DOCUMENTARY: “Things We Won’t Say About Race That Are True”

This documentary, mind you by Channel 4, brings up many interesting and true points about race relations in the United Kingdom. Nonetheless, and of course, it doesn’t address the real core of these race-related societal problems (eg. why it is happening, who encourages it, etc.). It is a daft propaganda piece aiming for the British public to accept all of this change as the new normal. This is illustrated by their conclusion at 1:02:04 — listen closely.

The Codenhove-Kalgari Plan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHu4zZH_IPA&t

DOCUMENTARY: Auschwitz Vs. Science

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gM1Wa2MT1as&t

1. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which was written in history on the basis of military tribunals where the victors judged the vanquished and that accepted as evidence absurd allegations such as human skin lampshades, human soap, blowing an experimental village with 20,000 Jews…

2. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide in which it is claimed that the perpetrators somehow managed to commit a perfect murder x 6,000,000 by destroying all evidence and using an unknown code language to submit orders and plans.

3. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which claims a systematic industrial extermination in novel extermination weapons such as gas vans, gas chambers, diesel chambers, steam chambers, incinerators, etc. yet none of those weapons are ever found nor do they leave pictures, blueprints or construction orders.

4. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which is peddled by people who by their own accounts were treated in hospitals in so-called “extermination camps”.

5. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which is “trademarked” and which has become a multi-billion dollar industry.

6. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which is still used today as one of the most powerful political weapons even invented.

7. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which has been elevated to a religious status, including a religious dogmatic number, shrines, pilgrimages, martyrs, and saints.

8. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide that will get you excommunicated (best case) or jailed (worst case) if you doubt its veracity.

9. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide which has changed the official story radically over the years yet we are always told that this is the absolute truth etched in stone which nobody is supposed to question.

10. The Holocaust is the only genocide which relies on Soviet sources (anybody who ever lived in the Soviet Union would tell you how the “truth” is determined over there).

11. The Holocaust is the only claimed genocide where no debate is allowed, scientific inquiry is suppressed and the heretics are persecuted.

12. The Holocau$t is the only claimed genocide where millions can be reduced from the total claimed to be killed’ but the total figure always remains SIX MILLION!

Enjoy communism

DOCUMENTARY: Communist Infiltration Of The United States

The Bolshevik Revolution was financed by international Jewry who had already taken over Wall Street. Ever since then, Communism has been slowly infiltrating America and corrupting it from within. Today we can say that America is a country LED by Communism disguised as a democracy. What is important to keep in mind, is that those who are in power, are part of the plan, they have a mission and it is NOT TO SAVE AMERICA. If they truly had the intention to save the country, the tribe would not allow them to be in power. Every move that America makes is being directed from Russia. In the meantime, the brainwashing and the destruction from within continues.

We highly recommend this documentary and ask you to please share it with as many people as you possibly can. Americans have the right to know the truth. 

https://youtu.be/tc8Qg8v-tS0

Soviet Islam

COMMENTARY: Soviet Islam – The Real Story

It is sickening to see how Communism infiltrates everything like a virus. The HUGE problem we see with this documentary is that THEY FORGET TO NAME THE ENEMY which is the TRIBE and that is who Putin and Trump BELONG TO and who they follow orders from. The Tribe is the creator of Communism, NO ONE ELSE BUT THEM and their Satanic religion.

However, if you keep in mind, while watching the documentary, that the Jews created Communism and that their end goal is world dominion, and that THEY ARE BEHIND ALL THE DECEPTION ON ALL SIDES, you will better understand the twisted game they are playing.

There are many truths being exposed here about the Communist infiltration of Islam.

Those who side with Putin against the filth America has become, fail to see that America was hijacked by the same evil who hijacked Russia, Europe, South America, the UK, etc. and America is being USED as scapegoat to further their agenda.

These Communist Jews want COMPLETELY DESTROY THE WEST, by confusing and leading us to destroy each other, so THE GOYIM can become their servants and they can bring the new savior that will be Communism also called a One World Government under a a One World Religion ruled by Lucifer from their Third Temple in Jerusalem.
That will be the fulfillment of Messianic prophecy for the Jews.

