Snake

VIDEO: Freemasons 300th Anniversary Webcast Oct 2017

If you can stomach the sick propaganda that tries to make the gullible believe in the ‘benevolent nature’ of this Satanic group, and if you are able to see through the Kabbalistic Satanic symbolism that represents this evil, then you will realize how CONTROLLED our world already is. Not to mention the actual presence of the Grand Master, the Duke of Kent which speaks volumes and the fact that they have made this video ‘public’. So, what we must focus on, is on our responsibility here, which is to create a ‘world’ that is completely independent of these diabolical entities and try to work in smaller communities without having to depend on them until we are able to destroy these demons. 

Luke 8:17 For nothing is secret, that shall not be made manifest; neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come to light.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuCd0xCVJ-U

DOCUMENTARY: “Things We Won’t Say About Race That Are True”

This documentary, mind you by Channel 4, brings up many interesting and true points about race relations in the United Kingdom. Nonetheless, and of course, it doesn’t address the real core of these race-related societal problems (eg. why it is happening, who encourages it, etc.). It is a daft propaganda piece aiming for the British public to accept all of this change as the new normal. This is illustrated by their conclusion at 1:02:04 — listen closely.

The Codenhove-Kalgari Plan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHu4zZH_IPA&t

EXCLUSIVE: Will the U.S. Withdraw its Troops from Syria after ISIS is Routed?

According to Washington Post, the U.S. hopes to prolong its military presence in Kurdish-dominated Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) areas in the north of Syria. Current United States Secretary of Defense, serving in the Cabinet of Donald Trump, James Norman Mattis proved this fact saying ‘We’re not just going to walk away right now.’

Officially the U.S. strength in Syria stood at approximately 500 troops, including hundreds of additional Special Operations forces, forward air controllers, artillery crews and others. They basically lend support to militants and Kurdish militias.

Besides, the Americans unlawfully set up a military base not far from Syrian-Jordan border in At-Tanf in April 2017. The military instructors from the U.S., Great Britain, and France train New Syrian Army’s radicals for fighting official Syrian government instead of eliminating ISIS there.

By setting up the military garrison the U.S. military command created a 55 km buffer zone over it that allowed them to prevent a UN humanitarian convoy from being admitted to the area in early November. As a result, 50,000 refugees from Raqqa and Deir-Ezzor in Rukban camp were left without basic necessities. The refugees living in that desert camp in southeast Syria practically are being used by the United States to shield its military base.

Today a number of mainstream media discuss a military future of the U.S. Command in Syria. In particular, British Reuters reported that the Pentagon is likely to announce in the coming days that there are about 2,000 U.S. troops in Syria.

However, the issue of subsequent deploying of the U.S. troops in Syria remains. According to some diplomatic sources, the U.S. Congress completely upholds Trump advocating early withdrawal of the troops from Syria just after ISIS is rooted. But it totally contradicts Pentagon’s initiatives.

Probably, the U.S. Congress shares not only Trump’s but also people’s point of view on the issue of illegal American presence under the international law and lack of military successes against the background of vast resources spent. The U.S. Department of State claims the US-led international coalition have already wasted $22 billion tax dollars trying to beat ISIS both in Iraq and Syria.

In such a situation prolonged U.S. troops’ presence on the territory of the sovereign state only plays into the hands of high-ranking Pentagon’s chiefs, army contractors, and neocons. It seems the U.S. DoD doesn’t take care of the money of common American taxpayers to say nothing of thousands of Syrians have been dying since U.S. presence in the country.

Last summer News Week reported more than 5 thousand civilians had been killed as a result of indiscriminate airstrikes of the international coalition form October 2014 till June 2017.

Hopefully, Washington and Pentagon respecting the sovereignty of the independent state and international law will find a common language and withdraw the contingent as Damascus calls for, at least after ISIS be completely defeated. Maybe then all those responsible for an extra-budgetary strain and international crimes against humanity would be brought to justice.

Sophie Mangal is an American Patriot, 27, is a special investigative writer and contributor for ZionistReport.com. Her Hindu surname “Mangal” derives from the Sanskrit “mangala,” meaning “auspicious.” After attending the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill as a media and journalism major, Mangal monitored the refugee crisis in Europe, drawing parallels between the Syrian conflict and the Balkan problem, and has visited Syria on several occasions. She can be reached at sophia.mangal@mail.com.

