INTERVIEW: Putin’s Reign Of Terror

This is ONE OF THE BEST interviews we have ever posted when it comes to explaining who Putin is and what the end goal is all about. It is a shame that there are still people out there who allow Communist brainwashing propaganda to take over their power of reasoning. This happens because they have no historical knowledge of how Communism really works, otherwise, they would not be that easily brainwashed into believing so many lies.

We have not yet read Bjerknes book ‘Putin’s Reign of Terror’ but judging from the interview, it sure sounds like a must-read. Anatoliy Golitsyn warned the world about what was coming in his book ‘New Lies for Old’. WHY DON’T WE SPEND OUR TIME READING HIM AND OTHERS instead of following the media that WE ALL KNOW IS CONTROLLED on both sides? We MUST listen to what history and those who know the regime tell us! 




Buy ventolin inhaler

Khazar Empire

COMMENTARY: Israel’s Secret Plan For A «Second Israel» In Ukraine

It appears that “Novorossiya” (New Russia) in eastern Ukraine is meant to be the ‘New Khazaria’. A few years ago, Putin called European Jews to come to Russia because of rising antisemitism. In reality, it’s not anti-Semitism, but anti-communism, Ukraine does not want to belong to the Soviet Union and its Communist ideology and that is what Putin’s Russia is today. The “New Khazaria” project also called “Novorossiya” has begun with the annexation of Crimea by Russia. The ‘Rebels’ (Russian’s regular army) are holding only two regions in eastern Ukraine. They tried for more but failed. These people need support because they know what Communism is and are trying to fight it, same with Russians, many Russians want Putin and his Communist Jew ilk OUT OF RUSSIA. Please spread the word, there is too much ignorance out there that is helping these criminals expand their territories and gain more strength. 

Khazar Empire
“Israel’s Secret Plan for a «Second Israel» in Ukraine,” Source: strategic-culture.org

The Times of Israel, an independent Israeli newspaper that counts among its staff a number of former reporters for the Israeli daily Ha’aretz, published a fascinating but largely overlooked story datelined Jerusalem and Zhitomir, Ukraine, March 16, 2014, and which was written by its respective Russian and Ukrainian correspondents, Hirsh Ostropoler and I. Z. Grosser-Spass, citing a secret report provided to the Israeli government. The report, written by a select panel of scholars of Jewish history drawn from academia and other research centers, concluded that that European Jews are in fact descended from Khazars, a war-like Mongol-Tatar group that ruled over Ukraine and southern Russia, which mass converted to Judaism in the eighth century AD.


Zionists have long argued that the land claimed by Israel was the biblical birthright of the Jewish people who were forced from the land in a so-called «diaspora» after repeated conquests by various empires. Proof that Ashkenazi Jews, which make up a majority of the Israeli Jewish population, have no historical link to Palestine would call into question the entire premise of Israel as the historical «5,000-year old» homeland of the Jewish people.The Israeli journalists noted that any conversation of the Khazars and modern Israel has always been met with disdain by Israeli leaders. They quote Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir as once saying, «Khazar, Schmazar. There are no Khazar people. I knew no Khazars. In Kiev. Or Milwaukee. Show me these Khazars of whom you speak». DNA proof that a migratory Khazar population from Europe is now claiming ancient roots in Palestine largely eliminates Zionist claims to the region.

The evidence that eastern and central European Jews have no historical claim to Palestine has resulted in a flurry of activity in Israel and abroad. The Israeli Knesset will soon vote on a bill passed by the Israeli Cabinet that legalizes Israel as a Jewish «national state». Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, who read the secret report on the Khazars, has declared that «Israel is the Jewish, nationalist state for the Jewish people». With the Ashkenazi claims to Israel tenuous, at best, Netanyahu, his Likud Party, and his Jewish Orthodox and West Bank settler party allies have no other choice but to aggressively stake their nationalist claims to not only Israel but also to the West Bank – which the nationalists refer to as «Judea and Samaria».

However, some Israelis and Jews abroad are not taking any chances. One of the main reasons why Ukrainian Jewish billionaire tycoon Ihor Kolomoisky, the governor of Ukraine’s Dnipropetrovsk province and citizen of Ukraine, Israel, and Cyprus, is spending tens of millions of dollars on the recruitment of right-wing Ukrainian nationalists and neo-Nazis from other parts of Europe to fight against the Russian-speaking majority in the Donbass region of eastern Ukraine, is a fear that plans to turn Ukraine into a «second Israel» will be derailed. Russia’s protective measures for the Donbass, as well as its incorporation by referendum of Crimea, the latter prized by the resurgent Khazarian Jewish nationalists, threaten the transformation of Ukraine into a second homeland for Ashkenazi Jews who are finding their hold on Israel prime tenuous, at best.