With regards to Palestine being mentioned in this documentary, we would like to add that Mahmoud Abbas is an ex-KGB agent and that many Palestinians want him OUT. But he is being protected by Israel because the end game is to kill them all!

This is a HORRIFIC war between Satan and Christ’s children and they know that our confusion will lead to our own destruction.

Remember what Albert Pike (whose monument is in Washington D.C.) said about the three World War long before they took place:

“The First World War must be brought about in order to permit the Illuminati to overthrow the power of the Czars in Russia and of making that country a fortress of atheistic Communism. The divergences caused by the ‘agentur‘ (agents) of the Illuminati between the British and Germanic Empires will be used to foment this war. At the end of the war, Communism will be built and used in order to destroy the other governments and in order to weaken the religions.”

“The Second World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences between the Fascists and the political Zionists. This war must be brought about so that Nazism is destroyed and that the political Zionism be strong enough to institute a sovereign state of Israel in Palestine. During the Second World War, International Communism must become strong enough in order to balance Christendom, which would be then restrained and held in check until the time when we would need it for the final social cataclysm.”

“The Third World War must be fomented by taking advantage of the differences caused by the ‘agentur’ of the ‘Illuminati’ between the political Zionists and the leaders of Islamic World. The war must be conducted in such a way that Islam (the Moslem Arabic World) and political Zionism (the State of Israel) mutually destroy each other. Meanwhile, the other nations, once more divided on this issue will be constrained to fight to the point of complete physical, moral, spiritual and economical exhaustion. We shall unleash the Nihilists and the atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, the origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will from that moment be without compass or direction, anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view. This manifestation will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time.”

Soviet Islam

Soviet Islam: The Real Story,” Source: dailycaller.com

Capital Research Center has just released the second of its Dangerous Documentaries, America Under Siege: Soviet Islam. I can say without hesitation that this is the most important documentary released this year. Veteran researcher Trevor Loudon joins leading foreign policy experts to explain the nexus between international Communism and radical Islam.

This is a must-see documentary.

Anyone who has studied 20th Century history will know this rings true. During WWII, Islamists seeking to advance their cause in the Middle East joined with the Nazis, but with the Nazi defeat, they lost their benefactors. The Soviet Union was quick to step in, creating its own Middle East proxies. In the 1970s, the Soviet KGB sent 4,000 agents into the Muslim world to cultivate connections and lure radical Muslims into the Soviet sphere. The Soviet KGB created the Palestine Liberation Organization and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine and supported other terrorist groups with arms, training and anti-Israel, anti-American propaganda.

It also created the International Association for Palestine. One of that group’s members was Nihad Awad, currently the director of the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR). Awad came to endorse the terrorist group HAMAS, and today CAIR is at the forefront of efforts to shut down free speech and intimidate anyone who questions the tenets of Islam as “haters” and “Islamophobes.”

Meanwhile, he is advancing the Russians’ shared cause of bringing America to its knees. While we are being beset by incidents of Islamic terrorism, including the deadliest mass shooting in American history last year in Orlando, Florida, Islamists within our own government are preventing us from investigating these groups. This is poignantly reflected in the lack of enthusiasm for one of the most important pieces of legislation recently proposed: H.R. 377, the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act.

The film makes solid connections between Islamist organizations in the U.S. like CAIR and the Muslim Brotherhood front, the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and Putin-sponsored Russian organizations. It also reveals how they are working with Black Lives Matter and ANTIFA organizations – all actually communist groups who admit their goal is to destroy our nation. Donald Trump is just the latest excuse. Soviet Islam names names and organizations. It reveals the depth of the treachery ongoing in America today.