ARA San Juan

COMMENTARY: Missing Argentinian Submarine Closer To London

Below you will find a Google translation of an article recently published today in a Spanish newspaper called “Diario 16”. We have also posted the original article below the translation. Knowing who the President of Argentina, Mauricio Macri responds to, and how he continues the Kirchner saga selling out the country to the enemy, it comes as no surprise that this submarine could have been destroyed by a missile if it got anywhere close to the Falklands. Was the submarine in a secret mission while navigating close to the islands? Is the Argentinian government allowing the US and UK ‘play war’ in the Argentinian Sea?  

ARA San Juan

“Missing Argentinian Submarine, Closer to London,” Source: diario16.com

Different conversations between the Argentine military, which Diario16 has had access to, lead us to believe that the vanished ARA San Juan was attacked by English missiles.

When political or State interests precede the duty of leaders to inform the people, especially when it comes to events which have resulted in a direct attack to citizens, it is often the case that these events become concealed.

It is quite possibly this is what is happening in Argentina in reference to the disappearance of the military submarine ARA San Juan. According to different audio recordings of communications between Argentine militaries to which Diario16 has had access, the reason for the collapse and disappearance of the ship had nothing to do with an internal explosion but, according to these testimonies, it was an external explosion produced by a missile fired by the British Naval Forces found in the Falkland Islands.

The first testimony is as follows: “One of the doctors here has a son working in the navy. A week ago it was of general knowledge that the submarine was 400 meters deep because it was bombed, torpedoed. It left Tierra del Fuego and approached the Falklands and an English submarine torpedoed and destroyed it. They will not say it because we will end up in another war. That’s what happened. Unfortunately, they are all dead and you have to see when they will confirm all that Unfortunately, it is reality ».

The second testimony is a dialogue between two Argentine militaries:

«Military 1: Confirmed. Sunken by England

»Military 2: Sons of bitches. Back to war?

»Military 1: We are prepared to go to war, to mobilize the navy and the air force.

»Military 2: In QRB there is a sizing».

The third testimony is the most extensive and explains what, according to these militaries, is a fact confirmed and being hidden:

“Four days ago, people who are in Prefecture said that the high command knew that a missile hit the ship. They found it 200 km from the Falklands, outside the area of naval coverage that we have in Argentina. I do not know if it was done by the North American Air Force, but they say it was the English. This was known by the high commanders 4 days ago and they did not tell the bosses or the president of the nation. Since yesterday heads are beginning to roll. They will change the heads of the 4 forces and all the high commands that were available to the operative. They were attacked by an underwater missile and they already knew it. To avoid international problems they said nothing. They went to a reconnaissance of the land and the submarine was only for 32 people and there were 44 people, with 4 divers, that nobody knows what those 4 divers do inside the submarine. Supposedly there was no operation for these people to be there. I know because Patricio is commenting. Obviously, here, inside the regiment, we know it. Supposedly the submarine was recognizing the place, left the area in which they were authorized, they saw something strange, they ordered them to follow, it was all secret, and obviously found an English missile and attacked and blew to hell. They knew they had gone to a place where they did not have to be. They found them near Malvinas. Will the English wait for them to touch land or do something? No. They did all the pantomime because it did not suit politically for Argentina because what are we going to do, bomb the Falklands? We know this from Prefecture ».

“Four days ago, people who are in Prefecture said that the high command knew that a missile hit the ship. They found it 200 km from the Falklands, outside the area of naval coverage that we have in Argentina. I do not know if it was done by the North American Air Force, but they say it was the English. This was known by the high commanders 4 days ago and they did not tell the bosses or the president of the nation. Since yesterday heads are beginning to roll. They will change the heads of the 4 forces and all the high commands that were available to the operative. They were attacked by an underwater missile and they already knew it. To avoid international problems they said nothing. They went to a reconnaissance of the land and the submarine was only for 32 people and there were 44 people, with 4 divers, that nobody knows what those 4 divers do inside the submarine. Supposedly there was no operation for these people to be there. I know because Patricio is commenting. Obviously, here, inside the regiment, we know it. Supposedly the submarine was recognizing the place, left the area in which they were authorized, they saw something strange, they ordered them to follow, it was all secret, and obviously found an English missile and attacked and blew to hell. They knew they had gone to a place where they did not have to be. They found them near Malvinas. Will the English wait for them to touch land or do something? No. They did all the pantomime because it did not suit politically for Argentina because what are we going to do, bomb the Falklands? We know this from Prefecture ».

If what is stated in these conversations were true, the incident would be a casus belli. But what would Argentina do? To enter into war again with one of the greatest war powers on the planet? Obviously, no, and that is why it would be necessary for the people to know nothing.

