aliens in our midst, are merely the effects of Israel’s disobedience. (Deuteronomy 28 will graphically explain it to you.) When Israelites become more concerned with “doing their own things,” than in obeying their God, we can expect these things to happen. In Jeremiah 22:21 we read: I spake unto thee in thy prosperity; but thou saidst, I will not hear. This hath been thy manner from thy youth, that thou obeyest not my voice.

In Deuteronomy 28, we get a clear picture of what will happen to Israel if they obey their God. But, beginning with verse 15, we read dire warnings of the price we will pay for disobedience. Think about Korea and Vietnam, as you read verse 25: The Lord shall cause thee to be smitten before thine enemies: …. In both of these wars, we were whipped by nations smaller than most of our states. We did not have a “peace with honor” in either of them, no matter what charlatans like Henry Kissinger said to the contrary.

Verse 33 continues: The fruit of thy land, and all thy labours, shall a nation which thou knowest not eat up;… (Emphasis added)

Think about this as you ask what has happened to our strategic food supply since 1985. We have none now. In case of a national emergency this nation would be hungry in less than thirty days.

In verses 43-44 we read: The stranger that is within thee shall get up above thee very high and thou shalt come down very low … he shall be the head, and thou shalt be the tail.

Ask yourself what has happened to Anglo-Saxon leadership in America in the last fifty years? Who controls our economy? It is not our own people. America’s economy is at the mercy of International Jewish Banking families, eight of them in this order:

 1.   ROTHSCHILD BANK of London and Berlin 2.   LAZARD BROTHER BANK of Paris


4.   WARBURG BROTHERS BANK of Amsterdam and Hamburg

5.   LEHMAN BROTHERS BANK of New York City

6.   KUEHN-LOEB BANK of New York City

7.   CHASE MANHATTAN BANK of New York City (As you know, Chase  Manhattan is
controlled by the international Rockefeller interests.)

8.   GOLDMAN-SACHS BANK of New York City

Each of these banks is Jewish controlled and today approximately 300 Jewish businessmen who are closely associated, often by intermarriage, control the money system of the world. They control an interlocking, international banking cartel of unimaginable wealth and power which has stolen billions of dollars from the American taxpayer since the Federal Reserve Act became law in 1913. All by the application of Talmudic banking practices.According to Theodore Hertzl, father of modern Zionism, the Talmudic question arises whenever Jews appear because they bring it with them. It is not their large numbers which causes the problem, but their Talmudic business principles and practices of which they love to boast. We will see when we get into The Talmud itself how these Jews are allowed by their own laws to cheat any goyim with a clear conscience.

Jewish power has become so strong in America that we see a turning away from the Christian principles of our founding fathers to the heathen philosophies of Babylonia.  This is being accomplished by Jewish propaganda. The Jews have always been known as “propagandists.” They initiated the idea of brainwashing, or thought control as it is more accurately titled. This was the technique used against our fighting men in Korea and Vietnam, it is being used to seduce millions of youth in our government schools, and it is used in e Judeo-Christian churches of this nation. These are not Christian ideas, or American ideas, but the ideas of a heathen, alien philosophy which is contrary to everything we say we believe in as Christians.

The Talmudists insist over and over again that they “gave us our Scripture,” “gave us our God,” “gave us our religion,” and gave us our Savior!” None of the claims are valid since none of these things have a Jewish origin.

Few Jewish leaders claim any spiritual mission for Jewdom. Theirs is a mission to control a one-world government under the wise men of Jewdom. As far back as 1881, a Jewish spokesman, Goldwin Smith, professor of Modern History at Oxford University, boastingly said:  We Jews regard our race as superior to humanity, and look forward, not to its ultimate union with other races, but our triumph over them.

In 1858, the head rabbi of Europe stated:

Wars are the Jews harvests, for by them we kill off the Christians and harvest their gold. We have already killed a hundred million of them, and the end is not yet!

This was before the inter-family American Civil War and the fratricidal WWI and WWII. Samuel Roth, a noted Jewish author, stated to a fellow Jew:  We came to the world pretending to escape persecution, and we are the most deadly persecutors in all the wretched annals of man.

