Jimmy Carter

VIDEO: Carter’s Words On Palestine!

If Obama recognized Palestine before he leaves office it would represent a great achievement. Trump will make things much worse. He is very weak when it comes to his daughter who is obviously not too bright and extremely ignorant. Having married a Zionist proves her lack of knowledge of responsibility towards the entire world being who she is and knowing that her father would at some point run for President. She married a traitor so she is a traitor and is making a traitor of her father as well. Truly revolting family. This is what happens when people are so so ignorant and have money. Money does not by knowledge or common sense.


“Carter’s words on Palestine!,” Source: presstv.ir
Lame duck US President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party have “nothing to lose” if recognition is extended to Palestine in the final days of the administration, a move that could have significant impact on the future of the Muslim nation, investigative journalist Wayne Madsen suggests.

The Tampa-based author and columnist, who specializes in intelligence and international affairs, made the remarks in an interview with Press TV on Tuesday, while commenting about an op-ed by former President Jimmy Carter on why the US must recognize Palestine soon before President-elect Donald Trump takes control of the White House.

“I am convinced that the United States can still shape the future of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict before a change in presidents, but time is very short,” wrote the 92-year-old former president in the article published by the New York Times on Monday.

“The simple but vital step this administration must take before its term expires on January 20 is to grant American diplomatic recognition to the state of Palestine, as 137 countries have already done, and help it achieve full United Nations membership.”

The Obama administration has been engaged in efforts for a so-called two-state solution during his tenure but to no avail as the Israeli regime has remained intransigent in its expansive policies as well as the harsh crackdown on the Palestinian population.

US recognition of a Palestinian state could bring about achievements for the nation although the future president “can always reverse” such a move, Madsen suggested.

“President Carter is absolutely correct,” said the political commentator, adding that Trump’s mass reversal of the previous administration’s policies, like the one towards Cuba, comes at a “political cost.”

Dems will have to ‘bury the action’

While campaigning for the 2016 presidential election, Trump took a different approach towards the situation in Palestine than Obama, saying he would recognize East Jerusalem al-Quds as the “undivided capital of the state of Israel,” and vowing to move the US embassy in Israel to the city, which Palestinians want as their capital.

Apart from being considered a blow to the so-called two-state solution, the comments reflected Trump’s close ties with the ruling party in Israel, Likud, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at its helm.

“He has very close relations with Netanyahu. His son-in law, Jared Kushner, comes from an orthodox Jewish family in New York that has very close links with the Likud party of Israel,” Madsen said, further referring to other pro-Israel figures in the Trump administration, set to gain power on January 20, 2017.

Considering the appointments Trump is making and the fact that he has “surrounded” himself by his family members, including Kushner, “Carter is essentially right,” he noted.

“There is a short window now for President Obama to extend recognition of Palestine and Obama has nothing to lose,” he said. “Democrats won’t have another election for four years[2020], so there won’t be a major political price to pay amongst the Israel lobby if Obama goes ahead and recognize Palestine.”

He argued that during his first term as president, Obama was “obviously concerned about the power of the Israel lobby” over his reelection in 2012.

“It makes sense that if he is going to do it, he would do it as a lame duck president… and the Democrats have two years to basically bury the action.”

Still, Carter has a point

The United States recognition of Palestine would mean Washington will “drop its veto” on the Muslim nation’s membership at the United Nations and that may be what the 39th American commander-in-chief “may be getting at.”

“If the US does not veto Palestine’s membership in the Security Council, there is nothing President Trump can do to change what the UN has done; He could de-recognize Palestine by the United States but this may be a way to get Palestine as a permanent [member] in the UN and I think that’s maybe what President Carter has in mind,“ said the author of the blog Wayne Madsen Report.

Jimmy Carter

Carter (pictured above) has come under harsh criticism in Israel over his views on the situation in Palestine, expressed in part in his 2006 book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid.

Israel was made in 1948, when it occupied the Palestinian land along with expanses of other Arab territories during full-fledged military operations.

In 1967, the Zionist regime occupied the Palestinian territories of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem al-Quds and the Gaza Strip. It withdrew from Gaza in 2005, but has been keeping it under recurrent strikes as well as a crippling siege.

Palestine enjoys non-member observer state status in the United Nations and is recognized by 137 UN members.