If what is stated in these conversations were true, the incident would be a casus belli. But what would Argentina do? To enter into war again with one of the greatest war powers on the planet? Obviously, no, and that is why it would be necessary for the people to know nothing.

In the villages of southern Spain, with different versions, the story of the good pipe in front of a fireplace or taking the fresco (there was no television) was told in the family. Someone who begins by asking, “Do you want me to tell you the story of the good pipe?” And everyone answered “Yes,” to which the first said “I did not say yes or no, I just asked if you want me to tell you the story of the good pipe », and so you could spend hours like that and never get anywhere. The same thing is happening here. Did the British Naval Force bomb the ARA San Juan? The Argentine military responds yes but its government does not confirm it nor, of course, the British authorities of the Malvinas, but did it bomb the Naval Force …? Allegedly the Argentine military claims that the submarine was sunk but its government does not confirm or deny it. Diario16 does not say yes or no if they want to tell the story of the good pipe.

“El submarino argentino desaparecido se acerca a Londres,” Source: diario16.com

Cuando los intereses políticos o la razón de Estado se anteponen al deber de los gobernantes de informar al pueblo, sobre todo cuando se trata de temas en los que se ha producido un atentado a los ciudadanos, suele ocurrir que esa anteposición se convierte en ocultación y en hurto para salvar intereses privados, ya sean personales, ya sean políticos, ya sean estatales.

Posiblemente esto sea lo que esté ocurriendo en Argentina en referencia a la desaparición del submarino militar ARA San Juan. Según diferentes grabaciones de comunicaciones de militares argentinos a las que ha tenido acceso Diario16 la razón del hundimiento y desaparición de la nave no tuvo nada que ver una explosión interna sino que, según estos testimonios, fue una explosión externa producida por un misil disparado por las Fuerzas Navales británicas que se encuentran en las Islas Malvinas.

El primer testimonio es el siguiente: «Uno de los médicos de acá el hijo trabaja en la naval y tiene la posta. Hace una semana se sabía lo del submarino que está a 400 metros de profundidad porque lo bombardearon, lo torpedearon. Salió de Tierra de Fuego y se acercó por demás a las Malvinas y un submarino inglés lo torpedeó y lo destrozó. No lo van a decir porque terminamos en otra guerra. Eso es lo que pasó. Lamentablemente están todos muertos y hay que ver cuándo van a confirmar todo ese tema. Lamentablemente es la realidad».

El segundo testimonio es un diálogo entre dos militares argentinos:

«Militar 1: Confirmado. Hundido por Inglaterra

»Militar 2: La concha de la reputa madre que lo parió. ¿Retorno a la guerra?

»Militar 1: Estamos preparados para ir a la guerra, a movilizar la armada a la fuerza aérea.

»Militar 2: En QRB hay un apresto».

El tercer testimonio es el más extenso y explica lo que, según estos militares, es un hecho confirmado y que se está ocultando:

«Gente que está en Prefectura hace cuatro días dijeron que los altos mandos que sabían que un misil le pegó al buque. Lo encontraron a 200 km de las Malvinas, fuera del área de cobertura naval que tenemos en Argentina. No sé si será de la Fuerza Aérea Norteamericana, pero dicen que fueron los ingleses. Esto lo sabían los altos mandos hace 4 días y no se lo dijeron ni a los jefes ni al presidente de la nación. Desde ayer cortaron cabezas. Se van a cambiar los jefes de las 4 fuerzas y todos los altos mandos que estaban a disposición del operativo. Fueron atacados por un misil submarino y que ya lo sabían. Para evitar problemas internacionales no dijeron nada. Fueron a un reconocimiento del terreno y el submarino sólo era para 32 personas e iban 44 personas, con 4 buzos, que nadie sabe qué hacen esos 4 buzos dentro del submarino. Supuestamente no había ningún operativo para que esa gente estuviera ahí. Yo lo sé porque en Patricio se está comentando. Obviamente, acá, dentro del regimiento lo sabemos. Supuestamente el submarino estaba reconociendo el lugar, se fue del área en que estaban autorizados, vieron algo raro, les ordenaron que siguieran, que fuera todo secreto, y obviamente los encontró un misil inglés y los atacaron y los hicieron volar a la mierda. Sabían que habían ido a un lugar donde no tenían que estar. Los encontraron cerca de Malvinas. ¿Van a esperar los ingleses a que toquen tierra o que hagan algo? No. Hicieron toda la pantomima esta porque no convenía ni políticamente para la Argentina porque ¿qué vamos a hacer, bombardear Malvinas? Esto lo sabemos desde Prefectura».

