DEBATE: Israel – It’s The End Of The World As We Know It

No matter how you look at current events, everything points the finger to the same evil provocateur “the tribe”. Peter Heller and Dr. E. Michael Jones debate about the sex scandals that recently hit Hollywood and the media. The Jewish controlled media, with Hollywood at the top, have been carrying out for over seven decades, a carefully planned “social engineering” to destroy Christianity. Can the world find its way back to tradition and moral values? Or is the destruction complete? It will certainly be if you let it. 

One World Religion

VIDEO: This Is How They Build The Antichrist World Church

Prophecy is being fulfilled right in front of our eyes, and many still do not see it! Pope Francis is a false prophet and he is preparing the world for the Antichrist. Please spread the word! 


COMMENTARY: Freudian Fraud – Sex And Psychoanalysis

For those who have taken the time to educate themselves on Cultural Marxism, there is no doubt that psychoanalysis has played a major role in the deep brainwashing of the masses and the slow destruction of Christianity and everything it stands for. The tribe has been ‘possessing’ souls for decades leading most to their own destruction. Today, we are at a point where most cannot distinguish right from wrong anymore because their perception of reality has been completely distorted finding themselves persuaded into accepting things that in a normal and decent world they would have never accepted.  

Before the tribe was able to gain this level of infiltration, people used to reach out to their families or the Church for guidance. But this unconditional love and support have been slowly replaced for the exclusive adoration of the Self, leaving us surrounded with ‘material pleasures’ but lonely and empty inside. Most of us have seen how the family unit, the only entity capable of giving unconditional love and support has been destroyed. This pushes people to look for outside help when finding themselves alone. That is when they end up opening the doors of their soul to strangers who have already been brainwashed and trained in these evil practices and possess no moral values nor the capacity to help people get back on the right path. The result is the society we live in, totally corrupted and desperately running towards its own self-destruction. 


“Freudian Fraud: Sex and Psychoanalysis,” Source:

On his way to America in 1909, Sigmund Freud declared: “We are bringing them the plague.”[1] That plague was none other than psychoanalysis.

Psychoanalysis, in its whole scope, is or was a system that sought to subvert classical psychology, which started with the Greeks and which was to a large extent based on reason. Psychology progressively began to be viewed as an academic exercise for smuggling in Jewish ideology. As E. Michael Jones puts it,

“The redefinition of psychology was a revolution in the truest sense of the word. What was up went down, and what was down went up. Before that revolution, reason sat on instinct like a rider on a horse.”[2]

When reason lost its proper place, Jewish psychology—or shall we say psychoanalysis—began to unleash a plethora of sexual instinct upon mankind. Sigmund Freud played a big role in bringing about this transformation. The ethics of this form of psychology, as Heinze argues, is neither Greek nor German or Western, but it has a Judaic ring to it.[3]

Almost every serious thinker knew that Freud’s entire project was not science. In fact, he was working against Western culture, and to work against Western culture he had to smuggle in what Jewish scholar David Bakan of York University calls “Jewish mysticism.”[4] Jewish writer Chaim Bermant similarly wrote that Freud’s “very definition of the Id, the Ego and the Super Ego correspond in many ways to the three different gradations of the spirit—the nefesh, ruach and neshamah—outlined in the Kabbalah, which does not mean that Freud was himself a Kabbalist, but something of the Kabbalistic tradition of inquiry seems to have affected his outlook.”[5] Scholars such as Michael Eigen hold similar views.[6]

Freud, in fact, had a secret library in which he housed books on the Kabbala, and a copy of the Zohar,[7] which is “the most important document in Jewish mysticism,” and which, among other things, “taught the Jews to sacrifice Christian virgins for God’s pleasure.”[8]

In addition, Freud took part in the B’nai B’rith lodge in Vienna, and “among his recreations was his weekly game of tarot, a popular card game based on Kabbala.”[9]

Freud used scientific pretensions to unleash a venom—psychoanalysis—upon the Western world. Freud, like Jung, left the scientific field and went into “Jewish mysticism” in order to inflict vengeance on Christianity. Peter Gay declares that Freud develop“fantasies of revenge.”[10] Those fantasies of revenge were later grounded in the Illuminati. As E. Michael Jones points out:

““Psychoanalysis and Illuminism were, in effect the same project—the Illuminist term Seelenanalyse is simply the Germanified term of psychoanalysis or vice versa—with the details changed to suit the sensibilities of a later age, an age which believed that ‘science’ and ‘medicine,’ rather than secret societies, would lead to heaven on earth.

“Both psychoanalysis and Illuminism engaged in what a later critic called ‘Seelenspionage,’ spying on the soul…Psychoanalysis adopted all of the essential characteristics of Illuminist mind control, but Illuminism can just as easily be seen as an early form of psychoanalysis, a project long cherished by the Enlightenment.”[11]

This certainly makes sense, since both Nietzsche and Freud, according to many accounts, made some form of Faustian pact.[12] David Bakan found this side of Freud very strange, and some scholars tried to explain some of these phenomena away in terms of Freud’s Super-Ego.[13]

But there is enough evidence to say that Freud was up to something. On January 3, 1897, he declared that “I am not afraid I can take on all the devils in hell,” and goes on to declare that “sexuality” would be one of his weapons “from heaven through the world to hell.[14]

When he began to say goodbye to scientific exploration which he had acquired in anatomy and physiology and began to wander in a fantasy dream, “he became more of a stranger to his colleagues. They could see no link whatever between those years of solid and fruitful medical research and his new interests and methods.

“Later, many psychoanalysts used to take the opposite view of the first part of Freud’s working life: they looked at it as a time spent in a foreign land, at best a period of preparation, at worst a waste of precious years as far as psycho-analysis was concerned.”[15]

These “fantasies of revenge” were actualized in the development of psychoanalysis, which Freud later labeled “the plague.” Like Hannibal, who had vowed to make Rome pay, Freud had sworn to make Christianity pay, which he identified as the Catholic Church. Hence, psychoanalysis was Freud’s potent weapon.

