VIDEO: Who Murdered 66 Million Russians!?

Indeed, the mass slaughter of Russians in the Bolshevik Revolution and Holodomor are not reported in an unbiased manner throughout mainstream and alternative media (RT Included).

Ask yourself, why is this the case? We sourced this video from Brexit Party:

INTERVIEW: Martinez And Bjerknes Unmask The Putin Cult

A MUST LISTEN, absolutely everything exposed during this interview is 100% TRUE, and this is what we need people to see and finally realize once and for all, that either they begin using their own brain and doing their own research, or they are allowing the enemy to lead them to their own self-destruction. Please share and spread the word.

VIDEO: David Duke on Bolsheviks, Communism, & The Tribe

David Duke talks about communism, Soviet Union, Bolsheviks, Lenin, Trotsky, Marxism, Jacob Schiff, Russian Revolution, and more.
Lenin (Vladimir Ulyanov), Leon Trotsky (Lev Bronstein), Karl Marx, Josef Stalin, Rothschilds, Paul Warburg, Max Warburg, Jacob Schiff, Pol Pot (Saloth Sar) and Mao Zedong are some of the most horrible human beings in history.

For the full interview click the following link:

COMMENTARY: Russia Not For Russians. Why Vladimir Putin Is Not A Nationalist

Did the Soviet Union ever cease to exist? Or did it simply morph into a disguised ‘democracy’? If this magnificent essay does not make you see reality, NOTHING EVER WILL. With the internet and the unlimited possibilities it provides to communicate with those who live there and can tell us the truth, there is no justification for people to remain ignorant of the horrific threat that Putin and ‘his so-called comrades’ are to humanity. The same threat is in those who praise this soviet criminal in the media whatever the source may be and our politicians who are all traitors playing the game to enslave us all under Communism. Open your eyes wide and don’t let the LIES deceive you! 


“Vseslav Volkov: Russia not for Russians. Why Vladimir Putin is not a Nationalist – POKROV,” Source:

There is  common inclination among the right-wingers living outside the countries of the former Soviet Union – which seems absurd  for us (as residents of countries which are firsthand familiar with Putin’s regime) – to imagine Putin’s Russia as the stronghold of “white right conservatism.” Among Putin’s “right-wing friends” in the West, there are many who, alas, went to a conscious cooperation with the Kremlin, in the hope of obtaining political or even financial dividends from it. However, we believe that the bulk of supporters of Putin and modern Russia are people who – for one reason or another – have been deprived of objective information about what is happening in this country, forced to base their assessments on Kremlin sources such as Russia Today, or judging about Russia and Putin on the basis of popular western liberal “horror stories” – giving out wishful thinking. We would like to correct this, and for this, we publish a short review from our adherent, a Russian nationalist who lives in this country and has been involved in the activities of the Russian far-right movement for more than 15 years.


From the author

Dear readers! With these essay I did not set out to give you an exhaustive picture of Putinism and, in general, of modern Russia – this would require a multivolume fundamental work, supported by even more extensive quantitative research and statistical data. This is only a laconic overview, the purpose of which is to induce those of you who really are interested in Russia and its people and are not indifferent to their destiny, to get acquainted independently with numerous testimonies (which are widely available in open access) about the processes taking place in the country. To facilitate this task you can find a list of references to various sources recommended for you in the text and in the footnotes as well as at the end of the article [1] .

  1. A wrong translation

A correct understanding of what is going on in the modern Russia implies an understanding of what it does constitute. In Russian – unlike English – there is a clear linguistic division of concepts «russki» (ethnic Russian) and «rossijski» (relating to Russia as a state). At the same time, both concepts are translated into English as «Russian», but there is a great difference between them.

According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, adopted in 1993 (shortly after the shooting of the then parliament from tanks), the state is a federation built on an ethnic basis, which is reflected in the territorial structure: of the 85 regions, 27 [2] are “homelands” for ethnic minorities of Russia – thus ensuring the representation of their interests at the state level. “Own” regions are possessed by the Tatars, Chechens, Yakuts, Buryats and many other peoples of Russia.

Where, then, is the “Russian Republic” – a region representing 80% of the population of the whole country? There is no such region, there are only denationalized “krays” and “oblasts”, which are “regions for all”. Maybe there is a state body authorized to defend the rights of Russians at the federal level? Again, no. The federal government represents the interests of all citizens of Russia, regardless of nationality.

In the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, there is not even a mention of the Russian (in the ethnic sense) people, as in any other law of the Russian Federation.

Thus, ethnic Russians (~ 80% of the country’s population) even legally do not have any relation to the Russian Federation.

In addition, unlike the numerous diasporas who are in constant contact with the Russian authorities at all levels and successfully lobby their interests, there is no one political or public organization in Russia that would officially defend the interests of the Russians as a people. Any attempts by the Russians to create such an organization are suppressed as manifestations of “extremism.”

1) The main advocate of the interests of the Jewish diaspora in Russia; 2) the newspaper of the Azerbaijani diaspora: “We are for Putin. Putin is for us “

2. Repressions against Russians

Moreover, the very formulation of the question of the rights of ethnic Russians in Russia is fraught with criminal prosecution. Vladimir Putin clearly indicated his position on the “Russian question” yet in the middle of the 2000s, calling the adherents of the slogan “Russia – for Russians ”[3] “jerks and provocateurs” [4], and the struggle “with anti-Semitism, like … with any nationalism and chauvinism, – the basis of our domestic policy [5]”. In addition, such slogans as “Russian power for Russia” and even “Russian, do not drink!”, “”Russian” – means “sober”” [6] are officially considered extremist in Russia.

Thousands of Russian citizens – primarily nationalists – are in prison under “political” articles. The article 282 of the Criminal Code (“Raising hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity”) has already become a sad symbol of Putin’s totalitarianism, uniting against itself right-wing and left-wing activists, nationalists and liberals.

Is this a mistake of the Putin system, its defect? Definitely not. In a state like Russia, nationalism is one of the mobilizing forces – the forces that can lead the population out of social “dormancy” and motivate them to political struggle for their rights. The purpose of nationalists at this stage is essentially “the emancipation of the Russian people”, which is unthinkable in the autocratic post-Soviet kleptocracy, in a system where everything is decided exclusively “from the top down”, herewith with “individual approach”, by “agreements.” If it is possible for Kremlin to “reach an agreement” with, for example, the ethnocracies of the North Caucasus (who have long recognized themselves as political actors), simply giving them the next multibillion-dollar subsidies from the dwindling Russian budget, then how to negotiate with 120 million Russians across the country? They will have to radically reorganize the entire system, and the Kremlin does not need this at all. The system is afraid to communicate with large, poorly managed masses of people – even if they demonstrate loyalty.

  1. «Soviet Russia» is an oxymoron

With “historical Russia” – the Russian Empire – the Russian Federation also has nothing in common except the flag and the coat of arms. The RF is the official “continuer” of the USSR [7]a country built on both worldview negation and the physical destruction of the social order that existed in Russia before 1917.

For 70 years, the Soviet system has often undergone cosmetic transformations, sometimes even borrowing elements of “past life” [8], while the real Russia was either physically destroyed (like millions of Russian peasants, officers, clergymen and intellectuals), or “squeezed” into emigration, or forced to go into deep underground. Here is an incomplete list of crimes committed by the Soviet government: the “Red Terror”, the famine of 1920-21, the genocide of the Cossacks, the repressions against the intellectuals in the late 1920s, the “collectivization” (destruction of the peasantry) and the Holodomor (which took place – in addition to Ukraine – in the Volga region and Kazakhstan), the terror of mid-late 1930s, many war crimes during the World War II, post-war repressions, the post-war famine, the testing of nuclear weapons on its own population in the 1950s, technological catastrophe in Chernobyl and many other. A lot of historical works are devoted to this topic, the most “classical” of which are the “GULAG Archipelago” by A. Solzhenitsyn and the “Black Book of Communism” by S. Courtois.

From the point of view of Russian nationalism, not unimportant is also the national composition of the top of the Bolshevik Party, the backbone of which was composed of Jews (more than half) and Caucasians [9].