Reproductor de audioNadie ha confirmado aún nada y todo indica que fuera lo que fuese lo que ocurrió con el ARA San Juan el pueblo argentino va a quedarse sin saberlo porque lo ocultarán o darán una versión distorsionada para contentar a las familias de los 44 muertos y que no se vean afectadas las razones de Estado o los intereses de las élites políticas, financieras y empresariales del país.

Si lo que se afirman en estas conversaciones fuera cierto, el incidente sería un casus belli. Pero, ¿qué haría Argentina? ¿Entrar en guerra nuevamente con una de las potencias bélicas más grandes del planeta? Evidentemente, no y por eso sería necesario que el pueblo no sepa nada.

¿Es descartable que el hecho sea real? No lo es. En España tenemos experiencia de cómo se las gastan los británicos cuando alguien entra en sus colonias. Pero tampoco se puede afirmar tan rotundamente como lo hacen estos militares porque nadie lo ha confirmado oficialmente ni hay pruebas reales para que desde los medios de comunicación se fuerce esa confirmación.

En los pueblos del sur de España, con diferentes versiones, se contaba en familia El cuento de la buena pipa frente a una chimenea o tomando el fresco (no existía la televisión). Alguien preguntaba «¿Quieres que te cuente el cuento de la buena pipa?» y todos contestaban «Sí», a lo que el primero decía «Yo no te digo ni que sí ni que no, yo sólo te digo que si quieres que te cuente el cuento de la buena pipa», y así se podían pasar horas. Con esto ocurre lo mismo. ¿Bombardeó la Fuerza Naval británica al ARA San Juan? Los militares argentinos afirman que sí pero su gobierno no lo confirma ni, por supuesto las autoridades británicas de las Malvinas, pero, ¿bombardeó la Fuerza Naval…? Presuntamente los militares argentinos afirman que el submarino fue hundido pero su gobierno no lo confirma ni lo desmiente. Diario16 no dice que sí ni que no, que si quieren que le cuente el cuento de la buena pipa.

 

VIDEO: EXPOSED – Britain First – Zionist Agent Provocateurs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8kjpmfA5CbQ&feature=youtu.be

Today, Trump tweeted his support for Britain First.
Regardless of what you think about Muslim migrants and Islamic terrorism, there is a push happening. This push will lead to a clash of civilizations that will result in WW3. Zionist Agent Provocateurs, like Jayda Fransen, now have public approval by Donald Trump and this will further embolden both sides.

This video was produced by Verdant Servant (disclaimer – we do not endorse everything on their channel).

VIDEO: Lord Rothschild Present / Balfour Declaration Centenary Event

Theresa May and Benjamin Netanyahu really went out all in this speech — pleasing their true master — Lord Rothschild. You can spot him sitting right in front.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jEEgBVnnNkM&t=525s

eBOOK: The World Order | Our Secret Rulers

The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism

“The World Order, Our Secret Rulers”, By Eustace Mullins (1992)

This book expands on “Secrets of the Federal Reserve”, by the same author, and details the history of the interlocking financial and business elites in Britain, Europe, and the United States. It also includes some interesting history of the major tax-exempt foundations.

Table of Contents

Chapter One / The “New” World Order

Chapter Two / The Rothschilds

Chapter Three / Soviet Russia

Chapter Four / Franklin Delano Roosevelt

Chapter Five / The Business of America

Chapter Six / The CIA

Chapter Seven / The Bechtel Complex 

Chapter Eight / The Foundations

Chapter Nine / The Rule of the Order

[embeddoc url=”http://zionistreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Eustace-Mullins-The-World-Order-Our-Secret-Rulers-2nd-edition-1992.pdf” download=”all” viewer=”google”]

COMMENTARY: Lenin’s Jewish Roots

Oy Vey!!

This article is full of disinformation, and it is the main reason we decided to publish it. The author, a Tribe member, goes on to chastise Stalin for being a rabid “Anti-Semite”, yet what he fails to note is that Stalin married a Jew (this link is from a Jewish source), and there is considerable evidence that Stalin was a Jew himself

This is why understanding history, reading, and constantly questioning is imperative. Understanding what happened (the lies) in the Bolshevik Revolution and WWII is absolutely critical to understanding the world we live in today.

Lenin Was Jewish

“Lenin’s Jewish Roots,” Source: thejc.com

This is a note to the radical Leftists close to Jeremy Corbyn in the Labour Party as they mark — or should it be celebrate — the 100th anniversary of the Russian Revolution.