Knowing full well that he was not dealing with scientific enterprise anymore, Freud told Fliess, “you take the biological, I the psychological.”[16] Freud, in his own words, saw the “outline of Lucifer-Armor coming into sight at the darkest center.”[17]

And this becomes very interesting as the story begins to unfold. Freud—sounding like Karl Marx who made a Faustian pact in order to take the world into perdition[18]—saw himself as a Semite who would eventually conquer Rome for his “Christian” tradition:

“My longing for Rome is, by the way, deeply neurotic. It is connected with my high school hero-worship of the Semitic Hannibal, and this year I did not reach Rome any more than he did from the Lake Trasimeno.”


Sigmund Freud

Frederick Crews of the University of California has recently declared that Sigmund Freud, according to the Daily Mail, is “the most-vile, medically useless, misogynistic, snobbish, petulant, jealous, crazy, sex-obsessed creep you could ever hope not to look up at from a couch — and a man whose ‘treatment’ you wouldn’t wish on your worst enemy.”[19]

Freud, according to Crews, sexually abused his younger sister and fell in love with his own mother. Freud wrote a letter to his friend Wilhelm Fliess saying,

“I have found, in my own case, the phenomenon of being in love with my mother and jealous of my father, and I now consider it a universal event in early childhood.”[20]

Freud was a cocaine addict and even promoted it as an alternative medicine. Crews deduces that this addiction clouded his moral and intellectual judgment. Aleister Crowley would have almost certainly disagreed. In The Book of the Law, which Crowley said was inspired by an entity that communicated through him, we read:

“I am the Snake that giveth Knowledge & Delight and bright glory, and stir the hearts of men with drunkenness. To worship me take wine and strange drugs whereof I will tell my prophet, and be drunk thereof! Be strong, o man! Lust, enjoy all things of sense and rapture: fear not that any God shall deny thee of this.”[21]

What is essentially important here is that Crowley viewed “strange drugs” as a doorway to the occult. Occult historian Colin Wilson adds:

“All over northern Europe traditional art shows the fairy-people and sorcerers surrounded by mushrooms, usually the ‘liberty cap’ mushroom, now identified as psilocybin, the same used by Native American shamans for around 4000 years.

“The Irish Gaelic name for this fabulous fungus, Pokeen, means little god…Crowley spoke for this tradition when he said true religion always invokes Dionysus, Aphrodite and the Muses, which he also called ‘wine, women and song.’”[22]

In any event, Freud’s conception of sexuality was completely weird:

“So, when a young woman, Emma Eckstein, came to see him with an aching leg and bad period pains, he forced her story into line with his current theory that ‘a misconstrued erotic incident, having befallen a virgin prior to the onset of sexual awareness, gets suppressed and thereby becomes a cause of hysteria, but only when a second such incident reawakens that memory and renders it horrifying’.

“If a patient didn’t come up with a nice pre-pubescent erotic incident, he or she was being ‘resistant’. After many hours of probing, Freud eventually managed to get Emma to admit that a shopkeeper had once tried to grab her genitals when she was a child.

“At the same time, Freud had latched on to the theory that the nose was the ‘control center for other organs and their maladies’. He diagnosed Emma with a double-syndrome, ‘hystero-neurasthenia’, the neurosis-part brought on by masturbation (Freud’s pet-hate).

“The treatment? The surgical removal of a bone from the poor girl’s nose. Emma hemorrhaged blood. A month later, she was still bleeding profusely. Freud worked out that her bleeding came from ‘sexual longing — expressing her desires through spurts of blood.

“This was typical. Freud went through a phase of doing ‘pressure treatment’ on women’s foreheads and bodies in his darkened consulting room, telling them to remove any tight clothing and then searching their bodies for their ‘hystereogenic zones’, while coercing them to tell him details of their sexual history.”[23]

If you think this is disgusting enough, then you ain’t seen nothing yet. Freud “had a weird theory that women — all women — were sinister creatures whose vagina threatened to castrate any male who crossed its threshold. He divined that the secret ambition of every female was to acquire the ‘envied penis’ by severing it.”[24]

Obviously, this isn’t scholarship. This is subversive stuff, and Freud knew this very well. There was no way for Freud to get a professorship with these ideas, therefore he “bribed his way to a professorship at Vienna University…”[25]

David Cronenberg’s A Dangerous Method

Freud has had a tremendously powerful influence on the culture, particularly in Hollywood. Movies such as A Clockwork Orange (1971, Stanley Kubrick), Black Swan (2006, Darren Aronofsky), Where The Wild Things Are (2009, Spike Jonze), The Science of Sleep (2006, Michel Gondry), Eternal Sunshine of The Spotless Mind (2004, Michel Gondry), Persona (1966, Ingmar Bergman), The Paradise Trilogy (2012 & 2013, Uldrich Seidl), Repulsion (1965, Roman Polanski), Shame (2011, Steve McQueen), We Need to Talk about Kevin (2011, Lynne Ramsay), A Dangerous Method (2011, David Cronenberg), have all been influenced by Freud’s ideas in one way or another.

The solution to all this madness is the moral law, which is ingrained in the human heart. Any attack on the moral law is a direct attack on practical reason, and any attack on practical reason is a direct attack on human beings. Since Freud was at war against Logos, he was also at war against all mankind.

In that sense, he proves that St. Paul was right all along, that people like Freud “work against all humanity.”The reason anti-Jewish reaction will continue to rise everywhere because these people are working with an essentially diabolical system which seeks to steal, kill, and destroy.