The Russian resistance to Bolshevism lasted as long as Bolshevism itself:

  • After the October Revolution of 1917 the White Army, many times inferior to the Red forces in numbers, but a much more motivated, better-quality and better-organized, have “defended Russia from Soviet slavery for 3 years “[10];
  • In the interwar period in the south of Russia, in Siberia and other regions underground resistance groups acted, in Europe – Russian emigrants-anti-communists eliminated Soviet diplomats [11], carried out daring subversive attacks on Soviet territory [12], fought against the “red international” in Spain [13], the emigrant anticommunist movement embraced dozens of thousands of people on several continents – from Paris and New York to Shanghai and Harbin;
  • The Second World War gave the Russian people an unprecedented opportunity to crush the regime that destroyed it, but the ill-conceived and often Russophobian policy of the German leadership, and later – skilfully juggling “Russian patriotic themes” on Stalin’s part, buried this undertaking; nevertheless, according to various estimates, from 1 to 1.5 million Soviet citizens fought on the side of Germany and its allies, of which about a half were Russians, including Cossacks, traditional defense and the support of the Russian statehood (an unthinkable phenomenon in Russian history!), and in Central Russia Russian nationalists managed to create their own autonomy with a population of 581,000 people and, together with the Germans, to resist the gangs of red terrorists [14];

  • After the war, the partisan anti-communist movement fought against the Soviet regime not only in Ukraine and Belarus, but also in the Russian republic of the USSR;
  • The anti-Soviet struggle was fought even by prisoners in the camps of the Gulag;
  • Under Khrushchev and Brezhnev, the struggle within the USSR was clearly declining, taking mainly forms of dissident clubs and youth subcultures, but the struggle of emigrants continued, and cases of their participation were known even in the war against the Soviets in Korea and Vietnam.

I allowed myself to take your time by enumerating these numerous examples so that you would understand: for a Russian nationalist they are the real Russia, unlike the USSR, her slaughterer and usurper.

For your final understanding of how – in the worldview of a Russian nationalist, the right conservative – the Soviet Union and the present-day Russia relate to each other, I cite a few quotations:

  • General P. Krasnov, the hero of the anti-Bolshevik resistance, the Don Ataman: “General Vrangel was not mistaken when he said “Goodbye, Motherland!” and not “Goodbye, Russia!”: Russia and the Russians sailed away with him on ships “;
  • Philosopher I. Ilyin: “The Soviet State is not Russia. This historical and political truth must be understood and felt once and for all and to the end “;
  • Writer B. Shiryaev: “The real Russian is not the Soviet, but the opposite, it is the antithesis to him”;
  • Writer I. Shmelev: “No foreign invasion can be worse for the Motherland than the power of Leninists and Stalinists. The USSR is definitely not Russia, but the enemy of Russia “.

[1] Unfortunately most of them are in Russian (but Google Translate is still with us J )

[2] 22 national republics, 4 national autonomous regions, 1 autonomous region

[3] Originally the author of the phrase was the emperor of the Russian Empire Alexander III





[8] For example, under Stalin, who returned epaulets and officer ranks to the army, and also partially “rehabilitated” the church. However, it should be understood that this body had no relation to the pre-revolutionary church, being completely under the control of the Soviet special services and often being headed by their employees


[10] A.Turkul «Drozdovsky under fire»

[11] ,



[14] See the map on the next page


4. Back to the USSR?

Thus, for Russian nationalists (if we mean exactly 1) right-wing nationalism, 2) ethnic nationalism, and not another imperial “supranational” utopia) the theme of the “red plague” is not just painful: in the question of defining “friend-or-foe”, support for the complete decommunization of Russia is one of the main criteria.

What do we see in modern Russia?

Famously, in 1991, after an unsuccessful coup attempt by a reactionary part of the Communist elite, which became the catalyst for the collapse of the Soviet system, the USSR crumbled. However, it is necessary to understand that concerning the “personnel” aspect the elite changed little in 1991 – it can be said that the Soviet nomenklatura, “repainted in new colors,” retained its political power. As for the dismantling of the communist system and its symbols, it usually happened at the will of the crowd, while the “leaders of the democratic opposition” for various reasons [1] often tried to contain these impulses (as it was, for example, with the demolition of the monument to F. Dzerzhinsky and the failed assault of the adjacent KGB headquarters) [2].

So, the new government had neither the interest nor the political will to conduct full-scale de-Sovietization, and the mood of the “masses of the people” underwent serious changes – especially after the “shock” socio-economic reforms of the early 1990s, as a result of which tens of millions of people Were below the poverty line. The vague desire for freedom was replaced by disappointment in democracy and longing for a “strong hand” and “great power”. As a result, what was not achieved in the period of “easy decommunization” in the 1990s, now is blossoming again in full bloom in Russia: finally “buried” in the official discourse are the ideas of the burial of V. Lenin mummy [3] and dismantling of his monuments, Which still stand in huge quantities in all cities of Russia (some are even being restored), in the form of Putin’s “Yunarmy”, in fact, the “pioneer organization” is being revived [4], The official mass media and school textbooks vie with each other to praise the charms of the Soviet system, and bookstores are littered with tons of waste paper telling about the “great Stalin and his wonderful reign”. The impulse, as always, comes from the very top: “The collapse of the USSR is the largest geopolitical catastrophe of the century [5]» – the statement by Vladimir Putin leaves no doubt about this.

5.The Day of Defeat

A very vivid manifestation of the cult of Soviets in Russia is the celebration of May 9 – the day of the victory of the USSR over the 3 Reich. In this war the Soviet Union lost 30 million people, left half of the country in ruins and homeless, and, most importantly, retained the power of the regime that destroyed and enslaved the population of this country before for almost a quarter of a century – i.e. not only did it not punish the Bolshevik executioners, but allowed this regime to continue to commit its terrible crimes…

What do the popular masses of the Russian Federation feel? The severity of the incurred losses? Aversion to total, fratricidal wars? The pain of the country of his grandfathers, crucified in those years between Stalin and Hitler? Reconciliation with the former “enemies” (after all, more than 70 years have passed, many generations have already changed, from those realities there is no trace)? Hate to the cannibalistic regime of the Communists, which had been rotting their grandfathers and grandmothers for 25 years, and then – together with Hitler – started the bloody redivision of Europe and the world?

Quite opposite, they are overwhelmed with pride for the “grandfathers-winners” (with whose corpses such red generals as Marshal G. Zhukov literally filled the German positions to obtain through “fearless offensives” honors and new titles), which is typically abundantly “warmed” by alcohol. Most of the “grandchildren of the winners” do not know anything about this war, which they are so proud of – they often do not even know Soviet propaganda tales like “28 Panfilovites” or “Gastello’s exploit”. Do not even know the names of their “heroes” – Soviet war criminals, such as Z. Kosmodemyanskaya [6] and A.Marinesco [7], exalted by Soviet and Russian propaganda as demigods.

If you look closely, it will not be difficult to find signs of hypocrisy, falsity, “fakeness” of this whole celebration. So, almost every year the regional authorities are disgraced, hanging the cities of Russia with banners, in which instead of depicted Soviet soldiers and military equipment there are, at best, American, but more often German ones, including those belonging to the Waffen SS. And the number of “veterans” (which are used as decoration of the holiday, to create an atmosphere of pomposity and solemnity) increases every year, and every year they are younger and younger – there are already a lot of “veterans” who are coevals of the Victory – it seems they “destroyed the Nazis” being in the mother’s womb or in cradle.