The Times of Israel’s explosive story about the Khazarian roots of the Ashkenazis also revealed that Israel, knowing that a Palestinian state is inevitable considering the increasing pressure for it from Europe, is preparing to resettle Ashkenazi settlers in the West Bank to Ukraine. Israel’s advanced research in genetics resulted in a direct DNA line being established between Israel’sAshkenazi and the Khazars who were dispersed across eastern and central Europe after Russia conquered the Khazarian Empire in the 11th century.

Israelis and their Zionist allies around the world have always accused proponents of the Khazarian-Ashkenazi genetic connection of deep-rooted anti-Semitism. However, the genetic research contained in the secret Israeli report confirms what Israeli historian Shlomo Sand revealed in his book, «The Invention of the Jewish People». The concept of the Khazarian bloodline was first broached by Hungarian historian Arthur Koestler in his 1976 «The Thirteenth Tribe».

The Times of Israel reporters quoted an unnamed aide to Netanyahu who revealed the plans for Israeli emigration to Ukraine: «We first thought that admitting we are really Khazars was one way to get around [Palestinian President Mahmoud] Abbas’s insistence that no Jew can remain in a Palestinian state. Maybe we were grasping at straws. But when he refused to accept that, it forced us to think about more creative solutions. The Ukrainian invitation for the Jews to return was a godsend. Relocating all the settlers within Israel in a short time would be difficult for reasons of logistics and economics. We certainly don’t want another fashlan like the expulsion of the settlers in the Gaza Hitnatkut [disengagement]».

Ostropoler and Grosser-Spass also quoted an anonymous Israeli intelligence source as saying: «We’re not talking about all the Ashkenazi Jews going back to Ukraine. Obviously, that is not practical. The press, as usual, exaggerates and sensationalizes; this is why we need military censorship».

The Israeli and Ukrainian Jewish plan is to resettle the Ashkenazis from the West Bank in the Russian autonomous republic of Crimea after what they see will be an eventual retrocession of the peninsula to Ukraine. The ultimate plans of Ukrainian Zionists such as Kolomoisky, in addition to such American allies as Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Victoria Nuland and U.S. ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt, is to establish an autonomous Jewish region of Crimea and restore to the peninsula the original Khazarian name of Chazerai. Although the Tatars who live in Crimea and elsewhere today are largely Muslims, the plans to create a Khazar nation in Ukraine will also likely involve global proselytization by Israelis and Ukrainians who are bent on restoring Khazaria as an alternative to Israel. Current Jewish proselytization efforts among «crypto-Jewish» Catholic mestizos in Mexico; Christians, Hindus, and Buddhists in India; Russian Orthodox and Buddhists in Birobidzhan, Siberia; Muslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan; and Christians, Muslims, and animists in Uganda, Ghana, Mali, Nigeria, Zimbabwe, Mozambique, and Malawi; and among small pockets of alleged Jewish descendants in China, Sao Tome and Principe, Tahiti, Suriname, Vietnam, Brazil, and Peru point to an Israeli plan intent on increasing Jewish numbers for the purpose of settlement in a number of locations outside the illegally-occupied West Bank and the Golan Heights. In addition to Ukraine, northern Iraq, eastern Libya, Alexandria in Egypt, parts of Turkey, Patagonia in Argentina, and Uganda are all being considered for potential Jewish settlements to complement the West Bank or replace it. The so-called «Lost Tribe of Israel,» the Bnei Menashe of Mizoram and Manipur states of northeast India are viewed by many Indians as not actually Jewish but desperate economic migrants looking for better lives in Israel. So desperate are the Israeli expansionists to increase their numbers, dubious Jewish DNA studies have attempted to classify the Sorbs of eastern Germany; the Bantu Lemba people of Zimbabwe, Malawi, and Mozambique; and certain groups of southern Italians, Armenians, and Greeks as «lost tribes» of Israel in order to increase Judaism’s numbers and geographical land claims.

In Ukraine, the so-called «second Israel,» Kolomoisky and Kiev have enlisted a number of ex-Israel Defense Force members in their volunteer battalions, including the Azov Battalion, One of the Israeli units is known as the «Blue Helmets of Maidan» and is commanded by an Israeli using the pseudonym «Delta». If Israel did not have a vested interest in expanding its influence in Ukraine it could easily prevent these units from going to Ukraine.

There are also Sephardic Jewish settlers in the West Bank who are descended from the Jewish Marranos of Moorish-ruled Spain who were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula during the Spanish and Portuguese inquisitions of the 15th century who have no ties to Ashkenazis or Khazaria. Recently, in a move similar to Ukraine’s invitation to the Ashkenazis from the West Bank to settle in Ukraine, Spain and Portugal have enacted legislation that would permit any Sephardic Jew anywhere in the world who can prove their descent from the Marranos expelled during the Inquisition to obtain citizenship in the two countries.

Some Russian speakers in the Donbass are wary of the intentions of pro-Israelis in the Kiev government. Oddly, Kolomoisky has recruited a number of neo-Nazis from western Ukraine and Europe to fight in his battalions whose right-wing organizations have always subscribed to the notion of a future «battle royale» between Russia and the remnants of Khazaria in Israel, Ukraine, Poland, and the Republic of Georgia to avenge Khazaria’s defeat in the 11th century by the Russian Empire.