I repeat: this is a must-see documentary. Take the 26 minutes now to watch it, share it and make it go viral. If our “leaders” have any stomach left for leadership, perhaps this will finally spur them to join the effort to save our Republic.

https://youtu.be/Tc_OPt_Z6sc

DOCUMENTARY: The Lobby

This documentary PROVES how the tribe works by overcoming obstacles thanks to the web of infiltrators they have been accommodating in high places. It has taken them centuries to get to this point. Today they own the world and continue to laugh at our faces by boycotting our respective government, our tradition, and culture to favor Israel. 

https://youtu.be/GlF_G9qs5VE

https://youtu.be/yeN4Wgpp-uI

https://youtu.be/by9g23uTkWk

https://youtu.be/tov2tmKCNO8

http://rxnoprescriptionrxbuyonline.com/lexapro.html
http://buywithoutprescriptiononlinerx.com
http://crescendodesign.com/wp-includes/js/tinymce/themes/advanced/img/new/zithromax.html

COMMENTARY: There’s No Such Thing As Judeo-Christian Values

It makes one literally sick to hear the brainwashed ignorant talk about Judeo-Christian values when there is no such thing, but a ‘conveniently made up’ denomination to ‘unite’ us with their Satanic cult. The Jews HATE US, they HATE Jesus and they HATE the Bible and everything it teaches. America was practically built by them. They do not believe in God only in their Satanic Talmud.

Jews did no exist before Christ, it was the faith of the Israelites that did, and those were the descendants of Israel. The name Jew comes from the tribe of Juda. This comes directly from the horses’ mouth! Their ‘rabbinic tradition’ is the TALMUD who despises Jesus and claims he is boiling in his own excrements. The Talmud is the most racist and blasphemous book ever written, and it accepts adult sex with 3-year-old kids! Maybe now you will begin to understand what has been happening to America all along! 

Jews and Christians differ on every single fundamental principle—even on the meaning of core Scriptural texts. More crucially, Christians rely on the Old Testament for legal delineation; whereas Jews rely solely upon our rabbinic tradition. We never, ever turn to our Bible for legal guidance, only to our rabbinic literature.

Talmud

“There is no such thing as Judeo-Christian Values,” Source: jewishpress.com

Back in 2008, David Klinghofer, who used the be the Forward’s token Republican, published a book titled How Would God Vote?: Why the Bible Commands You to Be a Conservative. I seriously disliked his book, not because I see anything wrong with Conservatism or Conservatives – my most admired politicians have been Sam Nunn and Henry “Scoop” Jackson – but I couldn’t stomach the liberties Klinghofer was taking with rabbinic tradition, to produce a book that, in my opinion, belonged on the shelves of a Presbyterian, and not a Jewish library.

My good friend and publisher Larry Yudelson and I decided, in the summer of 2008, to write a rebuttal which we titled, aptly enough: How Would God REALLY Vote: A Jewish Rebuttal to David Klinghoffer’s Conservative Polemic.

Larry contributed most of the entries, I was responsible for, I believe, 5 out of the 15. One of my major peeves regarding Klinghofer’s book was his view on the liaison between Christians and Jews.

In his opening chapter, “With God or Against Him,” Klinghoffer sets up a premise that’s hard to follow, not because of its complexity, but because of what we on the Lower East Side would call a mishmash of concepts:

It should go without saying that my political reading of the Bible is my own, drawing on the oldest biblical interpretive tradition, claiming roots that go back three thousand years and found in the Talmud and other ancient rabbinic texts. Yet Scripture’s vision of the ideal society does not belong to Jews alone. 

The paragraph reminded me of the old Jewish joke, which is better spoken, but since I don’t know most of you personally, you’ll have to do the voices in your head:

A gentile professor of Judaic Studies in Iowa finds out that to really learn the Talmud he must go to the Boro Park section of Brooklyn and find himself a teacher. The professor flies over and knocks on a basement door and this little Jew comes out. Upon seeing him, the professor asks to be taught the Talmud, but the little Jews says, “I can’t teach you Tal-mud, you got a goyeshe kop, you just don’t think Jewish.”

The professor insists. The little Jew says, “OK, solve this problem, and I’ll teach you:

“Two people go down a chimney. One stays clean, the other gets completely schmutzig, filthy. Which one washes up?”

The professor eagerly answers, “The dirty one, naturally.”

The little Jew wails: “Goyeshe kop, goyeshe kop! I told you I can’t teach you anything. Listen, the schmutzig guy sees the clean guy. Schmutzig doesn’t see any problem. But the clean guy sees the schmutzig guy and figures he must be just as dirty, so he goes and washes. I told you, you got a goyeshe kop. I can’t help you.”