To complete the image of this “most sacred” holiday for Russians, it is worthwhile to show how it looks in reality – above all, with what respect they widely use the “sacred symbol of Victory” introduced a few years ago – the “St. George” black-and-orange ribbon (which for several centuries has been a part of the military awards of the Russian and then of the Soviet military) and other symbols:

A war veteran in his chic villa turns to the authorities with gratitude that they do not forget:

For comparison, let us cite the views of representatives of – without exaggeration – the “conscience of the Russian nation”, Russian intellectuals, real front-line soldiers, about this “victory”:

  • Nikulin, Russian and Soviet art critic, professor, member of the Russian Academy of Arts: «… Everywhere everything is the same. Indifference to the memory of the dead is the result of a general brutalization of the nation. Political arrests of many years, camps, collectivization, famine destroyed not only millions of people but also killed faith in good, justice and mercy. Cruelty to one’s own people in the war, millions of victims, easily killed on the battlefields, are phenomena of the same order. How can people respect the memory of their victims, with Pavlik Morozov [8] as their national hero ?! How can you blame people for their indifference to the bones of those who died in the war, if they destroyed their temples, abandoned and befouled their cemeteries? The war, which was conducted by the methods of concentration camps and collectivization, did not contribute to the development of humanity. Soldiers’ lives had no value at all … No monuments and memorials are able to convey the enormity of military losses, to truly perpetuate the myriad of senseless victims. The best memory for them is the truth about the war, a true story about what happened, the disclosure of archives, the publication of the names of those responsible for the disgrace.»
  • Astafiev, writer: «The Soviet militarists are the most rabid, the most cowardly, the most vile, the dumbest of all, which were before them in the world. It was them who “won” 1:10! It was them who threw our people, like straw, into a fire – and Russia was no more, and there is no Russian people either. What was Russia is now called Non-Black Earth, and all this is overgrown with weeds, and the remnants of our people fled to the city and turned into punks – they left the village but they did not reach the city. How many people were lost in the war? You know and remember. It’s scary to call the true figure, right? If to call, then instead of the ceremonial cap, one must wear a schema, get on knees on Victory Day in the middle of Russia and ask his people for forgiveness for the mediocre “won” war in which the enemy was bombarded with corpses, drowned in Russian blood.»[9]
  • Solzhenitsyn, writer, publicist, Nobel Prize laureate: «Many people passed through our prison cells in 1945-46, but they were not the ones who cooperated with Hitler, although some of them were also. There were no guilty, but only those who had just been in the West and were released from the German prison camps by the Americans. It was considered a crime – freed by the Americans. This means that he saw a good life. If he comes back, he will talk about it. The worst thing is not what he did, but what he will say. And all these persons received a ten-year term.».

However, this is a voice in the wilderness. Those who think so in Putin’s Russia are considered “traitors”, while some of them – for not enough “patriotic” reviews of propaganda films about the Second World – are even imprisoned [10].

May 9 can be called a truly unifying holiday – it really unites. It unites the insolent authorities – with their apologetics of Stalin and the “patriotic” calls “to rally around the Kremlin, like the grandfathers, before an external enemy” – and the people – miserable in their everyday impotence, stupid, lacking sense of measure and common sense, having nothing what he could be proud of in the present, and therefore willingly clinging to any myths about “greatness” and about the “sacred victory”, which are fed to him by the satisfied owners of the Kremlin.

A sticker “1941-1945 – we can repeat” is very popular in Russia: the death of millions of people, the ruined cities, famine and terror on both sides – all this through the prism of “victorious” sodomy. And by the way – does anyone still believe that homosexuality is hated in Russia?

[1] They themselves often explained their actions by the desire to “avoid blood”, “not to allow provocateurs,” but it is possible that the reason was different: they already saw themselves as rulers of the “new Russia” and therefore wanted “reconciliation” with the Soviet bureaucratic apparatus


[3] Currently, it is still in the mausoleum at the Kremlin walls on Red Square

[4] Soviet children’s organization, the Bolshevik analogue of Hitler Youth

[5] Not the “red terror”, not the Holodomor, not even World War II!

[6] The Soviet “partisan”, who burned (together with the inhabitants) villages of Russian peasants, in which German soldiers stayed. Issued to the Germans by local peasants (!) and executed.

[7] The commander of the Soviet submarine S-13, who sunk in January 1945 a ship on which there were several thousands of  German refugees – mostly women, old people and children

[8] One of the heroes of the Soviet propaganda: a kid who betrayed his own father for the sake of the communist cause




6.The Russian Federation is a growing Islamic, Asian state

The Muslim holidays of Uraza-Bairam (the Arab Eid al-Fitr) and Kurban-bairam (the Arab Eid al-Adha) are other important for understanding the essence of modern “RFia” holidays.

So, instead of thousands of words:

Moscow, the Russian capital


Saint-Petersburg, the «Northern Venice»…

As it is easy to guess, these holidays have a national scope in the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin congratulates Muslims with them every year (in 2015 he did it being in the mosque and reading aloud the Qur’an [1]). At the same time and in the place same significant words sounded: “Russia is the successor to the Golden Horde!” [2]. Residents of the currently rapidly Islamizing Russia can hardly argue with this statement.

And such “Muscovites” from year to year prevail in the heart of the capital, on Red Square, during the New Year:

Every year in Russia, the number of Muslims is growing rapidly, both due to visitors from Central Asia and the Caucasus, and due to a number of Muslim republics of the Russian Federation (mostly North Caucasian – ethnically and culturally alien to the Slavs, highly criminalized and corrupt – even by the standards of Russia). Already, they are about 6.5% of Muslims among the Russians (that is, not counting about 20 million immigrants), even according to official data.

Statistics of the economic portal RBC on immigrants in 2015: the total immigrants amount in Russia – from 10.2 to 20 million, illegal – from 3 to 10 million, illegal in Moscow – from 0.8 to 2 million.

An ordinary station of the Moscow metro. Nothing surprising.

Caucasian and silent Russian slaves. A very symbolic photo.

Crowd of V.Putin supporters: on the left – 2012, on the right – 2014.

Muslims, especially Caucasians, are very attracted by the service in the power structures of the Russian Federation. Their number in the law enforcement bodies of Russia is growing every year, they feel more and more confident there.

“Russian” policemen: Caucasian lezginka and Muslim namaz

The Russian army, so widely advertised, including abroad, especially after the Crimean events of 2014, is a separate story.

I have given below plenty of pictures of the relationship between Russian soldiers – ethnic Russians and ethnic minorities, mostly Muslims – so that you can really feel all the “power”, as well as the “Russian”, “Slavic”, “Nordic” spirit of the Putin’s army.

The most popular are humiliations of “brave Russian soldiers” by Muslim soldiers from Dagestan:

Chechens and Ingush (also the North Caucasus):

Other Caucasians (also predominantly Muslims) also do not stand aside:

The Islamist “finger up” (“Allah is One”) – this gesture is now considered a good form in this military unit

The same thing is done by even less “daring” Asians – Tajiks, Kalmucks, Kazakhs, Yakuts, etc.:

However, the most colorful “inter-ethnic climate” in Russia characterizes this incident that took place a year ago:

“Allah akbar!” – “Police, police, here is a woman wearing a hijab, with the head of a child in her hand!” – “No, it’s not interesting, it’s not a rally of Russian nationalists”

02/26/2016 Gulchekhra Bobokulova, a native of Uzbekistan, hired as a nanny for a 4-year-old girl in a Moscow family, cut off the head of her foster child and set fire to the apartment. During 40 (!) minutes, a woman wearing a black hijab and holding a bloody head of a child in her hand was walking along a busy street and urging passers-by to jihad “for Syria” until she was detained by the police. This happened near the entrance to the metro, in the prestigious district of Moscow, not far from the city center. It is noteworthy that at the trial Bobokulova was found insane and released from criminal liability for the acts committed. This means that the possible scenario is miraculous “healing” of the “nanny” in a few years and her release to freedom [3]. Comment is needless.

As in all the other thematic sections, those interested in the life of modern Russia can easily find on the Internet thousands of examples of both blatant behaviors – up to open terror – from “new Russians” towards ethnic Russians, and frankly anti-national policies of the state on this issue.

7. Chechnya is the winner over Russia

A separate, very colorful, story of Russia’s domestic policy is the relationship between the Kremlin and the Islamic republic of Chechnya. In the early 1990s, the leadership of the republic decided to withdraw from the Russian Federation, which was accompanied by internal clashes, ethnic cleansing of the “non-indigenous population [4]». For this reason, in 1994-96 the First Chechen War took place, and from 1999 until about the middle of the 2000s – the Second. As a result of the second war, part of the separatists led by A. Kadyrov swore allegiance to the then new Russian ruler, Vladimir Putin, promising him the stabilization of the situation in the region.