In The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion which I have mentioned before and which the Jewish world calls a forgery, we read in Article II, Par. 5: … Through the press we gained

… Through the press we gained power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade; thanks to the press, we have the gold of the world in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather it out of oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us, though we have sacrificed many of our own people. Each victim on our side is worth, in the sight of God, a thousand goyim.

If an intelligent being from another planet were to visit this world, they would react with shock if they were told that the greatest source of strength of our enemies rested in, and emanated from, the Christian church. Thinking Christians should read I John 2:22-23 which provides a perfect word description of an anti-Christ. This description fits the Talmudists more closely than any other group on the surface of this planet. Then in II John 10 and 11, we are told that anyone who gives these anti-Christs aid and comfort in any way, even by word of mouth, “becomes partakers of their evil deeds.” The Babylonian Talmud calls our Savior and King, Jesus the Christ, an “illegitimate bastard,” (SANHEDRIN, 67a). In another place it says that Christ is the “illegitimate son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish prostitute named Mary, and that he was conceived during menstruation.”

How in God’s name can those who go by the name of Christian support those who by their own admission are anti-Christs, who hate everything Christians are supposed to stand for and who openly advocate the destruction of the same? If the libraries in our seminaries were required to identify the books which were written by anti-Christ Jews, there would be a drastic reduction in those pastors who have been brainwashed by the equally brainwashed seminarians. The fiction that Abraham, Isaac and Jacob were Jews will not stand up to even the scantest Biblical research any more than the words of Genesis 12:3 pronounce a curse against anyone who takes a stand against these evil people.

One of the pressing issues in the Christian world today should be an effort to liberate our white Christian people from what the Scriptures call, “Fear of the Jews.” The pastors of our churches should be required to tell our people the truth that the Jews today are not Israelites, and that most certainly they are not all of Israel. This is readily proven by the obvious conclusion that they do not carry any of the fingerprints necessary to establish their claim. Following are but a few of the Scriptural fingerprints of Israel:

     1.   Israel was to glorify Jesus the Christ, Messiah, who was prophesied by the Hebrew prophets. Do the Jews demonstrate this glorification?     2.   Israel was commissioned by Jesus the Christ to carry the message of God’s salvation to all men, everywhere (Matthew 28:18-20). For centuries, who has carried out this commission? The Anglo-Saxon,. Celtic and Scandinavian peoples. At any time since the birth of Christ, have the Jews witnessed to anyone of God’s salvation through Jesus?

3.   Israel was to lose her identity as a people after God divorced them. They were to be scattered among the nations and forget who they were. (Hosea 1:9-10) Have the Jews ever lost their “identity?” Even though most Jews today are of Turko-Mongol racial extraction and have no racial heritage to the tribes of Israel, they never stop shouting from the housetops that they are the “Chosen Ones.”

4.   Israel was designated by God to be a Holy People because they were His servants. They were to spread the word of God, His kingdom and His salvation. The Jews certainly boast of being a “holy people,” and a “superior people,” they never admit to being servants.

5.   Israel was to bring forth Kingdom fruits. The Anglo-Saxon peoples have, in varying degrees, been exhibiting these fruits. Can we point to a time in the centuries  since the Christ where the Jews have done so?

6.   Israel was to become known as “Sons of the Living God” following their captivities and dispersion among the nations. Born-from-above Anglo-Saxons have this distinction. The Jews have never been known by this description.

7.   Israel was to become a “company of nations,” and a “great nation.” The United Kingdom and America certainly fulfill this prophecy. While the Israelis can today claim to be a powerful military force in the Middle East, it is only because America has pumped in billions of dollars and resources to keep it afloat. Even their leaders admit that if we withdrew our support, they would collapse. Reaching back into history from the time of Christ, where have the Jews ever been a “great nation,” or a “company of nations?” History is silent.

8.   Who are known as Isaac’s Sons, or Sax-sons? Certainly not the Jews.

9.   Israelites were to be great colonizers, taming the vast wildernesses and establishing colonies which became nations wherever they went. The Jews have been a scourge to all nations wherever they went and, in many cases, those nations expelled them. They were not hated for “His namesake,” but for their Talmudic practices.