Jill Stein Raises $4.5 Million for Vote Recount in Swing States

Put simply, there are only three reasonable explanations as to why this is taking place:

1.) The money itself. If she raises $7 million and doesn’t spend all of it trying to get a ‘recount,’ she is obviously left with lots of change.

2.) A deal was made between her and Clinton, either before, during, or after the election to raise doubts about the veracity of the vote count as a means of lending credibility/legitimacy to Clinton’s contesting of the results.


3.) A combination of both.


“Jill Stein raises $4.5mn for vote recount in swing states,” Source: rt.com

After meeting her goal of raising $4.5 million in just over 24 hours to cover vote recount costs in the swing states of Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, Dr. Jill Stein has once again upped her fundraising game, now asking for a total of $7 million.

The first goal was funding for Wisconsin, completed just in time to meet the recount filing deadline of November 25. In Pennsylvania the deadline for filing for a recount is Monday, while Michigan has a Wednesday deadline.

Stein, who won about 1.2 million votes in the presidential election, launched an online fundraising campaign Wednesday in an effort to “ensure the integrity of our elections” and “demand recounts in these three states where the data suggest a significant need to verify machine-counted vote totals.”

Stein says the $4.5 million in funds is required by state law to cover “filing fees alone” and claims the total cost including attorney fees is likely to reach $6-7 million.

Together, the three states carry a total of 46 electoral votes, and Trump would have to lose all three in the recount for them to impact the presidential result. Stein’s fundraising success has prompted mixed responses on social media, with some people suggesting the move undemocratic in refusing to accept the results as they stand, or is too late to be effective.



Ross Perot

VIDEO: Ross Perot Was Right

What lobby was Ross Perot referring to? The Jewish Lobby? Yes, most probably, its the only lobby that has all the power in this country. Why does the Jewish Lobby want to destroy America? Ever thought about that? Maybe to impose their own ideology which is based on tyranny.  Open your eyes America and stop being so gullible! 

VIDEO: Owned By Israel – American Politicians

American politicians are owned by Israel, and AIPAC is its lobby in the United States. AIPAC wields tremendous influence in Washington DC. No politician can have a successful career in politics without literally pledging their allegiance to it.


Ashamed America

COMMENTARY: No, Trump Should Not Accept The Results Of A Possibly Stolen Election

If America is going to let a THIEF run their country then there is nothing more to say. The United States has gotten to a point where if it doesn’t act NOW to protect its own country, it will not be able to do anything once Clinton is in power. Accepting corruption is the first step to accepting the countries total destruction. It’s up to America to decide. 

Ashamed America

“No, Trump Should Not Accept the Results of a Possibly Stolen Election,” Source: thenewamerican.com

Crooks on the left, cowards on the right. Where do we go to find integrity?

One of the most talked about parts of Wednesday night’s final presidential debate was Donald Trump’s statement that he’d let us know on election night if he’d accept the balloting results. An NBC commentator expressed her bubble-headed opinion that the statement lost him the election. Worse still, “conservative” commentator John Podhoretz wrote that Trump’s comment was “a shocking and cravenly irresponsible thing to say, the sort of thing that threatens to rend our national fabric, and for that alone, Trump has earned his place in the history of American ignominy.” But Podhoretz’ criticism is what’s shocking and cravenly irresponsible — and reflective of profound ignorance.

Are some of us living in an alternate-reality universe? We just saw NYC’s Democrat election commissioner, Alan Schulkin, caught on video admitting that “there’s a lot of vote fraud,” as he talked about how people are “bussed” around to vote illegally. This was followed by a Project Veritas sting video showing a Democrat operative slug named Scott Foval giving advice on how to commit the fraud, saying that it has been going on for 50 years and that it “doesn’t matter what the friggin’ legal and ethics people say, we need to win this m****rf****r.” There was also the WikiLeaks released email showing that Clinton allies, also Democrats, presumably, believe that Obama forces committed vote fraud in 2008. Then there’s another WikiLeaks email in which Clinton campaign manager John Podesta wrote that “if you show up on Election Day with a drivers [sic] license with a picture [and 12 states and D.C. allow illegals  to get licenses], attest that you are a citizen, you have a right to vote in Federal elections.” Add to this the 2012 Pew study showing that approximately “24 million — one of every eight — voter registrations in the United States are no longer valid or are significantly inaccurate. More than 1.8 million deceased individuals are listed as voters. [And] [a]pproximately 2.75 million people have registrations in more than one state,” and what does it add up to?