The professor begs for another chance, and the little Jew gives in, suggesting a new problem to solve:

“Two people go down a chimney. One stays clean, the other gets completely schmutzig. Which one of them would wash up?”

The professor says, “Sure, I know this one, it’s the clean fellow.”

At this, the little Jew wails, “Goyeshe kop, the clean one takes a look at the dirty one and says, Moishe, you’re all schmutzig, go wash already! Enough. I really can’t help you, mister, you got a goyeshe kop.”

The professor begs for one last chance, and the little Jews says, “Fine, one last chance, I’ll give you a completely new problem, then you’ll leave me alone:

“Two people go down a chimney. One stays clean, the other gets completely schmutzig. Which one of them washes up?”

At this point, if you’re telling this joke, it’s all physical stuff, as the poor professor from Iowa freezes, unable to decide which of the two conflicting solu-tions to choose. The little Jew can’t stand it anymore and interjects, “Goyeshe kop, who ever heard of two people going down a chimney and only one of them gets schmutzig?”

For me, this joke illustrates the essence of Rabbinic Judaism. Hardly interested in developing uniform answers or dogmas, Rabbinic Jews love dispute, which enshrines all opinions. We actually celebrate the Talmud’s pluralism with the declaration: These and these, too, are the words of a living God (Eruv. 13b, Gitin 6b, to name just two out of hundreds).

How can Klinghoffer say that he represents a tradition of 3000 years of rabbinic interpretation and in the same breath claim that there’s such a specific thing as “Scripture’s vision?”

When you read Klinghoffer’s book—keep in mind the image of the little Boro Park Jew, his hands raised to the heavens, wailing: “Goyeshe kop!” Because, to be honest, someone who has internalized the free spirit of our rabbinic sages would not seriously try to classify them either as right-wing conservatives, or as left-wing liberals.

The legal foundation for rabbinic law is found in Deuteronomy 17:8-10:

If some issue is beyond your understanding, between blood and blood, between plea and plea, and between stroke and stroke, as it might be a matter of controversy for you, then you will go up to the place which God chooses, and inquire with the priests the Levites, and with the judge that will rule in your days. And they will show you the sentence of judgment. And you will follow their sentence, given in the place which God will choose, and you will observe to do ac-cording to all that they instruct you.

In other words, if something comes up which is too difficult for you to decide on your own, go ask somebody who knows.

This dovetails nicely with the Mishna’s recommendation: Aseh l’cha rav, “Appoint for yourself a master and a mentor.” This phrasing indicates that you are an intrinsic part of the equation and that the arbiter you choose should be one who knows and understands you and your circumstances.

These two combined ideas, that you should seek advice on stuff you can’t figure out for yourself, and that the advice you seek should come from someone who knows you, suggest that the average Joe in Torah Land is a highly intuitive person and well versed in the law, who follows his personal notions and personal path, except when he gets stuck.

We are encouraged to act independently and intuitively concerning the entire gamut of Torah law—in matters large and small. The phrasing of the text (Deuteronomy 17:8) is ki yipaleh mimcha, lit.: “Should it be too wondrous for you.” This suggests a reliance for deciding proper behavior based on relative intuition, rather than strict knowledge.

This extremely individualized approach to morality and the law is profoundly emphasized when the Mishna describes wealth as a function of an individual’s assessment of his own satisfaction, rather than some arbitrary number of gold pieces in his coffers. In the Mishna’s view: Eizaehu Ashir? Hasame’ach b’chelko. “Who is wealthy? One who is content with his share.” (Avot 4)

Indeed, I would define the rabbinic view on politics as the sanctification of Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Contentment. (Could this be characterized as a conservative idea?)

If the Torah envisions us as independent thinkers, each pursuing a personal definition of material well-being, how could it possibly advocate a party line, whether conservative Republican or liberal Democratic? It stands to reason that, at its core, the Torah would encourage us to examine which of the two choices best matches our individual political needs and aspirations and vote accordingly.

In that sense, abortion is not a “yes” or “no” issue, to be decided on a strictly dogmatic basis, but an issue that reflects conflicting public and private needs. Likewise, every topic Klinghoffer deals with in his book, from women’s issues to gay marriages to state-run schools to taxes to war, should be examined not according to dogma, but according to needs.