Israel provided the Georgian government of President Mikheil Saaakashvili, which included a number of dual Israeli-Georgian nationals of Khazar descent, with military and intelligence assistance in its 2008 war against South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Similarly, the Israelis have established close ties with Azerbaijan, a country, which like Georgia and Ukraine, has ancient links to Khazaria through an indigenous group of Azeri Jews known as Subbotniks.

The anonymous Netanyahu aide is also quoted by The Times of Israel journalists as revealing why the Israeli government in making a play for large Israeli settlements in Ukraine: «As the Prime Minister has said, no one will tell Jews where they may or may not live in the historic territory of their existence as a sovereign people. He is willing to make painful sacrifices for peace, even if that means giving up part of our biblical homeland in Judea and Samaria. But then you have to expect us to exercise our historical rights somewhere else. We decided this will be on the shores of the Black Sea, where we were an autochthonous people for more than 2000 years. Even the great non-Zionist historian Simon Dubnow said we had the right to colonize Crimea. It’s in all the history books. You can look it up».

The aide revealed to the two Israeli journalists that Netanyahu appreciates the strength of the ancient Khazars and quote Netanyahu as saying, «we are a proud and ancient people whose history here goes back 4,000 years». But the aide added, «The same is true of the Khazars . . . in Europe and not quite as long. But look at the map: the Khazars did not have to live within ‘Auschwitz borders.’»

To the uninformed, which apparently includes President Barack Obama and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, the current Israeli desire to create a new nationalist Israeli identity is tied directly to the activities of the Ukrainian leadership of Petro Poroshenko, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, Kolomoisky, and their American supporters, Nuland and Pyatt, in creating a safe haven, temporary or not, for the Ashkenazi settlers of the West Bank. Thanks to the Times of Israel exposé of the secret Israeli report on the Khazars and modern-day Israel, the machinations behind the American and European Union destabilization of Ukraine becomes all the more apparent.

COMMENTARY: Russia Not For Russians. Why Vladimir Putin Is Not A Nationalist

Did the Soviet Union ever cease to exist? Or did it simply morph into a disguised ‘democracy’? If this magnificent essay does not make you see reality, NOTHING EVER WILL. With the internet and the unlimited possibilities it provides to communicate with those who live there and can tell us the truth, there is no justification for people to remain ignorant of the horrific threat that Putin and ‘his so-called comrades’ are to humanity. The same threat is in those who praise this soviet criminal in the media whatever the source may be and our politicians who are all traitors playing the game to enslave us all under Communism. Open your eyes wide and don’t let the LIES deceive you! 


“Vseslav Volkov: Russia not for Russians. Why Vladimir Putin is not a Nationalist – POKROV,” Source: pokrov.world

There is  common inclination among the right-wingers living outside the countries of the former Soviet Union – which seems absurd  for us (as residents of countries which are firsthand familiar with Putin’s regime) – to imagine Putin’s Russia as the stronghold of “white right conservatism.” Among Putin’s “right-wing friends” in the West, there are many who, alas, went to a conscious cooperation with the Kremlin, in the hope of obtaining political or even financial dividends from it. However, we believe that the bulk of supporters of Putin and modern Russia are people who – for one reason or another – have been deprived of objective information about what is happening in this country, forced to base their assessments on Kremlin sources such as Russia Today, or judging about Russia and Putin on the basis of popular western liberal “horror stories” – giving out wishful thinking. We would like to correct this, and for this, we publish a short review from our adherent, a Russian nationalist who lives in this country and has been involved in the activities of the Russian far-right movement for more than 15 years.


From the author

Dear readers! With these essay I did not set out to give you an exhaustive picture of Putinism and, in general, of modern Russia – this would require a multivolume fundamental work, supported by even more extensive quantitative research and statistical data. This is only a laconic overview, the purpose of which is to induce those of you who really are interested in Russia and its people and are not indifferent to their destiny, to get acquainted independently with numerous testimonies (which are widely available in open access) about the processes taking place in the country. To facilitate this task you can find a list of references to various sources recommended for you in the text and in the footnotes as well as at the end of the article [1] .

  1. A wrong translation

A correct understanding of what is going on in the modern Russia implies an understanding of what it does constitute. In Russian – unlike English – there is a clear linguistic division of concepts «russki» (ethnic Russian) and «rossijski» (relating to Russia as a state). At the same time, both concepts are translated into English as «Russian», but there is a great difference between them.

According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, adopted in 1993 (shortly after the shooting of the then parliament from tanks), the state is a federation built on an ethnic basis, which is reflected in the territorial structure: of the 85 regions, 27 [2] are “homelands” for ethnic minorities of Russia – thus ensuring the representation of their interests at the state level. “Own” regions are possessed by the Tatars, Chechens, Yakuts, Buryats and many other peoples of Russia.