  • [1] Quoted in Richard Noll, The Jung Cult: Origins of a Charismatic Movement (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994), 47.
  • [2] E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 921.
  • [3] Andrew R. Heinze, Jews and the American Soul (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 72.
  • [4] David Bakan, Freud and Mystical Tradition (New York: Dover Publications, 2004), 25.
  • [5] Bermant, The Jews (New York: Times Books, 1977), 121.
  • [6] Michael Eigen, Kabbalah and Psychoanalysis (London: Karnac Books, 2012).
  • [7] Bakan, Freud and Mystical Tradition, xviii.
  • [8] Ibid., 29.
  • [9] Ibid., 48.
  • [10] See Jones, Life and Work of Freud, 22-23
  • [11] E. Michael Jones, Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control (South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press, 2000), 126-127.
  • [12] See for example Paul Vitz, Sigmund Freud’s Christian Unconscious (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1993); Armand Nicholi, The Question of God: C. S. Lewis and Sigmund Freud Debate God, Love, Sex, and the Meaning of Life (New York: Free Press, 2002).
  • [13] Bakan, Freud and Mystical Tradition, 211-212.
  • [14] Ibid., 222-223.
  • [15]  Bakan, Freud and Mystical Tradition, 8.
  • [16] Ibid., 225.
  • [17] Ibid., 229.
  • [18] See Robert Payne, Marx (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1968); Johnson, Intellectuals(New York: Harper & Row, 1987).
  • [19] “Was Sigmund Freud really just a sex-mad old fraud? The founder of psychoanalysis was a money-obsessed cocaine addict who groped women patients and had a genius for self-promotion,” Daily Mail, November 2, 2017.
  • [20] Ibid.
  • [21] Aleister Crowley, The Book of the Law (New York: Weiser Books, 1976), 31.
  • [22] Quoted in John Carter, Sex and Rockets: The Occult World of Jack Parsons (Port Townsend, WA: Feral House, 1999), xviii
  • [23] “Was Sigmund Freud really just a sex-mad old fraud? The founder of psychoanalysis was a money-obsessed cocaine addict who groped women patients and had a genius for self-promotion,” Daily Mail, November 2, 2017.
  • [24] Ibid.
  • [25] Ibid.



Soviet Union

VIDEO: Psychological Warfare & Subversion Cultural Marxism, Islamism And Feminism

This is a great educational video that exposes the entire process of subversion, its tactics, its goals and how it has slowly corroded society. Is there a way out of this vicious circle? There is, and it takes EDUCATING the masses. Please share as much as you possibly can. Take the lead and help others see the truth.

Enjoy communism

DOCUMENTARY: Communist Infiltration Of The United States

The Bolshevik Revolution was financed by international Jewry who had already taken over Wall Street. Ever since then, Communism has been slowly infiltrating America and corrupting it from within. Today we can say that America is a country LED by Communism disguised as a democracy. What is important to keep in mind, is that those who are in power, are part of the plan, they have a mission and it is NOT TO SAVE AMERICA. If they truly had the intention to save the country, the tribe would not allow them to be in power. Every move that America makes is being directed from Russia. In the meantime, the brainwashing and the destruction from within continues.

We highly recommend this documentary and ask you to please share it with as many people as you possibly can. Americans have the right to know the truth.

Breitbart - Netanyahu

COMMENTARY: Alt Right … Jewish Controlled Opposition

It is clear that there is no more press. It is left to us, who know the truth, to expose it and continue trying to help others see through the evil lies. The world is becoming a very dark place and it will get worse before it gets better. We need to help each other see what is going on, there is no other solution for this horrible evil infiltration perpetrated by the Synagogue of Satan. They control it ALL. 

Breitbart - Netanyahu

The Conservative Party and the Conservative Movement in the US consist of the Neocons, the Christian right, and the libertarian right. Some would include the so-called Paleoconservatives a term coined by the Jew Paul Gottfried

Neocons are ardent Zionists, the Christian Right due to religious links are generally pro Jewish the libertarians are jew neutral  What was needed was a co-opting of the white nationalists. That’s what the alt-right movement is trying to do

Coopt white nationalists and turn them into pro-Jew zombies and destroy anti-Jewish ideas in white nationalists by ”making Jews white”

The Washington Post defines the alt-right as “a largely online movement of right-wing ideologies that presents itself as an alternative to mainstream conservatives.”

Yahoo News said the alt-right is rooted in the white nationalist movement of the 1980s and 1990s and that “it postulates that the culture of white America is under attack, and sees itself as its defender.”

Wikipedia says The alt-right is a loose group of people with far-right ideologies who reject mainstream conservatism in the United States. The writings of the group are largely Internet-based and are found on websites such as 4chan and 8chan. Members of the alt-right use websites like Twitter and Breitbart News to convey their message.

The alt-right has no formal ideology, although various sources have stated that white nationalism is fundamental. The movement has been associated with multiple ideologies from American nationalism, neo-monarchists to men’s rights advocates and people who oppose mainstream conservatism.


The leading lights of the so-called Alt Right movement are Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer


Jewish “Advisor” Paul Gottfried

The term Alt right (Alternative Right) was first used in 2008 by Jewish Professor (another in the long line of Jewish “Advisors”) Paul Gottfried while addressing the H. L. Mencken Club about what he called “the alternative right”. Remember it was Gottfried the Jew who alsocoined the term Paleoconservative.

It’s no coincidence that both the terms coined by the Jewish Professor are so commonly and frequently used by the media

The term, however, is most commonly attributed to Richard B. Spencer, president of the National Policy Institute and founder of Alternative Right.

spence  c5bbd-jackdonovan

Richard Spencer and gay Jack Donovan

Richard Spencer is rumored to be gay and has twice invited gay weirdo &”White Rights Activist” Jack Donovan to his National Institute Organization Conference A Google search of Richard Spencer’s wife turns up a load of pictures ……of Spencer with men and more men Richard Spencer is probably earning top shekels for his role.

Spencer says he “respectsIsrael” and that, in regard to whether the U.S. Embassy should be moved from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, “Wherever Israel wants to declare its capital, I would respect that.” Spencer is non-committal over the potential role of American Jewish billionaire Sheldon Adelson in advising Trump, and likewise on the active role of Trump’s (Jewish) son-in-law, JaredKushner, in the president-elect’s transition team. “I don’t have a strong position on this, that is his business,” says Spencer Source 


In an older 2010 article called An Alliance with the Jews he quotes a Serbian White Nationalist Srđa Trifković  to explain why Multi Culturism sponsored by the likes of the ADL Foxman and Jewish Liberals could become very bad for the Jews, who will be viewed by Black and Brown as a particularly annoying version of Whitey.

Quote, To put it bluntly, the survival of the West, which is recognizably Christian in spirit and European in genes, is “objectively” becoming the optimal survival strategy for the Jewish community as a whole, Israel included. In the postmodern mélange of races, cultures, and cults still desired by the likes of Abraham Foxman, the narrative of victimhood and its associated claims will carrylittleweight with the brown, black, and yellow multitudes blissfully devoid of European self-loathing, guilt and shame. EndQuote

What Trifkovich (and Spencer) don’t or won’t recognize is the Jews are already working on implanting the Jewish narrative of victim-hood on the browns black and yellow multitudes.