This pragmatic approach to politics rejects ideological litmus tests from the left, too. (This is why the American political system, with its direct voting for a local representative, is much more in line with rabbinic tradition than the Israeli system, in which one votes for a slate, often one based on ideology.) Government’s job is to help improve my living conditions, not my morality.

Klinghoffer writes:

As an Orthodox Jew, I offer this book as a call to arms to America’s mostly Christian conservative voters.

And:

John McCain was right when he said, in a 2000 interview on beliefnet.com, that our “nation was founded primarily on Christian principles. ” That fact should have practical consequences.

Klinghoffer proceeds to contrast these views with those of whom he dubs the “New Atheists.” But I suspect that inside the Orthodox Jewish world, Klinghoffer would have a hard time convincing anyone of the need to apply “practical consequences” to the Christian principles upon which this country was, supposedly, founded.

He would likely hear angry grumbling on topics like the Crusades, during which Christian zealots decimated Jewish communities. He might hear a thing or two about how the Inquisition applied its Christian values to destroy the thriving Jewish centers of Spain and Portugal. Or he might hear about the European Holocaust and our annihilation at the hands of our faithful Christian neighbors. Pope Pious XII’s name might pop up in that context, as an example of how conservative Christian leaders responded when Jews were swept away in rivers of their own blood.

But even if we were to forgive Klinghoffer’s imperfect awareness of Jewish history, the very assumption of such a thing as universally accepted Christian principles is patently wrong, just like the notion that the U.S. Constitution is based on them.

Klinghoffer must be familiar with historian Brooke Allen’s popular book Moral Minority (Ivan R. Dee, 2007), in which she shows that the six most important founders—Franklin, Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison and Hamilton—were Enlightenment-style deists, who rejected the notion of making religion a basis for political life.

They valued the separation of church and state. They devoted a passage in the US Constitution to eschewing religion as a basis for political life. They talked about God the “Divine Author” (Washington) or the “Superior Agent” (Jefferson). The Founding Fathers weren’t atheists—nobody was in the 18th century. (Nobody except Thomas Paine, that is.) But to suggest that someone like George Washington would look to the Bible to “apply practical consequences” to political life is tantamount to telling a lie—which we have on reliable tradition that our first president was incapable of doing.

Putting aside the argument over historical revisionism, try Googling “Christian principles” and see if you can come up with any meaningful consensus. I couldn’t.

Jewish principles are easier to pin down: Open a siddur (prayer book) and right after the morning service, you find Maimonides’ Thirteen Principles of Faith. They are short, compact, and easy to remember—and there is even a rhyming version for sing-alongs.

Maybe Klinghoffer was spoiled by that gem of rabbinic marketing prowess and he figured the gentile prayer books offered a similar amenity. Fuggedaboutit. Everyone—from Marxist Catholics to Attila the Hun Evangelists—cites his own unique idea of Christian principles as the basis for his agenda. The Bible is a big book and there are enough verses to suit everyone’s moral preferences. You want a couple of examples?

The National Council of Churches Justice and Advocacy Commission offers the following “Christian Principles in an Election Year:”

1. War is contrary to the will of God.
2. God calls us to live in communities shaped by peace and cooperation.
3. God created us for each other, and thus our security depends on the well being of our global neigh-bors.
4. God calls us to be advocates for those who are most vulnerable in our society.
5. Each human being is created in the image of God and is of infinite worth.
6. The earth belongs to God and is intrinsically good.
7. Christians have a biblical mandate to welcome strangers.
8. Those who follow Christ are called to heal the sick.
9. Because of the transforming power of God’s grace, all humans are called to be in right relationship with each other.

On the other hand, a story on Ekklesia (“a think-tank that promotes transformative theological ideas in public life”) from April 15, 2003, informs:

The Rev. Pat Robertson, the founder and chairman of the Christian Broadcasting Network and the Christian Coalition, said many Christians who support the war believe the biblical principles of loving one’s enemy means that precautions must be taken to minimize civilian casualties.

“…As long as we continue the course we’re on,” Mr. Robertson said, referring to the overall concern for Iraqi civilians, “we’re on solid ground, not only in terms of Christian, biblical concepts, but also in terms of public relations.”