Does your pastor teach that the Jews comprise all of Israel? The truth is, they are not even a part of it! If you would like Scriptural and historical facts to support this statement, write for my books, The Mystery of True Israel. $7.50 pp and Who Are the Jews?. $2.50, pp. I challenge you to read these two books, compare them with Scripture and history, and discover for yourself what the Bible really says about the Jews as it contrasts with the teachings of your pastor.As mentioned earlier, the flaccid, milquetoast condition of most American Christian churches was not brought about by science, or by scholarship, but can be traced to German-Jewish Higher Criticism. This trend in thinking became popular during the nineteenth century when it was believed that to have a full-rounded theological education, one must attend a seminary in Europe. The defenders of our Bible and the Christian faith have been sadly handicapped in the defense of their faith because they have not been shown the origin and purpose of the Talmudic Jewish attack against Christianity. It was not a Christian attack, nor a German attack, but a Talmudic Jewish attack perfectly tuned to Talmudic teachings which were not discussed by Dr. Neusner in his book about The Talmud. In fact, he was very careful to avoid reference to them.

The majority of economic and social mush which comes from our pulpits today was prepared by Jewish professors who have infiltrated most Christian seminaries, even those of the evangelicals and fundamentalists. It is no wonder that concerned Christians refer to these apostate schools as “religious cemeteries.” Very little comes out of them except Talmudic corruption. If there is any place where the Jewish question should be honestly approached it should be in the Christian church. Instead, in their “approved blindness,” they are often champions of the very enemies who have taken an oath to destroy them.

Oberlin College, USA

Oberlin Fires Anti-Semitic Professor Who Said Jews and Israel Were Behind ISIS and 9/11

If you dare to speak the truth on Israel, on a university campus, be prepared to lose your job and never find another one in academia again. No longer are universities grounds for thought and real debate. They are now centers of indoctrination, brainwashing, social engineering, and cultural marxism.

Oberlin College, USA

“Oberlin Fires Anti-Semitic Professor Who Said Jews and Israel Were Behind ISIS and 9/11,” Source:

Yesterday evening, after a lengthy investigation, Oberlin College officially dismissed Joy Karega, a non-tenured professor and writing instructor who had moonlighted as a purveyor of anti-Semitism online. Among other outlandish exploits, Karega had shared material on Facebook accusing Israel and Jews of being behind ISIS, 9/11, and the Charlie Hebdo attack. She also infamously posted a meme in which Jewish banker Jacob Rothschild is shown proclaiming, “We own your news, the media, your oil, and your government.”

Initially, Oberlin was slow to respond to Karega’s bigotry. When first informed of it by a concerned alumni group back in January 2015, the college’s administration sat on the information until it was exposed by the media a month later. After the story broke, it took an intervention by the school’s board of trustees to jolt the college leadership into confronting Karega’s conduct. Finally, in August 2016, Karega was placed on paid leave, pending an investigation.

That investigation has now concluded with Karega’s dismissal. As the college noted in its letter announcing the move, Karega had been unrepentant and “disclaimed all responsibility for her misconduct.” In fact, as Tablet has reported, the social justice writing instructor continued echoing anti-Semitic content on Facebook even while under investigation.

While it is reassuring that Oberlin’s administration ultimately came to the obvious conclusion regarding Karega, the campus’s general conduct toward anti-Semitism has been less so. To begin with, as Tablet reported, Karega was hired by a small search committee that included two of Oberlin’s associate deans, all of whom failed to recognize her bigotry, despite the fact that they were vetting her to instruct undergraduates in social justice. There appears to have been no inquiry into how this transpired.

Equally troubling is the fact that even after Karega’s bigotry came to light, the school’s Student Senate condemned criticism of her as a “witch hunt.” That the student leadership of a liberal college campus in 2016 would be tougher on those fighting anti-Semitism than on those promoting it is simply shocking, and suggests a basic failure of moral education. This conduct should not be surprising, however, given that Jewish students at Oberlin have told reporters that they are afraid to speak on record about campus anti-Semitism for fear of opprobrium from their peers. There appears to be no effort at Oberlin as yet to address these deeply disturbing developments.