Instead, Putin did not just “forgive” the Chechen fighters, who had cut off the heads of the captured Russian soldiers days before, but assigned them “heroes of Russia”, while the most prominent Russian officers, famous for their battles with separatists and therefore hated by many in Chechnya, were imprisoned [5]. The Kadyrovs – first a father (he died as a result of the terrorist act in 2004), and then – the son – got practically unlimited power in the republic, and often – beyond its borders. There is a large number of Kadyrov’s conflicts with federal Russian ministries (for example, because of their inability to exercise their authority in the republic or because of disputes over the amount of federal “help” to the region) from which he invariably emerges a winner.

Chechnya – that produces almost nothing, the real “economic hole” of Russia, – due to multi-billion subsidies from the state budget [6] is, however, much richer than most regions of the Russian Federation – Spending huge money on construction of chic (quite tasteless) buildings or on one of the most expensive Russian teams – “Terek”. Kadyrov, in turn, lives as a small sheikh – with his palaces, army and hundreds of luxury cars.

It has long been obvious: Putin is afraid of Kadyrov.

R.Kadyrov and his army

This way, in the opinion of the leadership of Chechnya, a “respected person” should go.

Dances on the money of Russian taxpayers – the Chechen national tradition

Young R.Kadyrov is surrounded by Chechen terrorists, including the infamous S. Basayev, who, in particular,  captured in 1995 the hospital in the city of Budennovsk. About 150 people died, 415 were wounded.


And this is a street in Moscow and a bridge in St. Petersburg, named in honor of R. Kadyrov’s father – A. Kadyrov, also a terrorist who called on the Chechens “to kill as many Russians as you can.” It’s funny to hear after this the indignation of Russian politicians about the names of streets in the cities of other countries, isn’t it?

Is this Abu Dhabi? Maybe Doha? No, this is Grozny – the capital of Chechnya

 8.Whom does Russia belong to?

To understand the status of Russians in the modern Russia it is important to know who owns the national wealth of the country, primarily its minerals, the sale of which abroad constitutes the lion’s share of all export revenues of the state. For none of those who have any idea of modern Russia, it’s no secret that the Russian Federation has an openly kleptocratic regime. It is important to note that ethnic minorities occupy an important place among oligarchic groups controlling and consuming the country’s main wealth.

In 2014, Forbes magazine ranked the richest families in Russia [7]. We will quote it, indicating the ethnicity of the families:

  1. the Rothenbergs (5,55 млрд USD) – Jews;
  2. the Gutserievs (4,85 млрд USD) – Ingush (the North Caucasus);
  3. the Ananjevs (4,6 млрд USD) – Russians;
  4. the Sarkisovs (2,7 млрд USD) – Armenians;
  5. the Shaimievs (2,3 млрд USD) – Tatars;
  6. the Mutsoyevs (1,52 млрд USD) – Yezidis (the North Caucasus);
  7. the Magomedovs (1,4 млрд USD) – Avarians (the North Caucasus)
  8. the Bazhaevs (1,24 млрд USD) – Chechens (the North Caucasus);
  9. the Aminovs (1,12 млрд USD) – Jews;
  10. the Zubitskys (0,7 млрд USD) – Jews.

“9 kings of Russian real estate.” Of the 9 top-oligarchs of the real estate market – no one is ethnically Russian. A good illustration of 2013 from the portal Sputnik and Pogrom (at that time it could still be called nationalist and opposition).

A separate issue is the gradual expansion of China in the Russian Far East, which is supported by the Russian authorities. In addition to several islands on the Amur River, simply “donated” to the PRC during the years of Putin’s rule, the Kremlin took even more significant steps in this direction: in 2015, 115,000 hectares of agricultural land in the Trans-Baikal region were given to the Chinese for rent for 49 years. In addition, in the same Trans-Baikal region, for the same 49 years, 1,844,407 hectares of forests adjacent to the state border with China were leased for cutting by the Chinese [8]. For the sake of the Chinese expansion in the Far East, the Government of Russia specifically developed the concept of “territories of advanced development”, which provides, in particular, the possibility of importing foreign workers to such territory without any restrictions.

Most likely, in 49 years – given both China’s overpopulation (and the devastation of the Russian Far East) – these vast areas will be inhabited mainly by the Chinese. If not, our “Eastern brothers” (with their known “love” for ecology) will simply leave there a lifeless desert, taking all the resources away.

A clear picture. The title of the article reads: “China takes patronage over Transbaikalia. The Celestial Empire asks to ensure the resettlement of [its] citizens “

Such maps of China hang in Chinese schools. According to them, the Russian Far East is the territory of the PRC, and according to the official historical literature of China, “Siberia is Temporarily Lost Territory of the Celestial Empire”

9.Gay Parades: not approved, but have long become reality

Contrary to the stereotype (which is frequently encountered in the West) that the very possibility of gay pride parades in Russia is unthinkable, public actions of the “LGBT community” have long become part of the socio-political and cultural life of the modern Russia. At the same time, the notorious legal norm on the prohibition of propaganda of homosexuality among minors is rather a populist profanation of real struggle.

It makes no sense to go into detail in this issue, I will only give the two most colorful illustrations:




[4] 25 years ago, only about 70% of the population of the republic were Chechens, now – about 99%

[5] The most prominent of them was Colonel Yu. Budanov, a very popular military man in the army, who many times rescued whole troops of the Russian army by his decisive actions. He was accused of raping and killing a Chechen girl and after his release from prison in 2011 he was demonstratively killed in the center of Moscow. Despite the extraordinary popularity of Budanov among the people and the massive indignation of this event, only several hundred people from the 15 million-Moscow came to the funeral of Budanov in the summer of 2011… That is why the very question “Why there was no social uprise of Russians that days?”would sound ridiculous…

[6] According to R. Kadyrov, “It is Allah who gives him the money”



[9] One of the main Russian pop bands of the late 1990s and early 2000s, which gained national fame through the song “I’m crazy,” singing out lesbian “love”.


10. Russian death

Russia is the richest country. This is evident, in particular, according to the list of the Forbes rating, in which the Russian oligarchs still – despite the crisis and the fall of the ruble – “win prizes”.

Russia owns 40% of all natural resources of the planet, which are estimated by the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences at $ 350 trillion. or $ 2.5 million for each citizen of Russia.

At the beginning of Putin’s rule – in the early 2000s – Russia was given an unprecedented opportunity: energy prices, in particular, for oil (and, correspondingly, oil products, which accounted for the lion’s share of Russian exports), increased several times. For these 15 “obese years”, Russia could have made a dramatic breakthrough in development – investing in science, and finally making roads for the first time in history not a disaster, but an advantage of Russia. Instead, these riches were either stolen by Putin and his entourage, or spent on pointless events such as the Sochi 2014 Olympics. In the best case, the funds were invested in US securities and were used as a “stash for a rainy day” – i.e. for periods when the inefficient “petroeconomy” of the “northern gas station” was going through hard times.

Citizens of almost all resource-rich countries – from Norway and Canada to the UAE – receive their share from the sale of these natural resources. Russians can only dream about such distribution of income from the mineral resources.

Russia is getting poorer – almost half of the population lives (or rather dies) in poverty [1].

An illustration of the minimum wage in different countries (by far not the richest by European standards)

The central – actually “Russian” – part of Russia is gradually disappearing into oblivion.

The level of population decline in Russia: blue line – birth rate, red – mortality, green – natural increase

As you can see on the graph, at the beginning of 2010 the rate of extinction of Russia declined, reaching zero. Due to what – is seen in the following illustration:

So, we can see perfectly well: the North Caucasus (almost completely non-white and predominantly Muslim) and the Volga region (largely Muslim and non-Russian) reproduce most rapidly. The Russians have not ceased to die out – they are simply replaced by non-Russians. Let me remind you: this infographics does not take into account immigrants, and in fact, for example, the Moscow maternity homes are filled with women in childbirth from Central Asia and Transcaucasia.