The resurgent Leninists in the Party — no names, no pack drill, but I think we have an idea who they are — may not know the recently rediscovered story of Lenin’s antecedents. The Soviets censored all mention of it for 70 years, mainly because of deep rooted antisemitism in Russia, but the leader of the Revolution and the founder of the USSR, was many parts Jewish, through his mother.

The facts came to light only after the Soviet Union collapsed and Communist Party archives recently opened. Even then, though, Russian historians kept quiet about the information; it was left to Western biographers, to piece together the various fragments of the story, as I did in my book Lenin the Dictator: An Intimate Portrait, published earlier this year.

The grandfather of Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov — he began to take the pseudonym Lenin when he was around 30 — was born Sril Moiseyevich (Israel Moses) Blank in Odessa in the early 1800s. Like so many ambitious young men in the Tsarist empire, while studying medicine in his early twenties he converted to Russian Orthodoxy and changed his first name and patronymic to Alexander Dimitreyevich. He travelled widely in Europe after qualifying as a doctor and he married the daughter of a wealthy German merchant, Anna Groschopf. She was a Protestant and their children were brought up as Christians. Eventually he achieved a high enough rank in the Civil Service to qualify as Noble status, which, under the Romanovs, he never could have done as a Jew. The evidence suggests that Lenin’s mother, Maria Alexandrovna, knew about her background but never mentioned it, even to her husband or children.

Lenin was almost certainly unaware of his part Jewish ancestry. His older sister Anna discovered a piece of the story in her thirties when she went to Switzerland and met a family called Blank. She was told that nearly all Swiss by that name were likely to be Jews. Then she found that a silver cup — a Blank family heirloom that had come from her mother — was the kind typically used for Jewish festivals. By her own admission, she never spoke of it to her brother Vladimir.

Soon after Lenin died in 1924 Anna was asked by the Lenin Institute, established to preserve his “legacy”, to write a definitive history of the Ulyanov family. She did a thorough job and found out details about her grandfather that were entirely new to her. She didn’t mention her work to anyone outside the family for many years.

But in 1932, shortly before her own death, she wrote to Stalin and revealed her findings. She went to his office in the Kremlin and handed the letter to him. “It’s probably no secret to you that our research on our grandfather shows that he came from a poor Jewish family,” she told him. The letter only came to light a few years ago. Publishing the facts, she said, “could help to combat antisemitism…Vladimir Ilyich always valued Jews highly and was always persuaded of their exceptional abilities.” Stalin responded immediately, ordering her “Absolutely not one word about this letter to anyone.” Stalin was a rabid Jew hater and probably felt viscerally, as well as calculated politically, that it would not have helped the Communist cause amongst Russians if it had been revealed that the founder of the Soviet state had Jewish roots.

If Lenin had known, he would probably have been relaxed about the revelation. As he once told the writer Maxim Gorky. “We do not have many intelligent people. (Russians) are a talented people. But we are lazy. A bright Russian is nearly always a Jew or a person with an admixture of Jewish blood.’

Lenin was many things — among them a dictator who sent many thousands of people to their deaths — but one thing he can’t be accused of is antisemitism. Many of the leading early Bolsheviks, such as Trotsky, were Jews — though few Jews in the 1900s, or later, were Bolsheviks. In the bloody Russian Civil War from 1918-1921, in which around six million people died, there were many cases of pogroms by the White Russian armies, who routinely slaughtered Jews in towns and villages from the Crimea to Siberia. In one night nearly a thousand Jews were butchered by bayonets in Kiev.

There were a few isolated cases of atrocities by the Reds. When Lenin heard about them he was apoplectic with rage and ordered a full investigation. He was the first Russian leader to speak out against antisemitism, though he knew that probably it would do the Bolshevik cause little good.

In 1921 he made 16 three minute propaganda gramophone records to be played in villages and town halls throughout the fledgling USSR.

He chose as the subject of one of them On Pogroms and the Persecution of the Jews. I would commend them to Mr Corbyn as the row over antisemitism in the Labour Party a century later rumbles on. With a minor tweak to update the context for today some Labour voters, especially younger ones, might want him to say something like Lenin did. “It is not the Jews who are the workers’ enemies. It is the capitalists of all the countries. The great majority of Jews are themselves workers… They are our brothers being oppressed by the capitalists, our comrades in the struggle for socialism. The Jews have their kulaks, their exploiters and their capitalists, just like the Russians. Just like all nations…It is the capitalists who inflame hatred against the Jews.”

Victor Sebestyen is the author of Lenin the Dictator: An Intimate Portrait (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, £25)