Last May, Tablet’s own reporting found that anti-Semitic assumptions about Jews and conduct towards them at Oberlin dated back decades, long before Karega set foot on campus.

The college’s dismissal of Karega is a good start, then, but the school still has a lot more work to do if it wants to present itself as a safe space for Jews.

Oberlin’s letter on Karega’s dismissal is reproduced in full below:

The Oberlin College Board of Trustees, after extensive consideration and a comprehensive review of recommendations from multiple faculty committees and Oberlin President Marvin Krislov, has voted to dismiss Assistant Professor of Rhetoric and Composition Joy D. Karega for failing to meet the academic standards that Oberlin requires of its faculty and failing to demonstrate intellectual honesty.

The dismissal is effective Tuesday, November 15, 2016.

As a Board, we agree with President Krislov and every faculty committee reviewing this matter that the central issues are Dr. Karega’s professional integrity and fitness.  We affirm Oberlin’s historic and ongoing commitment to academic freedom.

During this process, which began with Dr. Karega’s posting of anti-Semitic writings on social media, Dr. Karega received numerous procedural protections: she was represented by counsel; she presented witness testimony, documents, and statements to support her position; and she had the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses testifying against her.

The faculty review process examined whether Dr. Karega had violated the fundamental responsibilities of Oberlin faculty members – namely, adherence to the “Statement of Professional Ethics” of the American Association of University Professors, which requires faculty members to “accept the obligation to exercise critical self-discipline and judgment in using, extending and transmitting knowledge” and to “practice intellectual honesty.”

Contrary to this obligation, Dr. Karega attacked her colleagues when they challenged inconsistencies in her description of the connection between her postings and her scholarship.  She disclaimed all responsibility for her misconduct.  And she continues to blame Oberlin and its faculty committees for undertaking a shared governance review process.

For these reasons, the faculty review committees and President Krislov agreed on the seriousness of Dr. Karega’s misconduct.  Indeed, the majority of the General Faculty Council, the executive body of Oberlin’s faculty, concluded that Dr. Karega’s postings could not be justified as part of her scholarship and had “irreparably impaired (her) ability to perform her duties as a scholar, a teacher, and a member of the community.”

In the face of Dr. Karega’s repeated refusal to acknowledge and remedy her misconduct, her continued presence undermines the mission and values of Oberlin’s academic community. Thus, any sanction short of dismissal is insufficient and the Board of Trustees is compelled to take this most serious action.

University of California at Berkeley Zionism Protest

Amid Blowback, University California Reinstates Course on Palestinian History

Amid pressure from AIPAC, and branches of the Israeli Lobby, students were able to reinstate the suspended course on Palestinian History. Fantastic job UC! Freedom of Speech is not reserved only for the ‘Chosen People’!

University of California at Berkeley Zionism Protest
The University of California at Berkeley — Zionism Protest

“Amid blowback, UC reinstates course on Palestinian history,” Source:

Facing a backlash over academic freedom, the University of California at Berkeley has reinstated a student-taught course on Palestinian history that it suspended last week after receiving complaints from dozens of Jewish organizations concerned that it was designed to push an anti-Israel agenda.

But a new review of “Palestine: A Settler Colonial Analysis” by senior faculty in the Department of Ethnic Studies concluded otherwise.

“Nothing in the syllabus indicates that a single viewpoint is taught uncritically,” the department chairwoman, Shari Huhndorf, wrote in a Sept. 18 letter to the dean of social sciences, who had suspended the class. “On the contrary,” it said, “the syllabus indicates that multiple viewpoints are welcomed and debated in the class.”

The class will resume this week under a slightly different name: “Palestine: A Settler Colonial Inquiry.”

The highly unusual move of suspending a course approved by the academic senate comes as the campus — like many others across the country — grapples with heightened tensions over Israel. In recent years, a majority of UC campus student governments have passed resolutions calling for divestment over the Israeli government’s human rights record — highly contentious and emotional campaigns that have left students on both sides feeling attacked.

This spring, the UC regents passed an anti-discrimination policy that specifically condemns anti-Semitic attacks on Zionism, or Israel’s right to exist. The initial proposal condemned all forms of “anti-Zionism,” but more nuance was added after widespread concerns from faculty over academic freedom.