Russia as a result of 2015 became the country with the largest HIV epidemic in the world, follows from the UNAIDS report, the UN structure on the prevention of this disease. In terms of the growth rate of new HIV cases, our country is ahead of the majority of the world’s states (including Uganda and Zimbabwe), while the Russian authorities continue to save on financing of drug procurement and prevention. [2]

The leader in this trend is the Middle Urals: in the city of Yekaterinburg 26 693 cases of HIV infection are registered, which is 1.8% of the population of the megacity – that is, every 50th citizen of Ekaterinburg. [3]

The Russians are taking to drink. According to Alexander Nemtsov, head of the Informatics and System Studies Department of the Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, in Russia up to 40% of the working-age population regularly abuse alcohol, alcoholism affects 2 million people, and alcohol poisonings, mostly vermic substitutes, – 500 thousand[4].

Drugs: according to the Federal Drug Control Service of the Russian Federation, in 2014 the drug consumption market in Russia is 8 million people (regular and occasional consumption), of which 3 million are actively consuming. Every month, 5,000 people die from drug addiction in Russia [5] .

As for education and healthcare, the state of affairs will best be shown by this infographics.

An illustration of the results of 15 years of Putin’s rule (2015): 24,000 schools are closed, as well as 4,800 hospitals, the same number of polyclinics, 2.2 million people died out.

But as for the temples and other real estate of the Russian Orthodox Church – every year there are more and more, because the ROC is a very powerful corporation, with serious business assets (including shady ones), state support and frank claims to power over society.

A clear picture of the development trends in Russia. Red indicates the number of churches, blue – schools, green – hospitals, yellow – clinics.

In order to see how and where “ordinary” Russia lives, outside the metropolitan areas of Moscow and St. Petersburg, just away from the “grand” avenues and tourist “windows,” it’s enough to take advantage of panoramas on Google Maps, and as for me – like In the previous paragraphs – I will show you the most illustrative pictures.

Typical courtyard in the center of a Russian provincial city

Do you feel the atmosphere of the holiday?

The usual news for the Russian hinterland: “In the Urals water with worms flows from the faucets “

Children Hospital. The inscription “Olympic Gamesare more important to us”

Ex-Eastern Prussia. Signed: “68 years ago here was the blossoming German city of Gerdau. Now – the Russian settlement Zheleznodorozhny»


Signed: “Russian Spring”

A dying out northern village

A typical Russian road away from federal routes

“House of Culture”…

Russian ghetto …

Outskirts of Moscow

Typical street of the Russian provincial city

No comments.

Russians are very fond of outdoor recreation …


The inscription on the wall: “Russia is super”

And now let’s look at the Russians themselves – those of them that are most suited to Putin’s regime and, as a rule, are the most zealous of his supporters:

Folk festivals: vodka from dirty sneakers and pancakes from shovels

Young mothers, pride of Russia

The inscription: “Russia, forward! We are Russians, God is with us! “

Wonderful rest

Children want to be like their parents

Son and a loving dad

In a warm family circle

These guys have a great future …

11.The project “Novorossia”: stupidity and neo-Bolshevism in the service of Putin

The Ukrainian Maidan of 2013-2014 was a real shock for the Kremlin. For people who are accustomed to perceive the people as serfs, the very idea that in their “backyard”, in “Little Russia” (which they are accustomed to consider their province and not a sovereign state), the people overthrows the dictator, their adherent and business partner, was unthinkable. Moreover, 2013 was not very prosperous in the economic sense. In these conditions it was necessary to teach a lesson – both to the “younger brother” who got out of control, and to his own people, who, in the opinion of the Kremlin paranoid, seemed to be able to decide to follow the example of Ukrainians. Ukraine had to be “punished”, and Russians – along with a colorful example of “what happens to rebels” – urgently had to get a “patriotic bonus” that could compensate for their beginning to deteriorate reality. Crimea (traditionally considered by the Russian masses “part of Russia, undeservedly presented to Ukraine”) for this came up perfectly.

The organic continuation of the Putin’s occupation and annexation of the Crimea, which met almost no resistance from the demoralized and disorganized post-revolutionary Ukraine, became the so-called “Russian Spring” in the South-East of Ukraine.

Fortunately, in Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkiv, Zaporizhya, Kherson, even in the infamous Odessa [6], and other cities of the South and East of Ukraine, thanks, first of all, to the active actions of the Ukrainian public, such a scenario was avoided.

Gloomy crowd of “Anti-Maidan”

Donbass – in view of the general “resentment” of its elites and part of the population on the Maidan (which pushed the local Donetsk oligarchy-criminal group Yanukovich away from power in the country), as well as significant criminalization of the region – in combination with the situation bordering on Russia and a large number of descendants of migrants from Central Russia [7] – appeared to be an easier target for Putin’s expansion represented by “pro-Russian” separatists.

End of February 2014 Donetsk Neo-Bolshevik separatists establish round-the-clock protection of the Lenin monument [8]

If we discard 1) motley propaganda demagogy, 2) the specific financial and economic interests of the leaders of this movement, then the main goals of the “Russian spring” as a mass movement were the following:

  • The split of “fascist Ukraine” and the annexation of the regions of the South and East of Ukraine to the Russian Federation (how much “Russian” this state is, we have already shown above);
  • The preservation and strengthening of the Soviet and post-Soviet “cultural coordinate system” (it was also colorfully described above), the suppression of Ukraine’s integration into Europe.

Spring 2014. Separatists in Kharkiv under red flags protect their idol – the founder of the USSR V. Lenin from the encroachments of Ukrainians and try to take the city under their control

Can these slogans – and moreover also implemented in practice in the form of an aggressive war against a neighboring, in a direct sense related (in Russia, few families in which there are no relatives in Ukraine) white people – be considered a manifestation of “Russian nationalism”, “Russian right idea”? The answer to this question, in my opinion, is obvious: no.

Very colorfulcharacters.

A portrait and a quotation of the main Stalinist executioner Beria (Georgian by nationality) in one of the institutions of the “DNR”

Remember the orcs from” The Lord of the Rings”

And these beautiful photos were made near the Malaysian Boeing, shot down by militant separatists in the summer of 2014:

Probably it’s also “Russian nationalists”, right?

The Soviet flag along with the imperial tricolor is the brightest example of “Donbass schizophrenia”

Well, “for dessert” – photos of very very “Russian” faces of the “Russian world” of the separatist Donbas:

That’s it, the “civil war” in Ukraine

«For Russian Donbass»…

«Russian» Yakuts or Buryats

«White Donbass. Faith. Russia. People»

«Russian» NegroStalinist

And this “Russian” Islamist from the North Caucasus was not very lucky

Two more, very “Russian” ones


The more surprising is the fact that in 2014, despite years of repression by the state, part of the Russian extreme right public supported this pro-Kremlin adventure. Who are those “strange nationalists”? Here are their main groups:

  • national-bolsheviks; the reason: Stalinism and “Imperialism” are part of their ideological platform [9];
  • part of “old-school fascists” of 1980-90-s (incl. orthodox fundamentalists and several paganist communities); the reason: all the movements of that time, formed mainly in Soviet times, in conditions of ideological isolation and general marginalization, were an example of ideological eclecticism, sometimes – a hodgepodge, the leitmotif of which, again, was an imperial, “great-power” idea;
  • newcomers (in particular, the audience of the site «Sputnik and Pogrom»[10]); the reason: in 2013-14 due to a number of resonant events in Russia itself (including clashes on national soil), a large number of young and “ideologically immature” people, who easily succumbed to these ideological manipulations in the spring of 2014, were involved in the nationalistic environment;
  • part of football hooligans; the reason: football fans have always been a fairly loose and volatile ideologically environment, and work with them has been conducted by the Presidential Administration since the early 2000s.

Representatives of the aforementioned categories probably took the bait of the myth (invented by themselves) about the creation of the “Russian national state” in Novorossia, although in practice there was nothing like this at all. To realize that they were deceived, it took the “right-wingers” many months, years … Someone have not understood the deception until now. And someone …was killed by their own “friends” [11].