Spencer then suggests the solution

QUOTE With the prospect of American politics slipping out of control, and non-Whites commanding nuclear weapons and a massive military arsenal, Israelihardlinersmight much prefer that the extremeRightwasin charge of things. It (Extreme Right) would extricate the U.S. military from the Middle East, and wouldn’t likely express strong opinions about who wins or who loses in various land disputes in the region. Israelis might learn to prefer such an isolationist regime, which wouldgivethem (Israel) freehand, as opposed to the ever-meddling Democrats and Republicans. Alliances are about ensuring your survival and defeating your enemies. Israel’s fruitful relationship with the South African Apartheid government, which included the sharing of nuclear intelligence and material, should serve as a model in this regard. Who knows? Israelinationalists might want to HELPFINANCE the far Right in Europe and North America. Certainly, if the two camps could grasp that their interests are complementary, an improbable grand alliance might be in the cards. ENDQUOTE

By 2016 it seems All Judaan’s did start sponsoring the likes of Spencer. Its media did hype him. Spencer’s use is not as some white knight of the White Nationalist movement but as yet another usefuldupe to the greater Jew cause of scaringJewishliberals at the risk of melting into the American melting pot turn back into the Jewish fold to continue being the same racist “stiff-necked people”

Another leading light of the Alt-Right movement is JaredTaylor who is the founder and editor of American Renaissance. Taylor is also an author and the president of American Renaissance’s parent organization, New Century Foundation, through which many of his books have been published. He is a former member of the advisory board of The Occidental Quarterly, and a former director of the National Policy Institute, a Virginia-based white nationalist think tank. He is married/living with a woman named Evelyn Rich who some say is Jewish and who went to the extraordinary extent of  publishinga letter in the Jew-dominated Southern Poverty Law Center  SPLC explaining that she wasn’t Jewish

Now why a supposed hate tracking group like SPLC would publish a letter by the wife/partner of a supposed antisemitic racist is something only the SPLC can answer


Taylors views on Jews are clearly spelled out in his magazine American Review

QUOTE, I started American Renaissance 17 years ago in order to awaken whites to the crisis they face and to encourage them to unite in defending their legitimate interests as a race. ENDQUOTE



The leading media outlet for the Alt-Right movement is Breitbart News. Breitbart was founded by Jew Andrew Breitbart and these were his motives for starting the website


Here’s Breitbart describingitself pictorially


Its CEO Larry Solov and Editor in Chief Joel Pollak are both Jewish Israel Firsters

Stephen Bannon its former CEO  who had previously worked in GoldmanSachs was chosen by Trump as his “Strategic Advisor”

Jewish talking heads complained loudly about Trump choosing another AntiSemite

Which would be a good time to put up this old Jewish Telegraph Agency tweet about Bannon


The article the tweet links to says  QUOTE Stephen Bannon said in 2014 that racism would eventually get washed outof right-wing nationalist movements and spoke repeatedly of Western society being built on “Judeo-Christian”ideas. In a question-and-answer session he gave at a conference at the Vatican in 2014 that was unearthed by BuzzFeed News, Bannon downplayed concerns of antiSemitism and racism in European right-wing nationalist parties, suggesting that bigots were on the fringes of those movements and would fade away. ENDQUOTE

Two of the Alt-Right and Breibart’s star’s ‘ Milo Yiannopoulos
and Mike Cernovich are Jewish despite Wikipedia trying to cover up Cernovich’s Jewishness. Milo also happens to be gay (Someone at Bretbartsld let love bloom and lock up Milo, Richard Spencer and Jack Donovan in a room). More Breitbart regulars include the professional Islamophobes, Jews David Horowitz and Pamela 


The whole plan seems to be to infiltrate and reduce the White Nationalist movement into a rabid Black Arab and Muslim hating bunch of thugs while “liberal” Jews will go on “helping” these groups with Open Borders refugee-friendly policies etc.

All the while paid jew shills will indulge in silly childish jew baiting in the cyber and real world, the jew media will howl in righteous indignation about the rise of “Anti Semitism”


Related post Europe’s kosher nationalist parties  

Bishop Hon

COMMENTARY: Radical Leftist Pope-Francis Ousts Anti-Communist Bishop From Key Post

Pope Francis is not a true Pope but a LIAR, a BLASPHEMER and a SERVANT OF SATAN. These are just a few of many other attributes that describe this false prophet who was put in the Vatican by those who worship Christ’s number one enemy.

Bishop Hon

“Radical leftist Pope-Francis ousts anti-communist bishop from key post,” Source:
Rolling out the tired, old “we’re all immigrants” mantraPope Francis continues to wreak havoc as he community-organizes the Roman Catholic church.

The latest outrage comes in the form of the pope’s September 28 decision to fire Archbishop Savio Hon Tai-Fai, the Secretary of the Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples at the Vatican. As a result of this power play, the 67-year-old archbishop, who has no diplomatic experience, is going to Athens, Greece, to become the papal nuncio, or ambassador, to the Hellenic Republic.

Archbishop Hon is apparently being sacrificed by Francis as an overture to the Communist Chinese. Hon is from Hong Kong and is the highest-ranking official of Chinese origin in the Vatican, the Epoch Times reports.

As the French newspaper La Croix noted, Archbishop Hon has been one of the most senior bishops opposed to Pope Francis’ policy of rapprochement with the Chinese regime. His position at the Vatican’s Propaganda Fide, where he served for seven years since being appointed there by previous Pope Benedict XVI in 2010, was a powerful post as that put him second-in-command in the Vatican body that directly governs Vatican’s missionary works.

The Vatican and the People’s Republic of China have had no diplomatic relations since 1951, as the Chinese Communist Party insisted from the very beginning of its rule that all bishops of the Roman Catholic Church in mainland China should be appointed by itself so as to maintain control. Instead, a regime-controlled Chinese Patriotic Catholic Association (CPCA) was created to supposedly represent Catholics in China, yet the CPCA has never been recognized by the Vatican.

Francis is a hero to the radical Left because he is one of them. Although the Left vindictively led the charge against the Catholic church during the various sexual abuse scandals, it now has this pope’s back because, except for abortion, he agrees with leftists. For example, the Salon website, a hotbed of hostility to organized religion (except Islam), has switched sides. Salon has been running stories sympathetic to the pope with titles like “The transcendent compassion of Pope Francis” (by leftist mud-hurler Joan Walsh, no less), “Twitter tells the tale: Pope Francis’ speech does not sit well with the conservative ‘intelligentsia,’” and “5 new ways Pope Francis is sticking it to the Christian right.”