Some students, including then-student regent Avi Oved, recalled instances of Jewish students being called “Zionist pigs” and other slurs.

A separate UC regents policy states that courses may not be used to push a single political agenda or to indoctrinate students — a rule cited by some critics of the course on Palestine, including the Anti-Defamation League.

Apology demanded

But the course’s undergraduate student instructor, Paul Hadweh, suspects the campus simply buckled under political pressure. He said no one from the administration approached him with concerns or questions about the class until after they had suspended it, and that he was treated as if he were “guilty.”

“I demand an apology from the administration for the harm that they have done,” Hadweh said Monday in an interview.

Hadweh said the class’s nearly 30 students come from diverse ethnic and religious backgrounds, and that while he doesn’t yet know their political views — the course only met once before it was suspended — any viewpoint will be respected.

Before discussing such complex and emotionally charged topics, the class entered into a “community agreement,” he said, to create “an open space free from personal attacks, free from any sort of discrimination, free from attacking anybody’s religious beliefs.”

The course syllabus and class name was modified slightly after a request from Carla Hesse, dean of Social Sciences, according to a letter the dean wrote Monday to department heads about the situation.

Hadweh said the changes were “cosmetic,” made to “clarify that the syllabus is about exploration of key questions on the topic of Palestine and settler colonialism.”

Hesse wrote that she asked the ethnic studies department head, the student instructor and the sponsor to consider “whether the course description and syllabus had a particular political agenda structured into its framing and weekly assignments in such a way as to limit open inquiry of the issues it engages,” and “whether the stated objective of the course to `explore the possibilities of a decolonized Palestine’ potentially violated Regents Policy by crossing over the line from teaching to political advocacy and organizing.”

‘Undue influence’

Hesse also wrote that she had received “understandable concerns” about academic freedom since her decision to suspend the one-unit course that is part of the longstanding DeCal program, led by students. In addition to an open letter from students in the course, outgoing Chancellor Nicholas Dirks received a letter late last week from the Middle East Studies Association of North America and its committee on academic freedom, expressing concern “that political groups based outside the university have been given undue influence over curricular matters …”

One pro-Israel advocate said she hopes this incident “opens up a broader conversation” about the vetting of courses. The dean asked the right questions about the course, said Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, director of the AMCHA Initiative, a pro-Israel advocacy group that documents cases of anti-Semitism in higher education.

“We would have liked for that to have happened at the get-go,” she said.

The course’s sponsor, UC Berkeley lecturer Hatem Bazian, said he was relieved the course will continue, but said it never should have been suspended. “The faculty own the curriculum,” he said, “and this is actually a very alarming point to see a university administration acting without due regard to the faculty expertise.”

Nicholas Dirks

Israel Linked To Suspension Of Palestine Course At UC Berkeley

Jewish censorship of historical truth has been going on for centuries. It is about time people stand up to tyranny. In 1789, John Robison (French 33-degree Mason) warned all Masonic leaders in America, that the Illuminati had infiltrated their lodges. On July 19, 1789, David Papen, President of Harvard University, warned the graduating-class and lectured them on the influence and infiltration of Illuminism in American politics and religion. International Jewry cannot let the truth out, if they do, they are finished. 

Nicholas Dirks
Scandal-plagued UC Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas Dirks leaves office as he arrived: amid controversy over his role in suppressing speech about Palestine.
“Israel linked to suspension of Palestine course at UC Berkeley,” Source:
The University of California, Berkeley – an institution synonymous with free speech protests in the 1960s – has shut down a student-led course on Palestine.
The censorship is one of Nicholas Dirks’ last acts as chancellor of the college. His administration decided to suspend the course after Israel-aligned organizations demanded that he do so.There are indications of pressure from the Israeli government as well.Dirks, who is stepping down as chancellor in the wake of persistent scandals over finances and personal conduct, leaves as he arrived: amid controversy over his role in stigmatizing and suppressing speech and scholarship related to Palestine.But the course suspension is also a worrying sign of the growing threat to free speech as Israel and its lobby groups move to suppress discussion of Palestine on campuses, inside and outside the classroom.