12.Russians against «Novorossians»

However, it was clear to the vast majority of reasonable nationalists from the very beginning.

The most famous of the Russian right-wing political figures opposing “Novorossia”: D. Demushkin, A. Belov-Potkin, V. Basmanov, V. Istarhov, Y. Gorsky, B. Mironov, I. Mironov, A. Shiropayev, D. Konstantinov; Bloggers: D. Savvin, S. Loshkarev (Belogvardeets), Stanislav Morozov, Anton Skald and many others.

Radical appeal against “Novorossia” and in support of Ukrainian nationalists came also from the very authoritative in the Russian right environment prisoners – representatives of the autonomous resistance – the “Russian underground”, serving long (often lifelong) periods for loud actions of direct action: N. Korolev (grouping “SPAS” ), A. Voevodin (grouping “Combat Terrorist Organization”), V. Krivets, ABTO, Vokin Brothers and others.

Below are only a few illustrations of support from the Russian nationalists towards Ukraine, which opposes Putin’s aggression:

Nationalists from St. Petersburg help Ukrainians on the Maidan in the winter of 2014.

Nationalists from Russian Belgorod on the Maidan. Winter of 2014

Russian march in Vyatka (Kirov). On the banner there is the inscription “Stop lying, imprisoning and waging wars”, next to the flag of Ukraine.


Russian march in Ryazan

Moscow. Russian right-wingers in T-shirts of the Ukrainian regiment “AZOV”.

Moscow. “Russian May Day-2014”, the flag of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (“UPA”).

Kazan. ” Glory to Heroes” and the Ukrainian nationalist symbol of the idea of the Nation.

Graffiti from the famous Moscow right graphitist Umka. The inscription: “Brothers”.

Ryazan. “Glory to Ukraine”.

Vyatka (Kirov). ” Glory to Heroes ” and a trident.

“The Russians are against the war with Ukraine.” Russian nationalists take part in the multithousand antiwar “March of the World” in Moscow.

Other photos of the event

Often Russian nationalists use physical force against supporters of “Novorossia”. Here are some of well-known actions: in October 2014, in St. Petersburg, the ultra-right beat up a supporter of Novorossia, in the summer of 2015 an attack was carried out in Moscow on the Communist Patry tent for collecting “help” for Donbass, in St. Petersburg a truck of NOD (movement advocating escalation of aggression against Ukraine) was burned, and in Novosibirsk – another fan of Novorossia was beaten by nationalists.

Another part of Russian nationalists went even further – several hundred right-wing volunteers went to Ukraine (many illegally making their way through border posts) to fight against Putin’s “Russian world” in Ukrainian volunteer battalions: “Donbass”, “Right Sector”, “AZOV”, “OUN” and others. Some of them died in this war, many were wounded, all – became outcasts – in a foreign, poor country, divorced from their families and relatives, deprived of the opportunity to return home to Russia. How deep should there be hatred for the regime to force adults, often already socially held, to consciously take such actions?

Fighters of the Russian Insurgent Army – the formation of Russian volunteers fighting in the East of Ukraine against the pro-Kremlin separatists.

The unofficial flag of Russian volunteers fighting on the side of Ukraine.

Leaflets in memory of the fallen Russian fighters of the “AZOV” regiment

Farewell ceremony with the fallen Russian volunteer of the regiment “Azov”. Kiev, Independence Square.

Russian anti-Putinist volunteer near the pedestal of the liquidated Lenin monument

An 18-year-old schoolboy who fled to Ukraine from Russia to join the ranks of the “Right Sector”

Conclusion. Why do Russians trust Putin so much?

After all of the above, the question can not but arise: “How can a nation that makes up 80% of the population tolerate such a situation in its own country?”.

The main reasons for this are, in my opinion, two factors: 1) the lack of national self-awareness and 2) the paternalistic way of thinking. I will explain:

  • If in the minds of most Russians there is some kind of “national idea”, then this idea is “imperial”, state-centered, etatist. “True” nationalism (as an aspiration to fight for the rights of its own nation – above all against a repressive denationalized state), if it occurs in the mass consciousness, is mostly sporadic – as a reaction to strong emotional irritants such as terrorist attacks or high-profile murders – in this respect, the level of “ethnic consciousness” of Russians does not differ much from the one of Western Europeans;
  • Russians are extremely passive and inert. A Russian man in his mass is not inclined to take responsibility for his actions at all – it is much more convenient for him to feel above himself the absolute power of the “father of the tsar” and of his entourage, which, if failed, can be cursed. To understand the level of “civil activity” of Russians, the example of the already mentioned “Novorossia”, which was supported by the majority of the population of the Russian Federation, is typical: in reality the realization of this project has been dealing (thank God!) with the indifference not only of the state, but of society. Out of 140 million people, a couple of dozen volunteers went to Donbass (many of whom when they were already dead were buried like cattle in unmarked graves near Rostov – compare this with the way the funeral of the fallen soldiers of Ukraine are carried out), the amounts of “donations” are also not comparable neither with the population of Russia, nor with its riches.

Moreover, the current “psycho-emotional” state of Russian society – with his painful love for his own torturers and executioners (Ivan the terrible, Stalin, Putin, even Ramzan Kadyrov) – can be compared with the “Stockholm Syndrome”, burdened, in addition, with hatred to all countries that have escaped an unenviable fate, like Russia. In general, we see here a sort of “imperial sado-masochism” – a longing for the former “greatness” (“it is necessary that everybody all around is afraid of us”), aggravated by the subconscious feeling of the lack of a positive agenda for the development of the country as a unifying national idea [12].


Does it make sense to continue to believe in the illusory myth of the alleged “ideological confrontation between Putin and the left-liberal West” (which in fact is not, as I demonstrated above that Putin’s values in the aspects of interest do not differ much from the values of his “Western colleagues”), – everyone should answer this question for himself.

It should be understood that in this situation, any help to the modern Russian state means support not only for the aggressive policy of the Putin regime, which brings so many troubles and troubles to the surrounding (primarily European) countries, but also support for further enslavement and zombification of the Russian people, destruction in it of the last foci of truly national, European thinking.

If, summing up, I characterized Putin’s rule in one phrase, it would not be an exaggeration to say:

“Putin is the death of the Russian people and a serious threat to other countries.”

T-shirt of the Russian nationalist: “Military coup. We believe. We hope. We wait”

Recommended references:

Crimes of the regime:

Right-wing resources:



World war II, May 9:

The White movement:

Other interesting blogs about Putin and Russia:






[6] Dramatic events of 05/02/2014 Russian media and pro-Kremlin pseudo-patriots like to portray as “the genocide of Russians,” while keeping silent that (1) the clashes that day began with the shooting from the side of “peaceful anti-Maidan” demonstrators, which resulted in death of several Ukrainians, and (2) the national composition on both sides was absolutely diverse, which made the confrontation exceptionally political, not national.

[7] Moved there after the Holodomor of the 1930s, which depopulated the Ukrainian Donbass


[9] In the days when various movements were emerging and gaining ground in Russia, opposing the “creeping occupation” of the country from aliens from Central Asia and the Caucasus, who shortly before conducted the genocide of the Russian-speaking population in their republics, the NBP preferred to fight windmills, “inventing” the oppression of Russians in The Baltic States;

[10] This resource was in 2012-2013 one of the most promising in the “right Runet”. However, the frank “sagging” to the power made by its chief editor Yegor Prosvirinin because of fear of reprisals (at this time a criminal case on “extremism” was launched) during the Crimean events, put an end to this project as the voice of independent nationalists.

[11] “Volunteers” of Novorossia – a poorly managed conglomerate of mischievous adventurers – were and are a headache not only for the Ukrainian side, but also for the “curators” from the Kremlin, who aspire to subordinate the unrecognized “republics” as much as possible, and as for the most independent of their figures – to destroy them physically. Among the leaders of the separatists, already liquidated by Russian special services and their agents (all these actions, of course, are written off to “fantastically professional” Ukrainian saboteurs, although even the most naive Russians are unlikely to believe in these tales), there are such “legendary” commanders as: A. “Batman” Bednov, A. Mozgovoi, “Cossack Ataman” Dremov, leader of the Kharkov “Oplot” movement E. Zhilin (shot near Moscow), A. “Motorola” Pavlov, M. “Givi” Tolstykh, the head of the Lugansk police O. Anashchenko, former leader of the LNR V.Bolotov (poisoned in Moscow) and others.