Where, then, is the “Russian Republic” – a region representing 80% of the population of the whole country? There is no such region, there are only denationalized “krays” and “oblasts”, which are “regions for all”. Maybe there is a state body authorized to defend the rights of Russians at the federal level? Again, no. The federal government represents the interests of all citizens of Russia, regardless of nationality.

In the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, there is not even a mention of the Russian (in the ethnic sense) people, as in any other law of the Russian Federation.

Thus, ethnic Russians (~ 80% of the country’s population) even legally do not have any relation to the Russian Federation.

In addition, unlike the numerous diasporas who are in constant contact with the Russian authorities at all levels and successfully lobby their interests, there is no one political or public organization in Russia that would officially defend the interests of the Russians as a people. Any attempts by the Russians to create such an organization are suppressed as manifestations of “extremism.”

1) The main advocate of the interests of the Jewish diaspora in Russia; 2) the newspaper of the Azerbaijani diaspora: “We are for Putin. Putin is for us “

2. Repressions against Russians

Moreover, the very formulation of the question of the rights of ethnic Russians in Russia is fraught with criminal prosecution. Vladimir Putin clearly indicated his position on the “Russian question” yet in the middle of the 2000s, calling the adherents of the slogan “Russia – for Russians ”[3] “jerks and provocateurs” [4], and the struggle “with anti-Semitism, like … with any nationalism and chauvinism, – the basis of our domestic policy [5]”. In addition, such slogans as “Russian power for Russia” and even “Russian, do not drink!”, “”Russian” – means “sober”” [6] are officially considered extremist in Russia.

Thousands of Russian citizens – primarily nationalists – are in prison under “political” articles. The article 282 of the Criminal Code (“Raising hatred or enmity, as well as humiliation of human dignity”) has already become a sad symbol of Putin’s totalitarianism, uniting against itself right-wing and left-wing activists, nationalists and liberals.

Is this a mistake of the Putin system, its defect? Definitely not. In a state like Russia, nationalism is one of the mobilizing forces – the forces that can lead the population out of social “dormancy” and motivate them to political struggle for their rights. The purpose of nationalists at this stage is essentially “the emancipation of the Russian people”, which is unthinkable in the autocratic post-Soviet kleptocracy, in a system where everything is decided exclusively “from the top down”, herewith with “individual approach”, by “agreements.” If it is possible for Kremlin to “reach an agreement” with, for example, the ethnocracies of the North Caucasus (who have long recognized themselves as political actors), simply giving them the next multibillion-dollar subsidies from the dwindling Russian budget, then how to negotiate with 120 million Russians across the country? They will have to radically reorganize the entire system, and the Kremlin does not need this at all. The system is afraid to communicate with large, poorly managed masses of people – even if they demonstrate loyalty.

  1. «Soviet Russia» is an oxymoron

With “historical Russia” – the Russian Empire – the Russian Federation also has nothing in common except the flag and the coat of arms. The RF is the official “continuer” of the USSR [7]a country built on both worldview negation and the physical destruction of the social order that existed in Russia before 1917.

For 70 years, the Soviet system has often undergone cosmetic transformations, sometimes even borrowing elements of “past life” [8], while the real Russia was either physically destroyed (like millions of Russian peasants, officers, clergymen and intellectuals), or “squeezed” into emigration, or forced to go into deep underground. Here is an incomplete list of crimes committed by the Soviet government: the “Red Terror”, the famine of 1920-21, the genocide of the Cossacks, the repressions against the intellectuals in the late 1920s, the “collectivization” (destruction of the peasantry) and the Holodomor (which took place – in addition to Ukraine – in the Volga region and Kazakhstan), the terror of mid-late 1930s, many war crimes during the World War II, post-war repressions, the post-war famine, the testing of nuclear weapons on its own population in the 1950s, technological catastrophe in Chernobyl and many other. A lot of historical works are devoted to this topic, the most “classical” of which are the “GULAG Archipelago” by A. Solzhenitsyn and the “Black Book of Communism” by S. Courtois.

From the point of view of Russian nationalism, not unimportant is also the national composition of the top of the Bolshevik Party, the backbone of which was composed of Jews (more than half) and Caucasians [9].

The Russian resistance to Bolshevism lasted as long as Bolshevism itself:

  • After the October Revolution of 1917 the White Army, many times inferior to the Red forces in numbers, but a much more motivated, better-quality and better-organized, have “defended Russia from Soviet slavery for 3 years “[10];
  • In the interwar period in the south of Russia, in Siberia and other regions underground resistance groups acted, in Europe – Russian emigrants-anti-communists eliminated Soviet diplomats [11], carried out daring subversive attacks on Soviet territory [12], fought against the “red international” in Spain [13], the emigrant anticommunist movement embraced dozens of thousands of people on several continents – from Paris and New York to Shanghai and Harbin;
  • The Second World War gave the Russian people an unprecedented opportunity to crush the regime that destroyed it, but the ill-conceived and often Russophobian policy of the German leadership, and later – skilfully juggling “Russian patriotic themes” on Stalin’s part, buried this undertaking; nevertheless, according to various estimates, from 1 to 1.5 million Soviet citizens fought on the side of Germany and its allies, of which about a half were Russians, including Cossacks, traditional defense and the support of the Russian statehood (an unthinkable phenomenon in Russian history!), and in Central Russia Russian nationalists managed to create their own autonomy with a population of 581,000 people and, together with the Germans, to resist the gangs of red terrorists [14];