That the John Podhoretzes of the world are, through their cowardice and sins of omission, hurting our republic.

Reality No. 1: There is vote fraud.

Reality No. 2: Since there’s vote fraud, it’s possible an election — especially a close one — could be stolen.

Yet the three-little-monkey coward-cons think that, somehow, it’s noble and healthy to view a possibly stolen election and say “Nothing to see here; move along.” Maybe if we pretend hard enough, everything will be okay.

I have no idea how Trump’s statement will play out, given that he didn’t explain the matter well and we have coward-cons doing the jobs (real) Americans wouldn’t do, but I suspect the average person doesn’t share Podhoretz’ concern over violation of a twisted view of propriety. But here’s the answer I would have given debate moderator Chris Wallace when he stated, to Trump, that we have a “tradition” in this country of a peaceful transfer of power:

Yes, sir, and we have another American tradition: it’s called the “rule of law.” And when you suspect an election has been stolen, and allow it to go unanswered, you become complicit in the undermining of our rule of law. Moreover, vote fraud that swings an election thwarts the people’s will. You may not care about that. Hillary Clinton certainly doesn’t care about that. But if I have reasonable suspicion that the Nov. 8 contest has been stolen, I will stand against the thwarting of the rule of law and the people’s will — even if I’m the only person in America to do it.

In addition, what is Wallace talking about? Trump isn’t proposing that tanks roll into Washington, D.C., and forcibly extract usurpers of power. He’s talking about what has happened before — most recently when Democrat Al Gore contested the 2000 election — and what Hillary Clinton wouldn’t hesitate to do if she thought it would benefit her. And did the punditry say that Gore rent America’s fabric and earned his place in the history of American ignominy?

I cannot tell you how disgusting I find the coward-cons’ cravenness. It is, sadly, a common failing of man to prefer to rationalize, or stick one’s head in the sand, than to face up to tough challenges and hard truths. This is the mentality causing coward-cons to tell Sheriff Joe Arpaio not to look into Obama’s birth certificate, and and to tell judges to refuse to hand down anti-establishment rulings for fear of opening “that can of worms.” But tolerating criminality gets you more criminality. This is, mind you, a hallmark of Third World nations. Corruption is rife, tolerated, and many pretend it isn’t going on. You want to descend fully into Third Worldism? Listen to the coward-cons.

What the coward-cons miss, in their infinite lack of wisdom, is that unanswered corruption means our national fabric is already being rent.  And their prescription is to allow corruption to fester, to grow, to become status quo? It’s as with cancer: attacking it early involves some pain, perhaps enduring nauseating treatments or an operation to excise a malignant tumor. But ignoring it, refusing to face reality, means a metastasis that will consume the whole body and lead, ultimately, to death. Tolerate a bit of visible rending now — or risk having nothing left to rend later.

The coward-cons are the people who get elected to office — and then get nothing done. They’re the weak sisters who never saw a culture-war battle they couldn’t lose. If you suspect your vote has been negated by electoral fraud, would you want those charged with ensuring the system’s integrity to look the other way? Or would you want the matter sifted to the very bottom?

If the coward-cons would choose the former, then they’ve earned their place in the history of American ignominy.



Soros Pulls The Strings

Soros Associate Runs Vote Count in Key Battleground States

Conflict of interests anyone? Well, we won’t be hearing any such talk from the mainstream media on this matter. Nothing to see here people — move along.

Soros Pulls The Strings
Soros Pulls The Strings

“Soros Associate Runs Vote Count in Key Battleground States,” Source: freespeechtwentyfirstcentury.com

George Soros sidekick Mark Malloch­‐Brown is the chairman of Smartmatic, an electronic voting machine conglomerate that provides technology and support services to the electoral commissions of 307 counties in 16 U.S. states. Smartmatic holds the largest election automation contract in U.S. history – Cook County, Illinois. The company website states that it has configured 392,000 electoral devices across America and “deployed”  57,000 vote-counting machines. This company launched TIVI, which it calls, “a secure, verifiable online voting solution for governmental elections.”