[12] The best, in my opinion, graphic illustration of this worldview schizophrenia and insignificance of the Russian common man gave the report of Radio Liberty from an abandoned village in the Siberian taiga, a man who first complains about the life and arbitrariness of the authorities, the poverty of the richest country in the world, and then praises Putin and its aggressive foreign policy, including the war in Syria, costing the Russian budget hundreds of billions of dollars annually, because “America is threatening Russia”, and “everyone should be afraid of us”.

BOMBSHELL: Zionist Report’s First Book – Challenge Your Knowledge

This is the first book we published. We strongly recommend you read it. You might think you know history, but this book will surprise you without a doubt. It will take you by the hand and clearly show you, true history. This is not just ‘another book’ it is a book that exposes events in an orderly fashion and will make everyone open their eyes!

Karl Marx

VIDEO: The Red Terror In Russia

The Red Terror was a campaign of mass killings and gruesome atrocities carried out by the Bolsheviks. No other people have been as persecuted as Talmudic Jews, because everywhere they go, they bring destruction with them. Jewish Author Maurice Samuels says on page 155 of his book ‘You Gentiles’, “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.” “We have exterminated the property owners in Russia. We are going to do the same thing in Europe and America.” — The Jew, December 1925, Zinobit.


VIDEO: Terror Under The Jewish Bolshevik Forced Famine in Russia – 1921-1923

The horror of Lenin’s ‘Red Terror’ cumulating in Russia’s forced Famine (1921-23) and Ukraine’s 1st Holodomor (1921-22) served as a template for a second and third culling of Europe’s population. The 2nd Holodomor took place in 1932-1933, while the 3rd coincided with the murder of innocent European soldiers in 1946-1947. Excluding Russia’s multiple forced famines, the death toll of Ukraine’s 3 Holodomors exceeds 16.5 million.

Communism - Capitalism

COMMENTARY: Jews And Bolshevism – Names And Lists

Many years have gone by since the Bolshevik Revolution. If humanity had known back then what was really happening, things would have been very different for all of us. That is why the Jews made sure to infiltrate all aspects of society from the beginning, to slowly ‘erase’ the truth from our history books and our lives. This is why, many generations completely ignore what really happened and who are to blame, and it is the reason why history is repeating itself. 

It doesn’t take much research to see who controls today’s major banks, mainstream media, education, and basically everything that affects our daily lives, there is no doubt that the Jews are behind it. They control America and America has been influencing society for too long, the result is clear, a brainwashed society where there is no God, no family, no values and the only thing  people care of is themselves and ‘being happy’. 

Communism - Capitalism


“Jews and Bolshevism: Names and Lists,” Source:

Amongst themselves, the Jews are quite candid about their sympathy for and involvement in Bolshevism.

On 4 April 1919 the Jewish Chronicle: “There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the fact that so many Jews are Bolshevists, in the fact that the ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the finest ideals of Judaism.”

(Perhaps this explains why the Red Army uses a Jewish star as its symbol?)

Probably the best-known exposé of the Jewish role in the Bolshevik coup d’état was by Sir Winston Churchill, writing in the Illustrated Sunday Herald of 8 February 1920. Churchill wrote “With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and the driving power comes from Jewish leaders.”

Communism was of course founded by Karl Marx whose grandfather was a rabbi by the name of Mordeccai. Marx was given his initial encouragement by a Communist-Zionist by the name of Moses Hess. As founder and editor of the Rheinische Zeitung, the main organ of leftist thought in Germany, he provided Karl Marx with his first important platform. Later, in Brussels, he collaborated with Marx on The German Ideology. It was Hess too who converted to Communism Friedrich Engels, the wealthy textiles magnate who later subsidised Marx from the profits of sweated labour in Britain and Germany.

When the Bolsheviks overthrew the short-lived democratic government in Moscow and St. Petersburg in October 1917, it was a virtual Jewish coup d’état. The most prominent Jewish Commissar was Trotsky, real name Bronstein. He had been married by a rabbi in 1900, and whilst in exile in New York he had worked for Novy Mir, described in the Church Times (23 January 1925) as a “Yiddish newspaper.”

The various reporters and diplomats who were there at the time of the “Revolution” have given evidence as to its Jewish nature.

The widow of the Guardian’s correspondent Mrs. Ariadna Tyrkova-Williams wrote: “In the Soviet Republic all the committees and commissaries were filled with Jews.”

The most detailed description of Jewish influence in the Bolshevik ‘revolution comes from Robert Wilton, the Russian correspondent of The Times. In 1920 he published a book in French, Les Derniers Jours des Romanofs, which gave the racial background of all the members of the Soviet government. (This does not appear in the later English translation, for some odd reason.) After the publication of this monumental work, Wilton was ostracised by the press, and he died in poverty in 1925. He reported that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik Party was made up as follows:


Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Lourie (Larine) Jew
Ouritski Jew
Volodarski Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamanef) Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Sverdlof (Yankel) Jew
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Krylenko Russian
Lounatcharski Russian


“The Council of the People’s Commissars comprises the following:


President Ulyanov (Lenin) Russian
Foreign Affairs Tchitcherine Russian
Nationalities Djugashvili (Stalin) Georgian
Agriculture Protian Armenian
Economic Council Lourie (Larine) Jew
Food Schlichter Jew
Army & Navy Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
State Control Lander Jew
State Lands Kauffman Jew
Works V. Schmidt Jew
Social Relief E. Lelina (Knigissen) Jewess
Public Instruction Lounatcharsky Russian
Religions Spitzberg Jew
Interior Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Hygiene Anvelt Jew
Finance Isidore Goukovski Jew
Press Volodarski Jew
Elections Ouritski Jew
Justice I. Steinberg Jew
Refugees Fenigstein Jew
Refugees (assist.) Savitch Jew
Refugees (assist.) Zaslovski Jew


“The following is the list of members of the Central Executive Committee:


Sverdlov (president) Jew
Avanessof (sec.) Armenian
Bruno Lett
Babtchinski Jew
Bukharin Russian
Weinberg Jew
Gailiss Jew
Ganzburg Jew
Danichevski Jew
Starck German
Sachs Jew
Scheinmann Jew
Erdling Jew
Landauer Jew
Linder Jew
Wolach Czech
Dimanstein Jew
Encukidze Georgian
Ermann Jew
Joffe Jew
Karkline Jew
Knigissen Jew
Rosenfeldt (Kamenef) Jew
Apfelbaum (Zinovief) Jew
Krylenko Russian
KrassikofSachs Jew
Kaprik Jew
Kaoul Lett
Ulyanov (lenin) Russian
Latsis Jew
Lander Jew
Lounatcharski Russian
Peterson Lett
Peters Lett
Roudzoutas Jew
Rosine Jew
Smidovitch Jew
Stoutchka Lett
Nakhamkes (Steklof) Jew
Sosnovski Jew
Skrytnik Jew
Bronstein (Trotsky) Jew
Teodorovitch Jew
Terian Armenian
Ouritski Jew
Telechkine Russian
Feldmann Jew
Froumkine Jew
Souriupa Ukranian
Tchavtchevadze Georgian
Scheikmann Jew
Rosental Jew
Achkinazi Imeretian
Karakhane Karaim (Jew)
Rose Jew
Sobelson (Radek) Jew
Sclichter Jew
Schikolini Jew
Chklianski Jew
Levine (Pravdine) Jew


“The following is the list of members of the Extraordinary Commission of Moscow:


Dzerjinski (president) Pole
Peters (vice-president) Lett
Chklovski Jew
Kheifiss Jew
Zeistine Jew
Razmirovitch Jew
Kronberg Jew
Khaikina Jewess
Karlson Lett
Schaumann Jew
Leontovitch Jew
Jacob Goldine Jew
Glaperstein Jew
Kniggisen Jew
Latzis Lett
Schillenkuss Jew
Janson Lett
Rivkine Jew
Antonof Russian
Delafabre Jew
Tsitkine Jew
Roskirovitch Jew
G. Sverdlof Jew
Biesenski Jew
Blioumkine Jew
Alexandrevitch Russian
I. Model Jew
Routenberg Jew
Pines Jew
Sachs Jew
Daybol Lett
Saissoune Armenian
Deylkenen Lett
Liebert Jew
Vogel German
Zakiss Lett



Although Lenin is described as a “Russian,” in fact he was a mixture of various nationalities. It is likely that he was one-quarter Russian, one-quarter German, one-quarter Jewish and at least one-quarter Kalmuck (Mongol), which accounts for his Mongol appearance. Various authorities allege that his wife, Nadezhda Krupskaya was a Jewess and that her family spoke Yiddish in the home.