  • After the war, the partisan anti-communist movement fought against the Soviet regime not only in Ukraine and Belarus, but also in the Russian republic of the USSR;
  • The anti-Soviet struggle was fought even by prisoners in the camps of the Gulag;
  • Under Khrushchev and Brezhnev, the struggle within the USSR was clearly declining, taking mainly forms of dissident clubs and youth subcultures, but the struggle of emigrants continued, and cases of their participation were known even in the war against the Soviets in Korea and Vietnam.

I allowed myself to take your time by enumerating these numerous examples so that you would understand: for a Russian nationalist they are the real Russia, unlike the USSR, her slaughterer and usurper.

For your final understanding of how – in the worldview of a Russian nationalist, the right conservative – the Soviet Union and the present-day Russia relate to each other, I cite a few quotations:

  • General P. Krasnov, the hero of the anti-Bolshevik resistance, the Don Ataman: “General Vrangel was not mistaken when he said “Goodbye, Motherland!” and not “Goodbye, Russia!”: Russia and the Russians sailed away with him on ships “;
  • Philosopher I. Ilyin: “The Soviet State is not Russia. This historical and political truth must be understood and felt once and for all and to the end “;
  • Writer B. Shiryaev: “The real Russian is not the Soviet, but the opposite, it is the antithesis to him”;
  • Writer I. Shmelev: “No foreign invasion can be worse for the Motherland than the power of Leninists and Stalinists. The USSR is definitely not Russia, but the enemy of Russia “.

[1] Unfortunately most of them are in Russian (but Google Translate is still with us J )

[2] 22 national republics, 4 national autonomous regions, 1 autonomous region

[3] Originally the author of the phrase was the emperor of the Russian Empire Alexander III



[6]https://newsland.com/user/4297790089/content/lozung-quotrusskii-ne-peiquot-priznan-ekstremistskim/4552724, https://www.politforums.net/internal/1387181366.html


[8] For example, under Stalin, who returned epaulets and officer ranks to the army, and also partially “rehabilitated” the church. However, it should be understood that this body had no relation to the pre-revolutionary church, being completely under the control of the Soviet special services and often being headed by their employees


[10] A.Turkul «Drozdovsky under fire» http://www.bookol.ru/dokumentalnaya_literatura_main/biografii_i_memuaryi/148038/str7.htm

[11]http://www.belrussia.ru/page-id-1402.html ,http://www.belrussia.ru/page-id-1404.html



[14] See the map on the next page


4. Back to the USSR?

Thus, for Russian nationalists (if we mean exactly 1) right-wing nationalism, 2) ethnic nationalism, and not another imperial “supranational” utopia) the theme of the “red plague” is not just painful: in the question of defining “friend-or-foe”, support for the complete decommunization of Russia is one of the main criteria.

What do we see in modern Russia?

Famously, in 1991, after an unsuccessful coup attempt by a reactionary part of the Communist elite, which became the catalyst for the collapse of the Soviet system, the USSR crumbled. However, it is necessary to understand that concerning the “personnel” aspect the elite changed little in 1991 – it can be said that the Soviet nomenklatura, “repainted in new colors,” retained its political power. As for the dismantling of the communist system and its symbols, it usually happened at the will of the crowd, while the “leaders of the democratic opposition” for various reasons [1] often tried to contain these impulses (as it was, for example, with the demolition of the monument to F. Dzerzhinsky and the failed assault of the adjacent KGB headquarters) [2].

So, the new government had neither the interest nor the political will to conduct full-scale de-Sovietization, and the mood of the “masses of the people” underwent serious changes – especially after the “shock” socio-economic reforms of the early 1990s, as a result of which tens of millions of people Were below the poverty line. The vague desire for freedom was replaced by disappointment in democracy and longing for a “strong hand” and “great power”. As a result, what was not achieved in the period of “easy decommunization” in the 1990s, now is blossoming again in full bloom in Russia: finally “buried” in the official discourse are the ideas of the burial of V. Lenin mummy [3] and dismantling of his monuments, Which still stand in huge quantities in all cities of Russia (some are even being restored), in the form of Putin’s “Yunarmy”, in fact, the “pioneer organization” is being revived [4], The official mass media and school textbooks vie with each other to praise the charms of the Soviet system, and bookstores are littered with tons of waste paper telling about the “great Stalin and his wonderful reign”. The impulse, as always, comes from the very top: “The collapse of the USSR is the largest geopolitical catastrophe of the century [5]» – the statement by Vladimir Putin leaves no doubt about this.