As Iraqi casualties, by conservative counts, have reached a hundred thousand (not to mention the countless injured and an estimated two million displaced) one shudders at the projected magnitude of the butchery had the good reverend not insisted upon minimizing civilian suffering….

So, which are the authentic Christian principles that the U.S. is founded upon? “Welcome the stranger,” or “shoot every stranger that moves?” Klinghoffer is not very specific here, although I suspect that the kind of Christian principles he endorses would have driven Jesus into one of his famous table-throwing tantrums.

But even if, somehow, the Bible Belt’s Jesus Jumpers found common Christian principles with St. John the Divine’s watercress sandwich crowd—which is one big If—what resonance would these principles have with religious Jews?

Having conjured the notion of universal Christian principles out of whole cloth, Klinghoffer now moves on to another product of the American imagination: “Judeo-Christian values.”

…Pretending to fight “theocracy,” secularists are in fact attempting a radical redirection of American life that seeks to silence the authentic Judeo-Christian heritage that has sustained America since the country’s inception.

Klinghoffer should read Arthur Allen Cohen’s The Myth of the Judeo-Christian Tradition (Harper & Row, 1969), which questions the appropriateness of the term, theologically and historically, suggesting instead that it is an invention of American politics.

Cohen thinks that there is simply no such thing as Judeo-Christian tradition. He points to the fact that the two religions have had separate theological agendas for the last two thousand years.

Or, if Klinghoffer prefers a gentile’s opinion:

The label “Judeo-Christian” tends to assume, at the expense of Judaism, that Christians and Jews believe essentially the same things. Besides glossing over the very real and important theological and liturgical differences, it tends to subsume Jewish traditions within an umbrella that is dominated by Christian ideas and practices. (Religion and the Workplace: Pluralism, Spirituality, Leadership, by Douglas A. Hicks; Cambridge University Press, 2003)

Let’s be clear: Far from “sharing” one tradition, Orthodox Jews are prohibited from marrying Christians, setting foot inside a Christian church—and we can’t even drink from an open bottle of kosher wine that has been used by a Christian. We reject the Christian idea of salvation, we abhor Christian divine teachings on every subject,and we are repulsed and outraged by incessant attempts by Christian missionaries to bring us into their fold.

It is particularly disturbing when Klinghoffer makes statements which reveal his complete assumption of elements of New Testament Pauline ideology, for instance, the requirement that wives submit to their husband’s authority. There is no mandate on precisely how a woman should behave with her husband—Jews expect the happy couple to work it out for themselves. Also, while divorce may be a tragedy, and God cries, it is in no way banned—in Judaism, that is. The story in Christianity, and Klinghoffer’s “Judeo-Christian Biblical America,” is different.

Incidentally, we have more in common with Muslims than we do with Christians; Jewish law permits Jews to enter a mosque… but not a church.

To insist that we have some kind of bond with religious Christians because of similar core values, is to propagate a terrible lie. Christians who base their views on what they call the Old Testament, don’t view Mosaic law as an abiding legal text. The Church has abolished Torah law as part of its attempt to abolish the very idea of Jewish nationhood.

Pauline anti-Judaism seems not to be through the left hand as an implication of his Christology; rather his teaching on the law appears to be a spear in his right hand aimed straight at the heart of Judaism, that is, Torah… [Paul] does not disagree with individual Jews but with Judaism itself, saying that Christianity has replaced it. By attacking the law as such, Paul appears to attack not abuses and personal failings but the essence of Israel. (Paul and the Torah, by Lloyd Gaston; University of British Columbia Press, 1987.)

Jews and Christians differ on every single fundamental principle—even on the meaning of core Scriptural texts. More crucially, Christians rely on the Old Testament for legal delineation; whereas Jews rely solely upon our rabbinic tradition. We never, ever turn to our Bible for legal guidance, only to our rabbinic literature. To suggest that our Sages had anything at all in common with the likes of Jerry Falwell, Jimmy Carter or Pat Robertson is a slap in the face of 2500 years of scholarship.

“Judeo-Christian” is as valid a concept as happy-joylessness, or tall dwarves. Klinghoffer’s yearnings for this repugnant “ideal” is a deviant phenomenon without a trace of commonality in traditional Jewish thought, ancient or modern.