British Lord Mark Malloch­‐Brown has a long globalist resume. He is vice‐chairman of Soros’ investment funds and Open Society Foundations philanthropy. He was formerly vice president of World Bank and lead international partner in a political consulting firm. He has served as vice-chairman of the World Economic Forum and as deputy secretary general and chief of staff of the U.N. under Kofi Annan. He also authored a book called “The Unfinished Global Revolution.”

Nothing to see here, ignore the one-world government man behind the curtain! Yes, faux democracy in full bloom. They really think you are that stupid.

In 2005, Smartmatic acquired Sequoia Voting Systems, a California-based Company that had been automating U.S. elections for over a century. The list of Smartmatic’s clients is jaw dropping as it includes a big majority of toss-up states in the U.S. presidential election. It also explains the election anomalies witnessed in the Clinton-Sanders California primary.

If necessary in a close election with small margins in key battleground states, votes can be stolen using a small-scale algorithm, thereby affecting as few votes as possible. Close-outcome states with Smartmatic technology are in bold below.


District of Columbia
New Jersey

In the following video, Donald Trump comments on rigged voting. The nasty (((MSM))) dismiss this as “damaging rhetoric.”

This company is already accused of voter fraud in Mexico, the Philippines and Brazil, where a Marxist president with a 15% approval rating managed to get re-elected with key voting areas only counting only 75% of the votes.

BOMBSHELL!!!: Rigging The Election

In these explosive videos from the brave people of Project Veritas Action, we see the diabolical tricks played by the ‘Communist’ Democratic party, where they clearly follow the Communist motto – ‘the end justify the means.’ The videos document violence at Trump rallies traced to the Clinton campaign and the DNC through a process called bird-dogging. It clearly proves a shady coordinated communications chain between the DNC, Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton’s Super PAC (Priorities) and other organizations.

Is this what American’s want? If these people are doing this now, imagine what they will do if they win. They are following the script used by dictators in Communist countries. Please share with as many people as you can; fight for our freedoms. 

Part 1.- 

Part 2.- 

Time Bomb


This film was produced in 1965 at the height of the Civil Rights movement in America. But, instead of being out of date, it provides lessons and insights as to how the enemies of freedom manipulate people into acts of self-destruction. This is happening in America today and people have not yet realized that they keep falling into the trap. What is Black Lives Matter if not a tool to divide us? What was the Bolshevique Revolution all about if not a tool to incite hatred? The number one enemy of freedom is Communism. Communism is Talmudic Judaism.

Talmudic Jews are after the destruction of all religions because they want to be ‘the religion’ of the world, they want to control and have the Goyim under their evil command. We have to open our eyes to this.

Hillary Clinton

WIKILEAKS: Confirms Hillary Sold Weapons To ISIS… Then Drops Another BOMBSHELL!

Hillary Clinton has been a Communist all her life and Communism has been her goal for America. The corruption that we see is proof that we do not live in a democracy, the Clinton’s like many others, have immunity and get away with murder.  The United States is mentioned over and over on these emails, how come Israel is not, when we know that they are also funding ISIS? 

Hillary Clinton

“WikiLeaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS… Then Drops Another BOMBSHELL! Breaking News,” Source: thepoliticalinsider.com

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is a controversial character. But there’s no denying the emails he has picked up from inside the Democrat Party are real, and he’s willing to expose Hillary Clinton.

Now, he’s announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department were actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.

Clinton has repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate.

WikiLeaks is about to prove Hillary Clinton deserves to be arrested:

The Reagan administration officials hoped to secure the release of several U.S. hostages, and then take proceeds from the arms sales to Iran, to fund the Contras in Nicaragua.

Sounds familiar?

In Obama’s second term, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton authorized the shipment of American-made arms to Qatar, a country beholden to the Muslim Brotherhood, and friendly to the Libyan rebels, in an effort to topple the Libyan/Gaddafi government, and then ship those arms to Syria in order to fund Al Qaeda, and topple Assad in Syria.

Clinton took the lead role in organizing the so-called “Friends of Syria” (aka Al Qaeda/ISIS) to back the CIA-led insurgency for regime change in Syria.

Under oath Hillary Clinton denied she knew about the weapons shipments during public testimony in early 2013 after the Benghazi terrorist attack.