The one-unit course, which was set to run this semester and titled “Palestine: A Settler-Colonial Analysis,” was proposed by Palestinian-American student Paul Hadweh as part of the university’s Democratic Education at Cal initiative.

Known as DeCal, the program is taught by students under supervision from university staff.

The chancellor has alleged that “policies and procedures governing the review and approval of proposed courses” for DeCal had not been complied with.

He added that Carla Hesse, the executive dean of the College of Letters and Sciences at the university, “is very concerned” about a course “which espouses a single political viewpoint and/or appears to offer a forum for political organizing rather than an opportunity for the kind of open academic inquiry that Berkeley is known for.”

Dirks and Hesse appear to echo the claims made by anti-Palestinian organizations which have been targeting students and faculty who criticize Israel.

Hadweh says he followed every procedure and policy exactly as required in planning the class. He found out about the university’s scrutiny from a report in the Israeli media – two hours before his course was suspended.

Dirks and his administration were pressured, by more than 40 pro-Israel groups. Those groups signed a letter organized by the Amcha Initiative, urging that the course be censored.

Dirks’ office replied to Amcha on Tuesday morning this week. The reply seems to have been prompt – Amcha’s letter was dated 13 September, that same day.

Amcha is a Zionist organization unaffiliated with the university which has repeatedly intimidated, harassed and spied on students and faculty.


The Amcha letter claims that the student-run course would encourage “political indoctrination” and admonishes the student teacher for his involvement with Students for Justice in Palestine.

It also labels guest speakers listed in the course description as “politically motivated” individuals who “meet our government’s criteria for anti-Semitism,” accusing them of intending to “indoctrinate students to hate the Jewish state and take action to eliminate it.”

The course lists only two guest lecturers, both UC Berkeley faculty, Keith Feldman, an assistant professor of comparative ethnic studies and author of A Shadow over Palestine, and Hatem Bazian, a lecturer in Asian American and African diaspora studies.

Two years ago, Amcha published a target list of more than 200 professors around the US, including Bazian, who is the faculty sponsor of the DeCal course.

Amcha has also accused Feldman of anti-Semitism over the content of his book and his political critique of Zionism.

Last year, Amcha tried and failed to shut down a similar course at UC Riverside, leveling many of the same accusations.

“Secret” Israeli role

Hadweh said that students who had enrolled in the course were outraged to hear it had been suspended.

“More than anything, it’s saddening that this scholarly approach and academic inquiry is being so thoroughly delegitimized,” he told The Electronic Intifada on Thursday.

“The irony of the situation is that this course was suspended – without any democratic process whatsoever – because of the claim that it was a space for political mobilization,” Hadweh explained.

“In actually suspending the course, it has forced the students to mobilize politically.”

The students who signed up to take the DeCal course have published an open letter admonishing university administrators.

“The decision to suspend our course is both discriminatory and a violation of our academic freedom,” they write. “We demand the reinstatement of the course.”

A petition with the same demands has been initiated by the organization Jewish Voice for Peace.

The students, along with Hadweh, Bazian and lawyers with Palestine Legal, say that the university’s claim – that Hadweh did not comply with procedures – is entirely false.

“I complied with all policies and procedures required for creating the course,” Hadweh said earlier this week.

According to Hadweh, the course was “vetted and fully supported” by Bazian, as well as a committee tasked with approving all the university’s programs.

Hadweh added that UC Berkeley suspended the class without consulting him, Bazian or the committee which had approved it.

He said that he “first learned that our course was under scrutiny from a report in the Israeli media that describes the involvement of an Israeli government minister in efforts to cancel the course.”

Two hours later, he said, “I received an email from the university notifying us of the suspension.”

The report from Israel’s Channel 10 states that the “Association of University Heads of Israel is trying to prevent this course using secret means.”

It also says that Gilad Erdan, Israel’s minister in charge of combating the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions movement, described “the person who is giving the course as an extremist BDS activist.”

Erdan also said he is “acting to expose [Hatem] Bazian.”

Reports in Israeli media recently revealed that Erdan’s ministry of strategic affairs, supported by Israeli intelligence agencies, is engaging in “black ops” targeting Palestinian activists and human rights organizations.