5.The Day of Defeat

A very vivid manifestation of the cult of Soviets in Russia is the celebration of May 9 – the day of the victory of the USSR over the 3 Reich. In this war the Soviet Union lost 30 million people, left half of the country in ruins and homeless, and, most importantly, retained the power of the regime that destroyed and enslaved the population of this country before for almost a quarter of a century – i.e. not only did it not punish the Bolshevik executioners, but allowed this regime to continue to commit its terrible crimes…

What do the popular masses of the Russian Federation feel? The severity of the incurred losses? Aversion to total, fratricidal wars? The pain of the country of his grandfathers, crucified in those years between Stalin and Hitler? Reconciliation with the former “enemies” (after all, more than 70 years have passed, many generations have already changed, from those realities there is no trace)? Hate to the cannibalistic regime of the Communists, which had been rotting their grandfathers and grandmothers for 25 years, and then – together with Hitler – started the bloody redivision of Europe and the world?

Quite opposite, they are overwhelmed with pride for the “grandfathers-winners” (with whose corpses such red generals as Marshal G. Zhukov literally filled the German positions to obtain through “fearless offensives” honors and new titles), which is typically abundantly “warmed” by alcohol. Most of the “grandchildren of the winners” do not know anything about this war, which they are so proud of – they often do not even know Soviet propaganda tales like “28 Panfilovites” or “Gastello’s exploit”. Do not even know the names of their “heroes” – Soviet war criminals, such as Z. Kosmodemyanskaya [6] and A.Marinesco [7], exalted by Soviet and Russian propaganda as demigods.

If you look closely, it will not be difficult to find signs of hypocrisy, falsity, “fakeness” of this whole celebration. So, almost every year the regional authorities are disgraced, hanging the cities of Russia with banners, in which instead of depicted Soviet soldiers and military equipment there are, at best, American, but more often German ones, including those belonging to the Waffen SS. And the number of “veterans” (which are used as decoration of the holiday, to create an atmosphere of pomposity and solemnity) increases every year, and every year they are younger and younger – there are already a lot of “veterans” who are coevals of the Victory – it seems they “destroyed the Nazis” being in the mother’s womb or in cradle.

To complete the image of this “most sacred” holiday for Russians, it is worthwhile to show how it looks in reality – above all, with what respect they widely use the “sacred symbol of Victory” introduced a few years ago – the “St. George” black-and-orange ribbon (which for several centuries has been a part of the military awards of the Russian and then of the Soviet military) and other symbols:

A war veteran in his chic villa turns to the authorities with gratitude that they do not forget:

For comparison, let us cite the views of representatives of – without exaggeration – the “conscience of the Russian nation”, Russian intellectuals, real front-line soldiers, about this “victory”:

  • Nikulin, Russian and Soviet art critic, professor, member of the Russian Academy of Arts: «… Everywhere everything is the same. Indifference to the memory of the dead is the result of a general brutalization of the nation. Political arrests of many years, camps, collectivization, famine destroyed not only millions of people but also killed faith in good, justice and mercy. Cruelty to one’s own people in the war, millions of victims, easily killed on the battlefields, are phenomena of the same order. How can people respect the memory of their victims, with Pavlik Morozov [8] as their national hero ?! How can you blame people for their indifference to the bones of those who died in the war, if they destroyed their temples, abandoned and befouled their cemeteries? The war, which was conducted by the methods of concentration camps and collectivization, did not contribute to the development of humanity. Soldiers’ lives had no value at all … No monuments and memorials are able to convey the enormity of military losses, to truly perpetuate the myriad of senseless victims. The best memory for them is the truth about the war, a true story about what happened, the disclosure of archives, the publication of the names of those responsible for the disgrace.»
  • Astafiev, writer: «The Soviet militarists are the most rabid, the most cowardly, the most vile, the dumbest of all, which were before them in the world. It was them who “won” 1:10! It was them who threw our people, like straw, into a fire – and Russia was no more, and there is no Russian people either. What was Russia is now called Non-Black Earth, and all this is overgrown with weeds, and the remnants of our people fled to the city and turned into punks – they left the village but they did not reach the city. How many people were lost in the war? You know and remember. It’s scary to call the true figure, right? If to call, then instead of the ceremonial cap, one must wear a schema, get on knees on Victory Day in the middle of Russia and ask his people for forgiveness for the mediocre “won” war in which the enemy was bombarded with corpses, drowned in Russian blood.»[9]
  • Solzhenitsyn, writer, publicist, Nobel Prize laureate: «Many people passed through our prison cells in 1945-46, but they were not the ones who cooperated with Hitler, although some of them were also. There were no guilty, but only those who had just been in the West and were released from the German prison camps by the Americans. It was considered a crime – freed by the Americans. This means that he saw a good life. If he comes back, he will talk about it. The worst thing is not what he did, but what he will say. And all these persons received a ten-year term.».