Francis is a hero to the radical Left

Francis is solidly plugged into the American Left. In the summer of 2015, community organizers from PICO and SEIU thugs flew to Rome to collaborate with Vatican officials in advance of the pope’s visit, as the National Catholic Reporter reported.

During his visit to the United States, Francis lectured federal lawmakers on the supposed deficiencies of U.S. immigration policy, implying that this country, the most immigrant-friendly nation in the world, treats immigrants badly.

The pope dubiously connected American “sins and the errors of the past” against American Indians with the treatment of immigrants today, imploring the nation not to repeat these “sins” in current dealings with immigrants.

Rolling out the tired, old “we’re all immigrants” mantra, Francis said:

In recent centuries, millions of people came to this land to pursue their dream of building a future in freedom. We, the people of this continent, are not fearful of foreigners, because most of us were once foreigners. I say this to you as the son of immigrants, knowing that so many of you are also descended from immigrants. Tragically, the rights of those who were here long before us were not always respected. … Those first contacts were often turbulent and violent, but it is difficult to judge the past by the criteria of the present. Nonetheless, when the stranger in our midst appeals to us, we must not repeat the sins and the errors of the past. We must resolve now to live as nobly and as justly as possible, as we educate new generations not to turn their back on our “neighbors” and everything around us.

The suggestion that America is anti-immigrant or is not profusely kind to immigrants is a baseless smear. The number of immigrants the U.S. admits has long been completely in line with or higher than other Western nations. The U.S. Department of State even claims this country “accepts more legal immigrants as permanent residents than the rest of the world combined.”

But Pope Francis, an ardent leftist, has an ideological agenda so facts are of little importance to him.

EXCLUSIVE: The Propagation of the People

“It is in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its incarnation. But the goyim states have not known how to make use of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining ourselves in the shade,” The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No. 2. 

“The press, which, with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands,” The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, Protocol No. 7.

In this modern era of luxury and convenience, what is the most common and perhaps the most cherished household item? You guessed it, the television. The TV not only provides a seemingly endless source of entertainment for the masses, it also represents the establishment’s primary tool of propaganda implementation. Televised entertainment serves to distract the common people from the poverty in which they live, or from the actions of their government. In ancient Rome, these distractions were known as “bread and circuses.” People tend to temporarily ignore squalor when adequately amused.

Not only does the television, among other forms of media, distract from what’s going on in the world, it also uses mental manipulation to slowly and subtly ingrain political ideologies into the minds of the audience over time. Sure, a binge session of The Walking Dead or Game of Thrones might seem harmless, when in reality, it is shaping the ideals of the people away from what truly gives a nation strength. The propaganda can easily be seen in almost all mainstream media, if one knows what to look for.

The motive behind the propaganda is quite transparent: the degeneration of society, the abolition of morality, the acceptance of homosexuality/incest/pedophilia, the implementation of political-correctness, the defamation of Christianity, the destruction of rights, and the spread of fear. A nation is strongest when it’s people come from Christian households in which parents embrace traditional, biological gender roles. A nation is strongest when homosexuality is considered an abomination and is dealt with accordingly. A nation is strongest when the morals of the people trump the desires of the individual. A nation is strongest when the people are engaged in heterosexual marriages and armed. It becomes blatantly obvious that the ideals promoted in the propagated media are the very ideals of Jewish Communism.

To demonstrate the aforementioned plot to degenerate society, take a look at this trailer for the highly-anticipated Netflix original series Big Mouth.

This show is clearly an embarrassment to the human race. The series is obviously too explicit for children, yet no sane adult would want to watch a show about a bunch of teenagers going through puberty. This show not only pushes the acceptance of moral decay and homosexuality, but the acceptance of pedophilia as well. At the end they actually show the vagina of a child. Disgusting. This show has a 100% review rating on Rotten Tomatoes; an attempt to normalize such atrocities in the eyes of the people. It is no coincidence that the primary creators of the show are Jewish. More on Big Mouth here.

Now that we can see the motives of the propaganda, what corporations are pulling the strings?

90% of the media is owned by the six companies listed above. They dominate every aspect of the media. Cable sitcoms, ALL mainstream news, children’s entertainment, sports, and Hollywood are all ruled by these media giants. What do all six of these corporations have in common? They are all owned, operated, or founded by Jews. Don’t take my word for it, look it up for yourself. You will find my assertion to be accurate. Thus, one group of people own all the media. That is far too much power for a single entity. The quotations from The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, at the beginning of the article, accurately describe the current day situation; they were written over one hundred years ago.

Nial Brandt is an American Patriot, Gun-Owner, and contributor for He can be reached at


Catalunya and Israel

COMMENTARY: Catalan Independence Advocate Looks To Israel, Germany For Funding

How will Catalunya survive if it separates from Spain? Who loves chaos, wants destruction and has all the money in the world? You guessed it right! Israhell. Let’s face it, the Jews are simply NOT happy with Spain, there are too many Catholics for whom the family unit and tradition are sacred. They need to destroy this. The ‘independentistas’ movement is mainly comprised of brainwashed useful idiots and Zionist puppets. The Jews told us many centuries ago, they destroy from within and this is exactly what they are doing. Cataluña will end up separating from Spain and this will be the beginning of a domino effect in Europe. 


Catalunya and Israel

“Catalan independence advocate looks to Israel, Germany for funding,” Source: 

Israel and Germany may be key to initially financing a Catalan state independent from Spain, a judicial advocate for a sovereign Catalonia has recently suggested.

Barcelona High Court Judge Santiago Vidal said in the November-December edition of the local Delta magazine that the “facts indicate” that within three years a Catalan state could establish independence through “legal, political and peaceful means.”

Without initial membership in the European Union, an independent Catalan state could not appeal to the Central Bank of Europe to finance its debts, said Vidal, a member of a pro-Catalan independence expert group.

“But there is a solution for this,” Vidal said in the interview adding that “another state with solvency, basically speaking of Israel and Germany, will serve as our temporary bank.”

Vidal downplayed the interviewer’s doubts over whether it was “risky” to believe Israel would back a country seeking independence, given the Palestinian issue.