“Failure of leadership”

Bazian confirmed that the university did not communicate with him or Hadweh prior to suspending the course.

He received an email from the dean at 9:59am on Tuesday saying she had determined that the course had not gone through sufficient academic review.

Half an hour later, he was emailed a copy of the letter Dirks’ office had sent to Amcha in which the chancellor stated that the course had been suspended.

“It went through my signature, it went through the department’s signature, it went through the academic senate that approves courses and got the course control number and room reservation,” he added.

Bazian said he was concerned about the university’s capacity to buckle under political pressure from outside groups, “completely throwing [out] academic freedom, freedom of speech, shared governance and the ability of students to engage in difficult and critical issues in a university.”

Placing blame

UC Berkeley officials maintain that outside organizations had no influence on the dean’s decision to spike the class.

However, it appears that after an outcry from Israel lobby groups, the dean acted quickly to place the blame solely on Hadweh, accusing him of failing to follow procedures.

Hesse claims she began investigations into the course in late August, although Inside Higher Ed has reported that they began earlier this month.

The investigation had been prompted by concerns raised within the university, Hesse has claimed, and started before any public criticisms were made.

UC Berkeley spokesperson Dan Mogulof also insisted that the timing of the letter sent by Amcha and the chancellor’s statement was “entirely coincidental.”

Mogulof told The Electronic Intifada that “this particular course did not receive the same level of scrutiny as other courses have,” adding that the university administration had “legitimate questions specifically related to Regents policy.”

He was referring to the recent statement by the Regents, the University of California’s governing body, on principles regarding “intolerance” that were also formulated under intense pressure and scrutiny from Israel lobby groups.

“The decision had been already made [to suspend the course] before the messages had reached us,” he asserted.

But close observers of academic freedom issues are not buying the university’s claims.

“The administration seems anxious to claim that their decision was made in reaction to the concerns of students, faculty and staff on campus,” John K. Wilson, editor of the American Association of University Professors’ Academe Blog, wrote. “But the truth is that Berkeley faced a global onslaught of organizations attacking them for allowing this course.”

And as Wilson noted, Mogulof himself had been communicating with right-wing pro-Israel media as early as 1 September, when Amcha and other campus watchdog groups had already been targeting the course.

“Anti-intellectual embarrassment”

Paul Hadweh described his course as “designed to provide students with the opportunity to critically engage with scholarship that examines Palestine’s past and present through the lens of settler-colonialism. In doing so, we hope to explore durable and just political solutions.”

“This course is more about asking questions than providing answers,” Hadweh added. “I think it would be valuable to study this and clearly many of my peers at UC Berkeley do too.”

He said that enrollment had to be expanded after 31 students signed up for a class limited to 24.

“Now UC Berkeley has censored the class before we could even have one discussion,” Hadweh said. “That’s not the education we signed up for.”

The actions of Dirks and Hesse “are profoundly anti-intellectual and an embarrassment to UC Berkeley,” Palestine Legal’s Liz Jackson told The Electronic Intifada, “not to mention a violation of the university’s legal obligations.”

Jackson said that Hesse had summarily suspended the course without reviewing the material “and went over the heads of the faculty chair and department chair, who are experts on substantive issues.”

“Under fundamental academic freedom principles, there can be no requirement that a course be so-called balanced between two sides,” she said. “Because to enforce such a requirement would require a level of intrusion on faculty expertise and a policing of course content from above.”

In reviewing the list of DeCal courses offered this semester and in previous semesters, it is “painfully obvious” that UC Berkeley has placed requirements against “one-sided” political viewpoints only on issues related to Palestine, she added.

“Is Marxism one-sided? Is Copwatch one-sided? The First Amendment and academic freedom obligations prohibit the university from applying a special rule to content that is favorable to Palestinian rights.”

In addition, the rights of students of Palestinian origin to access an equal education is an “alarming legal issue,” Jackson explained.

What we’re seeing here is the university’s flagrant pandering to outside interests, mainly the Israel lobby, and they have abandoned their duty to protect the educational environment from the interference of outside interests,” she said.

“The result is that a Palestinian American student and his peers who want to study a complex issue from a Palestinian perspective are denied their ability to study their own history at their school.”