However, this is a voice in the wilderness. Those who think so in Putin’s Russia are considered “traitors”, while some of them – for not enough “patriotic” reviews of propaganda films about the Second World – are even imprisoned [10].

May 9 can be called a truly unifying holiday – it really unites. It unites the insolent authorities – with their apologetics of Stalin and the “patriotic” calls “to rally around the Kremlin, like the grandfathers, before an external enemy” – and the people – miserable in their everyday impotence, stupid, lacking sense of measure and common sense, having nothing what he could be proud of in the present, and therefore willingly clinging to any myths about “greatness” and about the “sacred victory”, which are fed to him by the satisfied owners of the Kremlin.

A sticker “1941-1945 – we can repeat” is very popular in Russia: the death of millions of people, the ruined cities, famine and terror on both sides – all this through the prism of “victorious” sodomy. And by the way – does anyone still believe that homosexuality is hated in Russia?

[1] They themselves often explained their actions by the desire to “avoid blood”, “not to allow provocateurs,” but it is possible that the reason was different: they already saw themselves as rulers of the “new Russia” and therefore wanted “reconciliation” with the Soviet bureaucratic apparatus


[3] Currently, it is still in the mausoleum at the Kremlin walls on Red Square

[4] Soviet children’s organization, the Bolshevik analogue of Hitler Youth

[5] Not the “red terror”, not the Holodomor, not even World War II!

[6] The Soviet “partisan”, who burned (together with the inhabitants) villages of Russian peasants, in which German soldiers stayed. Issued to the Germans by local peasants (!) and executed.

[7] The commander of the Soviet submarine S-13, who sunk in January 1945 a ship on which there were several thousands of  German refugees – mostly women, old people and children

[8] One of the heroes of the Soviet propaganda: a kid who betrayed his own father for the sake of the communist cause




6.The Russian Federation is a growing Islamic, Asian state

The Muslim holidays of Uraza-Bairam (the Arab Eid al-Fitr) and Kurban-bairam (the Arab Eid al-Adha) are other important for understanding the essence of modern “RFia” holidays.

So, instead of thousands of words:

Moscow, the Russian capital


Saint-Petersburg, the «Northern Venice»…

As it is easy to guess, these holidays have a national scope in the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putin congratulates Muslims with them every year (in 2015 he did it being in the mosque and reading aloud the Qur’an [1]). At the same time and in the place same significant words sounded: “Russia is the successor to the Golden Horde!” [2]. Residents of the currently rapidly Islamizing Russia can hardly argue with this statement.

And such “Muscovites” from year to year prevail in the heart of the capital, on Red Square, during the New Year:

Every year in Russia, the number of Muslims is growing rapidly, both due to visitors from Central Asia and the Caucasus, and due to a number of Muslim republics of the Russian Federation (mostly North Caucasian – ethnically and culturally alien to the Slavs, highly criminalized and corrupt – even by the standards of Russia). Already, they are about 6.5% of Muslims among the Russians (that is, not counting about 20 million immigrants), even according to official data.

Statistics of the economic portal RBC on immigrants in 2015: the total immigrants amount in Russia – from 10.2 to 20 million, illegal – from 3 to 10 million, illegal in Moscow – from 0.8 to 2 million.

An ordinary station of the Moscow metro. Nothing surprising.

Caucasian and silent Russian slaves. A very symbolic photo.

Crowd of V.Putin supporters: on the left – 2012, on the right – 2014.

Muslims, especially Caucasians, are very attracted by the service in the power structures of the Russian Federation. Their number in the law enforcement bodies of Russia is growing every year, they feel more and more confident there.

“Russian” policemen: Caucasian lezginka and Muslim namaz

The Russian army, so widely advertised, including abroad, especially after the Crimean events of 2014, is a separate story.

I have given below plenty of pictures of the relationship between Russian soldiers – ethnic Russians and ethnic minorities, mostly Muslims – so that you can really feel all the “power”, as well as the “Russian”, “Slavic”, “Nordic” spirit of the Putin’s army.

The most popular are humiliations of “brave Russian soldiers” by Muslim soldiers from Dagestan:

Chechens and Ingush (also the North Caucasus):

Other Caucasians (also predominantly Muslims) also do not stand aside:

The Islamist “finger up” (“Allah is One”) – this gesture is now considered a good form in this military unit

The same thing is done by even less “daring” Asians – Tajiks, Kalmucks, Kazakhs, Yakuts, etc.:

However, the most colorful “inter-ethnic climate” in Russia characterizes this incident that took place a year ago:

“Allah akbar!” – “Police, police, here is a woman wearing a hijab, with the head of a child in her hand!” – “No, it’s not interesting, it’s not a rally of Russian nationalists”

02/26/2016 Gulchekhra Bobokulova, a native of Uzbekistan, hired as a nanny for a 4-year-old girl in a Moscow family, cut off the head of her foster child and set fire to the apartment. During 40 (!) minutes, a woman wearing a black hijab and holding a bloody head of a child in her hand was walking along a busy street and urging passers-by to jihad “for Syria” until she was detained by the police. This happened near the entrance to the metro, in the prestigious district of Moscow, not far from the city center. It is noteworthy that at the trial Bobokulova was found insane and released from criminal liability for the acts committed. This means that the possible scenario is miraculous “healing” of the “nanny” in a few years and her release to freedom [3]. Comment is needless.