He stated that “the Palestinian issue is characterized by violence. Whereas, the Catalan issue is characterized by civic lessons, pacifism and the doing of good things that we are giving to the whole world. And this is something the Israelis like very much.”

Vidal gained attention in October when he faced possible persecution over his said pro bono work drafting a Catalan constitution proposal.

He noted in the interview that between 2016 and the end of 2017 “a judicial constitution would be presented for this new state, with or without a deal” with Madrid.

A long-standing breakaway movement in Catalonia, which accounts for one-fifth of Spain’s economic output and has its own distinct culture and language, grew in strength during the recent years of deep recession.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Viva Catalonia, Viva Israel,” Source:

A flood of rejoicing people, a sea of striped red and yellow flags, a forest of posters, a few “middle fingers,” and one simple message: “Catalonia is Europe’s new country.” That is how the largest independent demonstration ever held in Barcelona looked recently.
The carnival atmosphere at the gathering – held on Catalonia’s national day, the Diada – was mixed with strong feelings that this is a historic moment. About one-fifth of the population of Catalonia – 1.5 million people – participated in the demonstration. They wanted to prove that the independence of the region with the greatest economic power in Spain is no longer an exotic idea that preoccupies only the margins of Catalan politics. Recently published surveys have proven that there is no mistake here: There has been a dramatic reversal in public opinion: 51 percent of Catalans now want to say “Adios, Espana” (only 19 percent are opposed).

When you add to that the fact that Xabi, Iniesta and Messi, Barca players, are already decked out in a uniform (their second one, for the time being ) in the colors of the Catalan flag; when you include the warnings that government leaders in Madrid hastened to dispatch to Barcelona, and the urgent call for national unity issued by King Juan Carlos – then it is clear that the Iberian kingdom is in real danger.

In order to understand that, we have to follow the money. In Madrid the acute recession, the declining economy and the 25 percent unemployment rate led to the great Indignados protest; in Catalonia, they led to a strengthening of the separatist movement, whose support has doubled since the outbreak of the crisis. The Catalans are tired of “carrying the poor regions of Spain on their backs.” They claim that 9 percent of their annual GDP – about 16 billion euros – disappear into the coffers of the central government in Madrid. They feel that they are being robbed and are demanding to collect their own taxes.

But according to the separatists, “It’s the economy, stupid” is only one of the issues. The main problem is the alienation of the central government. “Our honor and our freedom are central to the awakening,” says Alfons Lopez Tena, the leader of Catalan Solidarity for Independence and one of the leaders of the separatist movement, in a phone conversation. “Even without the economic crisis we would win a majority now.”

He and his Catalan colleagues accuse the conservative ruling Popular Party and its socialist predecessor of acts intended to undermine their language and their culture; they claim that by its actions the Spanish establishment has put an end to the “state of autonomies” that was established in Spain after the fall of Franco. Last week Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy summarily dismissed the Catalans’ demand to collect their own taxes, providing yet more proof of the fact that he wants to exploit the crisis to restore Spain to the era of centralization, claim the Catalans.

The boomerang is already on the way: The Catalans will give their answers to Rajoy on November 25, the day of the early elections, which were announced this week by Catalan President Artur Mas, and are meant to bypass the Spanish constitution and serve as a national referendum on the independence of the region.

The hot potato will soon end up in the lap of the European Union. The paradox is that despite the euro crisis, the supra-national umbrella that the EU provides to its members encourages separatist movements to dismantle the veteran national edifice and replace it with a framework that allows for self-determination within the European meta-framework.

Spain will not easily give up its crown jewel, but Lopez Tena is losing no time in making a promise that Europe’s new member state will be very friendly to Israel. In that too it will separate itself from its rival in Madrid. And here is another message. Just as Catalonia will soon be the state of the Catalan people, Israel is first and foremost the state of the Jewish people. There is no future for a binational state. The latest victory of the separatists in Quebec, Canada, the continuing efforts to dismantle the Belgian kingdom, and the national referendum to take place in Scotland in 2014 are only a few examples that prove this. Neither a federation nor a confederation, nor autonomy, nor cantons.

Binationalism is dead. Visca (Viva in Catalan) Israel, Visca Catalonia.


“Catalan leader predicts independence in about two years, and close friendship with Israel,” Source:

Almost exactly five years ago, in September 2007, Spain’s King Juan Carlos paid a visit to Catalonia. Hundreds of separatists staged a turbulent protest against him. Some burned likenesses of the Spanish monarch. The separatist protest dovetailed with another noisy event – the satirical weekly El Jueves published a racy caricature of the king’s son, Prince Felipe, having sex with his wife. As though that were not enough, Catholic and conservative forces in Spain issued calls for the annulment of the monarchy. The monarchy became a viable political target; suddenly, the future of the institution seemed cloudy.
Right around this time, another Iberian “king” paid a visit to Israel. This was Jordi Pujol, who is known as “King Pujol” in Catalonia; for almost a quarter of a century, he headed affairs in the autonomous region, converting a land that was trampled and oppressed under the Franco regime into the country’s most prosperous area. During his visit, “the father of the Catalan nation” who retired in 2003 as the region’s president, explained to Haaretz that the Catalans were fed up with the country’s central government. They were angry about their region’s outdated infrastructure and felt alienated by the way the regime in Madrid put obstacles in their path, blocking Catalan bids for more autonomy, Pujol added.
Pujol, who is now 82, always preached and acted in ways that accentuated Catalan distinctiveness, yet he long opposed Catalan independence, dismissing that goal as an absurdity. His “subjects” sided with that outlook, for the most part. For this reason, Pujol emphatically told Haaretz, “No danger is posed to the unity of the Spanish kingdom. There is no danger now, and there won’t be for the next 50 years.”
Yet kings are not always endowed with the gift of prophecy. Some 1.5 million people, about a fifth of Catalonia’s population, turned out three weeks ago for the largest independence demonstration ever to be staged in Barcelona. One of those participants was a certain Jordi Pujol. His successor, Catalan Prime Minister Artur Mas, decided last week to hold regional elections in November 2012, two years ahead of time. His goal is to turn the elections into a referendum on Catalan independence. Officially, the Spanish constitution bans such a referendum.
Conducted against the backdrop of Spain’s acute economic crisis, polls released around the time of the huge demonstration in Barcelona indicate that 51 percent of Catalans currently support separation from the kingdom. Only 19 percent of Catalan respondents oppose independence. Does this mean that the economic crisis that has toppled close to a dozen governments in Europe might actually bring about the collapse of one the European Union’s member states?
Alfons Lopez Tena, one of the main leaders of the separatist movement, has no doubts on this issue. Speaking in a telephone interview with Haaretz, Lopez Tena, who heads the Catalan Solidarity for Independence party, stated emphatically: “Within two to five years, Catalonia will be an independent state.”
For 21 years, Lopez Tena was a member of the Convergence and Union (CiU) party, which was headed by Pujol and is now headed by Mas. He quit this party two years ago and founded a new, more militant party.
“The CiU didn’t do enough on behalf of independence and to improve our status in Spain,” he explains. “The moment it joined the regional parliament, in 2010, our party won four seats; I expect that the party will now strengthen itself dramatically. That’s because unlike past elections, this campaign will focus on the question of independence, and not on social issues. We’ve proven that we take a hard line on this [independence] issue.”
Q: Support for the separatist movement has doubled since the economic crisis erupted in 2008. Do you owe your popularity to the millions of unemployed workers and an economy that is likely to shrink another 2 percent this year?
“It would be a mistake to attribute our popularity solely to the economic crisis. That’s just one of many topics. The main subject is the attitude displayed toward us by the Spanish central government. It relates to us as a minority that doesn’t deserve equal rights. Our honor and freedom is what stands at the center of this awakening of the separatist movement. Even had the economic crisis not occurred, we’d still win a majority today. Catalans today are united: We literally have no common language with the Spaniards.”
Q: In the business community, many believe that Catalonia cannot survive on its own, owing to its great dependence on Spain.
“That’s a completely erroneous view. Our exports are equal to those of Spain, while imports are double those of Spain. Our GDP is equivalent to that of Israel or Denmark and double that of Slovakia, for example.”
Q: “Catalonia, the newest state in Europe” was the lead slogan of the recent independence demonstration in Barcelona. But Spain is liable to veto Catalonia’s inclusion in the EU and an EU spokesman has clarified that the organization is not set up in a way that would allow it automatically to accept for membership a state that has splintered from one of its member nations.
“All of the Catalan parties want to become part of the EU. Since we are today part of that organization, we believe it will accept us as a full member. The statements made by the spokesman you mention have been denied [by EU officials]. The EU did not express opposition when the question of Flemish independence was under consideration; nor did it call for Scotland to scrap the referendum it plans to hold in 2014, which could lead to its departure from the United Kingdom.”
Q: Historical experience teaches that separation is a contagious phenomenon. What sort of connections do you maintain with other separatist movements in Europe, and outside of the continent?
“We have close connections with the Flemish, and recently the possibility of devising joint  strategy with the SNP (Scottish National Party) was discussed at a joint conference that  included Basque, Sardinian and Corsican participants. We don’t have any connection with Kosovo or any other Balkan state that was on the other side of the Iron Curtain, and whose culture is unlike that which developed in Western Europe. We have forged contact with Quebec – the separatist movement in Quebec is a model for us. But in contrast to the situation in Canada (and Britain), Spain does not allow us to stage referenda about independence. Thus, we need support from the EU, the United States and the international community as a whole.”
Q: Unlike the Basque movement, you have never resorted to violent struggle. Might this change, should Madrid frustrate your campaign for independence?
“We would under no condition follow that [violent] path. That’s not how things are done in a democratic country. We initiated cooperation with the Basque only after members of that movement decided two years ago to abandon the use of terror. Before that time, we only conducted unofficial talks with them, and in these talks, we urged them to desist from the use of terror; we made it clear that in the absence of such a renunciation of violence, we would not collaborate with them.”
Q: The population of Spain as a whole is considered very pro-Palestinian, but in Catalonia, particularly among separatists, many figures are very supportive of Israel. Why is this so?
“Israel sought independence and gained it. It revived its language and has for 65 years dealt with the hostility of the nations surrounding it. That explains our support of Israel and the Jewish people. On a personal level, I define myself as being pro-Israel and pro-Zionist.  These are views I inherited, in my family. I well remember the concern that filled our house at the time of the Six Day War. I was a boy at the time, 10 years old, and we all prayed for Israel’s survival.”
Q: But today the Palestinians are the ones seeking independence.
“At least half of the members of my party are members of the Catalan Friends of Israel Association. Israel is a democratic state, and we support the steps it takes for survival and the survival of the Jewish people. We have no intention of criticizing what its government does. We seek cooperation with Israel, and we hope it will support our independence movement. It is clear that an independent Catalonia will be a close friend of Israel – there’s no doubt about that.”

COMMENTARY: When Did Congress Vote To Aid The Saudi’s Yemen War

We keep saying it and we will continue saying it, these ‘wars’ are Israel’s wars, they are Communist wars to gain more control and power. America has been Israel’s prostitute for TOO LONG and the only ones to be blamed for it are the IGNORANT American people who don’t take the time to see what their country has become. Either they STAND UP NOW TO THIS EVIL TRIBE or the world will continue to hate them until we end up destroying each other, fulfilling the tribe’s dream. America ISRAEL WANTS TO DESTROY YOU, SO DOES RUSSIA, because Israel (with the help of American traitors and dual citizenship Israelis) along with Russia have always been THE SAME THING. 


“When Did Congress Vote to Aid the Saudi’s Yemen War?,” Source:

The bill introduced by a bipartisan group of House members last week to end the direct U.S. military role in the Saudi coalition war in Yemen guarantees that the House of Representatives will vote for the first time on the single most important element of U.S. involvement in the war—the refueling of Saudi coalition planes systematically bombing Yemeni civilian targets.