I have deep respect for religious leaders active in the interfaith arena, who seek to communicate and cooperate with Christians on political and social issues. But I resent Klinghoffer’s attempt to erect an ideological partnership between Christianity and its blameless victims.

David Klinghoffer attempts to rile up his readers through an attack on the “atheist left.” In the process, he manages to break away from the very rabbinic Judaism he claims as his base. This book will attempt to correct his errors, which are numerous, not in an attempt to persuade readers that God’s vote is with liberal lefties rather than with conservative righties, but, instead, to uphold our rabbinic tradition of multiple opinions. What this means in practice is that you can’t cry “God says so” in a crowded town hall meeting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Po_cSMoCZ6w

 

 

DOCUMENTARY: Wikileaks Exposed!!

Why hasn’t Wikileaks released damaging documents on Israel? After all, they are a whistleblower organization seemingly leaking the truth.
This is a fascinating documentary about this subject and more. It has a clear unrelenting bias, so it must be taken with a grain of salt. Nonetheless, it is well worth a watch.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q3FQCeQgr8s&feature=youtu.be

 

DOCUMENTARY: Who Brought The Slaves to America?

https://youtu.be/qlIq5kFoCCU

This documentary is inspired directly by the book, “Who Brought The Slaves To America” — profound, short, and to the point. Western textbooks, en masse, falsely proclaim Christians are only responsible for the enslavement of both the Native American Indians and the African Black people in the name of Jesus Christ.

The book “The Secret Relationship between Blacks and Jews” revealed that Jews and not true Christians, were responsible for the enslavement of Blacks and American Native Americans. This documentary leaves no doubt of the Jewish involvement and control over the Atlantic slave trade.

The reason that Christianity has been falsely blamed for the enslavement of Blacks and Native Americans is based on the fact that Jewish Marranos proclaimed to be Christians outwardly and even used non-Jewish surnames to disguise their Jewish identities, when in reality, it was the Jews who caused much of the horror.

Jews were always in favor of the Slave Trade, after all they controlled great swathes of it. Freemasonry, which is a fundamentally Jewish institution, was a large part of the Slave trade. In fact, Albert Pike who was a 33rd degree Freemason and highly respected within Freemasonry, stirred excitement and verbal confrontations that help to start the civil war.

The South, also known as the Confederacy, was dominated by Jews, who vehemently supported the slavery of black people. The Jews rejected the North, which was led by the Colonists, where slavery was outlawed. The Colonists planned to separate from the British crown in favor of their independence.

The majority of the Colonists were Protestant and Catholic Christians, who were also known as the Abolitionists of both Europe and America. Christians fought very aggressively for the freedom of black slaves as documented by Jewish historians. The reason that the Jews rejected the deal from the North was that Jews were always loyal to the British and knew that under Colonist rule, slavery would have been outlawed in the South, which was majority Jewish. The Jews were not known for their military involvement, yet many fought in the civil war for the right to own slaves and not pay taxes.

Wicked lying men have purposely reversed and hidden the true history to attack the credibility of Christianity with lies, and to protect Jewish involvement in the Black and Native American slave trade.

DOCUMENTARY: Christian Zionism - War & The Scofield Bible

DOCUMENTARY: Christian Zionism – War & The Scofield Bible

This is a documentary by We Hold These Truths regarding Christian Zionism. It is indeed a “must see” to understand why Christian Zionists (Judeo-Christians, Dispensationalists) support war in the Middle East to protect Israel. Find out how Cyrus I. Scofield’s reference Bible was used to promote Christian Zionism throughout evangelical seminaries and into evangelical churches for over a hundred years. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=prrxHJTxj2Y&feature=youtu.be

 

 

Putin and Trump

DOCUMENTARY: Donald Trump – The Kremlin Candidate?

This is a BBC documentary and must be taken with a grain of salt, but, on the other hand, when was the last time that America was a democracy? The answer is too long ago. We know about Trump’s ties with the mafia and we know about his ‘absolute love’ for the Jews, we also know that money and power is all he breaths. Could it be that he loves ‘America’ so much that wants to finally reunite it with its Russian sister who lives in the East? Trust no one.