A report sent to the British government in 1918 by Mr. Oudendyke, the Dutch consul in St. Petersburg, said that “Bolshevism is organised and worked by Jews.” The report was included in a pamphlet published as a government White Paper in April 1919 entitled Russia No. 1 (1919) A Collection of Reports on Bolshevism in Russia. However, the pamphlet was quickly withdrawn and reissued with various excisions and alterations made.

In the War Records Division of the United States National Archives, there is filed a report from an American Intelligence operative in St. Petersburg. Under Record Group 20; Records of the American Expeditionary Forces Capt. Montgomery Schuyler, G2 Intelligence wrote, “The Bolshevik movement is and has been since its beginning, guided and controlled by Russian Jews of the greasiest type.”

Also in the U.S. National Archives are two telegrams sent by American diplomats in Russia. State Department document 861.00/1757 sent on 2 May 1918 by U.S. Consul Summers in Moscow relates, “Jews predominant in local Soviet government, anti-Jewish feeling growing among population.” Document 861.00/2205 from Consul Caldwell in Vladivostock on 5 July 1918 describes, “Fifty per cent of Soviet government in each town consists of Jews of worst type.”

In January, 1924, Lenin died from causes variously described as ‘a heart attack,’ brain hemorrhage’ and ‘syphilis.’ His comrades immediately began fighting amongst themselves to see who was to become his successor.

A relative outsider, Joseph Stalin, came to the fore and purged all competition either by exiling or executing them. Since Stalin was not Jewish, yet nearly all his opponents were, it is often suggested that Stalin was anti-Semitic. This is far from the truth.

Stalin had three wives, all of them Jewesses. The first was Ekaterina Svanidze who bore him one son, Jacob. His second wife was Kadya Allevijah. She bore him a son Vassili and a daughter Svetlana. His second wife died in mysterious circumstances, either by committing suicide or murdered by Stalin. His third wife was Rosa Kaganovich, the sister of Lazar Kaganovich, the head of Soviet industry. Stalin’s daughter (who in 1967 fled to the USA) then married Lazar’s son Mihail i.e. her step-mother’s nephew. Svetlana Stalin had a total of four husbands, three of them Jewish.

Stalin’s vice-president Molotov was also married to a Jewess, whose brother, Sam Karp, runs an export business in Connecticut. Just to complicate things even more, the Molotov’s (half-Jewish) daughter also called Svetlana was engaged to be married to Stalin’s son Vassili.

After the death of Stalin, his successors kept up the tradition, for a report in the B’nai B’rith Messenger relates: “To show that Russia treats its Jews well, Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev this week remarked at a reception at the Polish Embassy that not only he himself and Soviet President Klementi Voroshilov, but also half the members of the Praesidium have Jewish wives. Mr. Kruschev made this remark to Israeli Ambassador Joseph Avidar, who was amongst the guests.” (Kruschev’s wife was yet another Kaganovitch.)

According to a report in The Canadian Jewish News of 13 November 1964 the present Soviet boss Leonid Brezhnev is married to a Jewess, and his children are brought up as Jews. There are a number of prominent Jews in the Soviet government, including Dimitri Dymshits in charge of industry, Lev Shapiro regional secretary of Birobidjan, and Yuri Andropov in charge of the secret police, the KGB. In fact, every secret police chief in Soviet history has been a Jew, from the first Uritsky to the most recent, the murderous Beria. A Jew is also in charge of the Soviet economy – Leonid Kantorovich.

It is a well-known fact that the Bolsheviks were and are financed by Jewish interests in the West.

At a Bolshevik celebration rally in New York’s Carnegie Hall on the night of 23 March 1917, a telegram of support from Jacob Schiff of Kuhn, Loeb & Co. was read out. The telegram was reprinted in the next morning’s New York Times. Schiff later tried to deny his involvement, but thirty years later his grandson John admitted in the New York Journal-American (3 February 1949) that the old man had sunk twenty million dollars into the Bolshevik cause.

Another Western bankers who poured funds into Bolshevik Russia was Olaf Ashberg of the Stockholm Nia Banken. He remained the Soviets’ paymaster until the late 1940s. The London Evening Standard of 6 September 1948 reported a visit by Ashberg to Switzerland “for secret meetings with Swiss government officials and banking executives. Diplomatic circles describe Mr. Ashberg as the ‘Soviet banker’ who advanced large sums to Lenin and Trotsky in 1917. At the time of the revolution, Mr. Ashberg gave Trotsky money to form and equip the first unit of the Red Army.”

The Bolsheviks also received assistance from Armand Hammer, who still commutes back and forward between New York and Moscow to take care of his business interests in both communities. Hammer’s Occidental Oil Company is at the moment building a 1,600-mile chemicals pipeline in southern Russia. He is also on such good terms with the Soviets that he personally arranges for Soviet art galleries to lend paintings to America.

Another American-based businessman to help out the Soviet economy is Michael Fribourg, who owns the massive Continental Grain Company. Together with the Louis Dreyfus Corporation, these Jewish speculators were able to buy up vast quantities of cheap American grain in 1972, sell it to the Soviets at a vast profit, and collect an export subsidy from the U.S. taxpayer.

In every other East European country, it is exactly the same story:

In Hungary a Communist revolution was staged in 1919, instigated by the Jew Bela Kun (Cohen). During the three month regime, the country was turned upside down in a reign of murder and terror. Here again, the government was composed almost entirely of Jews. And it was this factor which brought about the regime’s downfall, as the ordinary Hungarians detested Jewish dictatorship. Kun was deposed and fled to the Soviet Union, where he became chief of the secret police, the Cheka, in southern Russia.

It was not until 1945 that the Jews were able to regain control. Three Russian Jews were installed as the ruling triumvirate, Matyas Rakosi (Rosencranz), Erno Gero (Singer) and Zoltan Vas. Both Rakosi and Gero had been members of Kun’s bloody government.

In Germany, the Jews also tried to take over there in the chaos that followed the First World War. Aided by funds from the Soviet Ambassador Joffe, Rosa Luxemburg’s Spartacus Bund attempted to overthrow the government. The revolt was quelled and its leaders Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht executed.

The post-war dictator of Roumania, Anna Pauker, was the daughter of a Bucharest kosher butcher. For a time she earned her living teaching Hebrew. Her father and brother now live in Israel.

Although Tito was the only non-Jewish dictator behind the Iron Curtain in the late 1940s, he was tutored by the Jew Mosa Pijade. According to John Gunther in Behind the Iron Curtain, “He is Tito’s mentor… Whatever ideological structure Tito may have, he got it from the shrewd old man.”

Moscow’s puppet government in Czechoslovakia in the late 1940s was run by another Jew, Rudolph Slansky.

In Poland too, Jews occupied virtually every position of authority in the post-war Communist regime. Prominent among these were Minc, Skryesewski, Modzelewski and Berman. Jacob Berman gradually eclipsed the others until he became supreme dictator by himself. Also, Gomulka’s wife was a Jewess.

Even in China, Soviet Jews were at work helping Mao Tse Tung. High up in the Political Department of the Red Army in China were W. N. Levitschev and J. B. Gamarnik.