“That is flirting dangerously with racial and national origin discrimination,” Jackson said.

Dirks’ pandering to anti-Palestinian pressure

Nicholas Dirks’ scandal-plagued tenure at the helm of UC Berkeley ends just as it began, with the chancellor throwing Palestinians – and academic freedom – under the bus in an effort to appease pro-Israel critics.

In fact, the story of Dirks’ pandering to anti-Palestinian pressure begins even before he arrived in California, when he was vice president for arts and sciences at New York’s Columbia University.

In 2004, the Israel lobby group The David Project released Columbia Unbecoming, a film alleging that faculty, particularly Professor Joseph Massad, had intimidated and abused students who disagreed with their critical views on Israel and had made anti-Semitic remarks in class.

The film was a key element in a campaign by pressure groups spanning more than a decade, targeting Massad, seeking to deny him tenure and to force him out of his job over his views on Israel and its state ideology, Zionism.

In consultation with Dirks, Columbia President Lee Bollinger appointed an investigative committee to look into the film’s lurid claims, which were backed and amplified by various New York politicians, including then congressman Anthony Weiner.

But the investigative committee’s report, released in March 2005, dismissed the allegations and found no evidence of anti-Semitism.

Even The New York Times, which supported investigations of alleged “anti-Israeli bias” at Columbia, conceded in an editorial that “There is no evidence that anyone’s grade suffered for challenging the pro-Palestinian views of any teacher or that any professors made anti-Semitic statements. The professors who were targeted have legitimate complaints themselves. Their classes were infiltrated by hecklers and surreptitious monitors, and they received hate mail and death threats.”

Yet it was Dirks himself who gave new life to the false allegations after he was named as UC Berkeley’s next chancellor in November 2012.

The UC Berkeley news office published a video interview with Dirks in which he attacked Columbia.

Dirks claimed it had been

“very difficult” for “some students to find safe spaces in which to talk about Israel where they didn’t feel that the basic context in which they found themselves wasn’t hugely not just anti-Israel, but by implication, anti-Jewish and anti-Semitic.”

He also boasted about his own role in the witch hunt targeting Massad:

“We, in fact, and it was my responsibility as the executive vice president for the arts and sciences, convened an unprecedented faculty committee to look into some of the allegations that had been made.”

He also repudiated a petition he had signed in 2002, calling for divestment from companies that supply military hardware Israel uses to maintain its occupation in Palestine. “Truth is, I do not support divestment as a strategy for the university. I don’t support divestment with respect to Israel,” Dirks said.

The UC Berkeley news office revealed that the interview with Dirks had been “recorded shortly before” the Board of Regents, the University of California’s top governing body, approved his appointment.

Dirks’ statements reviving the debunked Israel lobby smears did not go unnoticed by his former colleagues at Columbia, 14 of whom responded with a public letter condemning him.

“Our sense of outrage stems from Dirks’ denial of the fact that the very committee set up by then Vice President Dirks found no evidence whatever for concerns about the climate for Jewish students let alone about the nature of instruction in our department,” the professors of Middle East, South Asian and African studies wrote. “We feel affronted by the fact that the chancellor’s defaming the department means that he now rejects the committee’s finding and seems instead to accept as true the false accusations leveled against us by an external hate group that has since been exposed and discredited.”

Dirks was also one of the college administrators who in the wake of the University of Illinois’ firing of Steven Salaita under the banner of protecting “civility,” apparently sided with those who sought to stifle free expression.

Salaita, whose case sparked international concern over the use of the vague concept of civility as a cover for censorship, was fired over tweets critical of Israel during its summer 2014 attack on Gaza.

In a message to the UC Berkeley community just weeks after Salaita’s firing, Dirks declared that “we can only exercise our right to free speech insofar as we feel safe and respected in doing so, and this in turn requires that people treat each other with civility.”

Dirks’ statement provoked scathing criticism from fellow academics and free speech advocates.

Anita Levy, associate secretary at the American Association of University Professors, called Dirks’ position “astonishing.”

“That the university which gave rise to the free speech movement should celebrate it by embracing the notion of civility is patently absurd,” Levy said.