In an interview with Democracy Now, Wikileaks’ Julian Assange is now stating that 1,700 emails contained in the Clinton cache directly connect Hillary to Libya to Syria, and directly to Al Qaeda and ISIS.

Via The Duran

Here is the incredible transcript:

JUAN GONZÁLEZ: Julian, I want to mention something else. In March, you launched a searchable archive for over 30,000 emails and email attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was secretary of state. The 50,547 pages of documents span the time from June 2010 to August 2014; 7,500 of the documents were sent by Hillary Clinton herself. The emails were made available in the form of thousands of PDFs by the U.S. State Department as the result of a Freedom of Information Act request. Why did you do this, and what’s the importance, from your perspective, of being able to create a searchable base?

JULIAN ASSANGE: Well, WikiLeaks has become the rebel library of Alexandria. It is the single most significant collection of information that doesn’t exist elsewhere, in a searchable, accessible, citable form, about how modern institutions actually behave. And it’s gone on to set people free from prison, where documents have been used in their court cases; hold the CIA accountable for renditions programs; feed into election cycles, which have resulted in the termination of, in some case—or contributed to the termination of governments, in some cases, taken the heads of intelligence agencies, ministers of defense and so on. So, you know, our civilizations can only be as good as our knowledge of what our civilisation is. We can’t possibly hope to reform that which we do not understand.

So, those Hillary Clinton emails, they connect together with the cables that we have published of Hillary Clinton, creating a rich picture of how Hillary Clinton performs in office, but, more broadly, how the U.S. Department of State operates. So, for example, the disastrous, absolutely disastrous intervention in Libya, the destruction of the Gaddafi government, which led to the occupation of ISIS of large segments of that country, weapons flows going over to Syria, being pushed by Hillary Clinton, into jihadists within Syria, including ISIS, that’s there in those emails. There’s more than 1,700 emails in Hillary Clinton’s collection, that we have released, just about Libya alone.

It appears that Hillary Clinton committed perjury, just like her husband was caught doing as President.

Clinton at AIPAC

COMMENTARY: Bill & Hillary Clinton Both Opposed His Invitation from AIPAC in 2010

At the end of the day, the Clintons are puppets and are beholden to AIPAC and other elements of the Israel Lobby. Why? It all comes down to money and power. They need them to advance their political aspirations — it is that simple. Are they real pro-Zionists? Their actions certainly indicate it, but e-mails like these make one wonder.

Clinton at AIPAC
Hillary Clinton at AIPAC

“Bill & Hillary Clinton Both Opposed His Invitation from AIPAC in 2010,” Source: mondoweiss.net

We all know what American politicians say publicly about Israel and its lobby; it’s a giant love affair. But behind closed doors, the temperature goes down, and the politicians are annoyed by the lobby. That’s the news in emails released by a neoconservative website showing that both Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton were against Bill Clinton accepting an invitation from the Israel lobby group AIPAC in 2009.

Hillary Clinton was then secretary of state and both sides were obviously playing politics. The lobby group was “begging” for the former president to speak, while the secretary of state’s chief of staff said, “we need to touch this base.” I.e., we need to keep the lobby happy.

The emails have gotten attention today because Hillary Clinton aide Huma Abedin describes AIPAC perjoratively as “that crowd.” (Some right wing Jews are all het-up about that.) Here’s the exchange, on Sept. 10, 2009:

[Bill Clinton aide Doug] Band: Aipac begging for wjc to come speak at conference. He doesnt think he should unless you all do.

Abedin: U really want to consider sending him into that crowd?

[State Department counselor and chief of staff] Cheryl Mills: Lets ask Hrc b/c we need to touch this base.

Abedin: She will say the same thing.

Band: Which is Go or not go.

Abedin: No go to aipac.

Bill Clinton did not attend the 2010 conference, per reports. Hillary Clinton did speak at the conference, and gushed over her many friends in the AIPAC leadership, many of them by name, and gushed over Israel too in that speech. And she lamented “daylight between Israel and the United States” over those unhelpful settlements in the West Bank and said the U.S. was moving forward to forge a peace deal to insure Israel’s endurance as a “democratic, Jewish state.”

What hypocrisy, huh? But Democrats are just too dependent on pro-Israel money to walk away from such events.

[embeddoc url=”http://zionistreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/326559030-AIPAC2009emails.pdf” download=”all” viewer=”google”]