In doing so, moreover, the bipartisan bill, H. Con. Res. 81, will provide a major test of Congressional will to uphold the War Powers Act of 1973, which reasserted a Congressional role in restraining presidential power to enter into wars without its approval in the wake of the Vietnam War debacle.
Since the Obama administration gave the green light to the Saudi war of destruction in Yemen in March 2015, it has been widely recognized by both Congress and the news media that U.S. military personnel have been supplying the bombs used by Saudi coalition planes. But what has seldom been openly discussed is that the U.S. Air Force has been providing the mid-air refueling for every Saudi coalition bombing sortie in Yemen, without which the war would quickly grind to a halt.
The Obama administration, and especially the Pentagon and the U.S. military, became nervous about public statements about that direct U.S. military role in the Saudi war after some legal experts began to raise the issue internally of potential U.S. legal responsibility for apparent war crimes in Yemen. Refueling Saudi coalition bombing missions “not only makes the U.S. a party to the Yemen conflict, but could also lead to U.S. personnel being found complicit in coalition war crimes,” Kristine Beckerle, Yemen and UAE researcher at Human Rights Watch, has observed.
The political sensitivity of that direct and vital U.S. military role in the Saudi coalition airstrikes was so great in the last year of the Obama administration that U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power, in an interview with a New Zealand journalist twice declared, deceptively, “We are not involved in carrying out airstrikes in Yemen.”
The bill introduced by Democratic Representatives Ro Khanna of California and Mark Pocan of Wisconsin, and Republican Representatives Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Walter Jones of North Carolina, calls for Congress to “direct” the president to “remove” U.S. military personnel from their role in the Saudi air war against the forces of the Houthi-Saleh alliance in Yemen. It would give the President 30 days in which to end the U.S. military role in support of the Saudi-led war in Yemen unless and until Congress has enacted either a declaration of war or an authorization of those activities.
The co-sponsors believe members will support it because U.S. direct involvement in the Saudi war of destruction in Yemen has enmeshed the United States in the world’s worst man-made humanitarian crisis in many years. Some 542,000 Yemenis, already weakened by starvation, have now succumbed to a cholera epidemic that is far worse than any in the world for the past fifty years, as the New York Times reported in August.
The starvation and cholera epidemic are the consequences of a multi-faceted strategy aimed at creating such civilian suffering as to finally break the resistance of the Houthi-Saleh forces. The Saudi strategy has included:
  • Targeting of hospitals, markets, and agricultural infrastructure.
  • Destruction of cranes necessary to offload any large-scale humanitarian assistance at the main port of Hodeida and refusal to replace them with new cranes.
  • A naval blockade that has strictly limited shipping of food, fuel and other necessities to Hodeida port.
  • Closing down the civilian airport to prevent delivery of humanitarian aid.
  • Destruction of roads and bridges necessary for delivery of humanitarian aid.
  • Closing down the Central Bank of Yemen – the only institution in Yemen that was providing liquidity to millions of Yemenis.

Another selling point for H. Con Res. 81 is that it is based explicitly on the language of the War Powers Act of 1973, passed by a two-thirds majority in the House overriding a veto by President Richard M. Nixon. The War Powers Act includes a provision that, “[A]t any time that United States Armed Forces are engaged in hostilities outside the territory of the United States, its possessions and territories without a declaration of war or specific statutory authorization, such forces shall be removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent resolution.” 

The proposed bill argues that the direct U.S. military involvement in the Saudi Yemen war has never been authorized by Congress and that the provision in the war powers act is therefore applicable. It specifically exempts U.S. forces operating in Yemen against al Qaeda, which was authorized under the 2001 Authorization for Military Force (AUMF) and which have not generated critical public and Congressional reactions.

Con. Res. 81 applies a provision of the War Powers Act to ensure that opponents in the Foreign Affairs Committee or the majority leadership won’t be able to keep it bottled up without a vote. The War Powers Act puts any proposed Congressional resolution for action regarding an unauthorized use of force on a fast track for an early floor vote, making it a “priority resolution.” Once the measure is referred to the House or Senate foreign affairs committee, the War Powers Act requires that the committee report out a resolution within fifteen days and that the resolution must then come to a vote within three days.

Aides say the co-sponsors will present the measure as a response to a policy initiated and carried out for nearly two years by the Obama administration.They say a number of Republican offices are now seriously considering co-sponsorship of H. Con. Res. 81.

In addition to the humanitarian disaster and war powers issues linked to the direct U.S. military role in Saudi airstrikes, the co-sponsors will be pointing to multiple ways the U.S. role in the war makes the American people less secure, according to Congressional aides. One of the effects of the war has been to enormously strengthen the position of Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), considered the biggest single foreign threat to carry out terrorist actions against the United States after two failed efforts in recent years. Saudi-backed Yemeni forces have been fighting alongside AQAP against the Houthis-Saleh forces. And the war has given AQAP much greater territorial control, political legitimacy and access to money and arms than it ever had before.

Yet another argument is the longer-term hatred of the United States that the U.S. direct involvement in the Saudi bombing campaign and starvation strategy is creating. Sen. Chris Murphy of Connecticut told CNN’s Jake Tapper in June 2016, “If you talk to Yemenis, they will tell you, this is not perceived to be a Saudi bombing campaign. This is perceived to be a U.S. bombing campaign. What’s happening is that we are helping to radicalize the Yemeni population against the United States.”

Lawrence Wilkerson, former Chief of Staff to Colin Powell, has been meeting with Republican House members to urge them to support the bill. “The war being waged in Saudi Arabia with U.S. assistance is brutal and vicious, and it is a losing one for both the U.S. and Saudi Arabia but a boon for AQAP,” Wilkerson said in an interview with TAC. “It should cease immediately.”

But sponsors and advocates of H. Con. Res. 81 may have to refute arguments about Iran that the Saudis and the Obama administration have used to justify the Saudi war in Yemen. Wilkerson noted Republican members who cited Iran’s alleged role in the Houthi war effort and the common U.S.-Saudi opposition to it. “They argue that the Saudis are doing our work for us, so we’ve got to hold our nose and support them,” said Wilkerson.

But that argument reflects a false narrative created by the Obama administration that Iran has been arming the Houthis for years.  Administration officials used a UN panel obviously set up at Washington’s behest to recycle old and demonstrably fabricated claims of Iranian arms shipments to the Houthis. The Houthis have undoubtedly obtained missiles and other weapons from Iran, but the UN panel of experts on Yemen reported in January 2017 that it did not have sufficient evidence to “confirm any direct large-scale supply of arms” from Iran to the Houthis.   

More importantly, the modest military assistance from Iran came in response to the Saudi coalition air assault on Yemen—not the other way around. And contrary to the official Pentagon myth of a “proxy war” against Iran in Yemen, the Houthis are fighting the Saudis for Yemeni interests—not to serve Iranian interests.