As in all the other thematic sections, those interested in the life of modern Russia can easily find on the Internet thousands of examples of both blatant behaviors – up to open terror – from “new Russians” towards ethnic Russians, and frankly anti-national policies of the state on this issue.

7. Chechnya is the winner over Russia

A separate, very colorful, story of Russia’s domestic policy is the relationship between the Kremlin and the Islamic republic of Chechnya. In the early 1990s, the leadership of the republic decided to withdraw from the Russian Federation, which was accompanied by internal clashes, ethnic cleansing of the “non-indigenous population [4]». For this reason, in 1994-96 the First Chechen War took place, and from 1999 until about the middle of the 2000s – the Second. As a result of the second war, part of the separatists led by A. Kadyrov swore allegiance to the then new Russian ruler, Vladimir Putin, promising him the stabilization of the situation in the region.

Instead, Putin did not just “forgive” the Chechen fighters, who had cut off the heads of the captured Russian soldiers days before, but assigned them “heroes of Russia”, while the most prominent Russian officers, famous for their battles with separatists and therefore hated by many in Chechnya, were imprisoned [5]. The Kadyrovs – first a father (he died as a result of the terrorist act in 2004), and then – the son – got practically unlimited power in the republic, and often – beyond its borders. There is a large number of Kadyrov’s conflicts with federal Russian ministries (for example, because of their inability to exercise their authority in the republic or because of disputes over the amount of federal “help” to the region) from which he invariably emerges a winner.

Chechnya – that produces almost nothing, the real “economic hole” of Russia, – due to multi-billion subsidies from the state budget [6] is, however, much richer than most regions of the Russian Federation – Spending huge money on construction of chic (quite tasteless) buildings or on one of the most expensive Russian teams – “Terek”. Kadyrov, in turn, lives as a small sheikh – with his palaces, army and hundreds of luxury cars.

It has long been obvious: Putin is afraid of Kadyrov.

R.Kadyrov and his army

This way, in the opinion of the leadership of Chechnya, a “respected person” should go.

Dances on the money of Russian taxpayers – the Chechen national tradition

Young R.Kadyrov is surrounded by Chechen terrorists, including the infamous S. Basayev, who, in particular,  captured in 1995 the hospital in the city of Budennovsk. About 150 people died, 415 were wounded.


And this is a street in Moscow and a bridge in St. Petersburg, named in honor of R. Kadyrov’s father – A. Kadyrov, also a terrorist who called on the Chechens “to kill as many Russians as you can.” It’s funny to hear after this the indignation of Russian politicians about the names of streets in the cities of other countries, isn’t it?

Is this Abu Dhabi? Maybe Doha? No, this is Grozny – the capital of Chechnya

 8.Whom does Russia belong to?

To understand the status of Russians in the modern Russia it is important to know who owns the national wealth of the country, primarily its minerals, the sale of which abroad constitutes the lion’s share of all export revenues of the state. For none of those who have any idea of modern Russia, it’s no secret that the Russian Federation has an openly kleptocratic regime. It is important to note that ethnic minorities occupy an important place among oligarchic groups controlling and consuming the country’s main wealth.

In 2014, Forbes magazine ranked the richest families in Russia [7]. We will quote it, indicating the ethnicity of the families:

  1. the Rothenbergs (5,55 млрд USD) – Jews;
  2. the Gutserievs (4,85 млрд USD) – Ingush (the North Caucasus);
  3. the Ananjevs (4,6 млрд USD) – Russians;
  4. the Sarkisovs (2,7 млрд USD) – Armenians;
  5. the Shaimievs (2,3 млрд USD) – Tatars;
  6. the Mutsoyevs (1,52 млрд USD) – Yezidis (the North Caucasus);
  7. the Magomedovs (1,4 млрд USD) – Avarians (the North Caucasus)
  8. the Bazhaevs (1,24 млрд USD) – Chechens (the North Caucasus);
  9. the Aminovs (1,12 млрд USD) – Jews;
  10. the Zubitskys (0,7 млрд USD) – Jews.

“9 kings of Russian real estate.” Of the 9 top-oligarchs of the real estate market – no one is ethnically Russian. A good illustration of 2013 from the portal Sputnik and Pogrom (at that time it could still be called nationalist and opposition).

A separate issue is the gradual expansion of China in the Russian Far East, which is supported by the Russian authorities. In addition to several islands on the Amur River, simply “donated” to the PRC during the years of Putin’s rule, the Kremlin took even more significant steps in this direction: in 2015, 115,000 hectares of agricultural land in the Trans-Baikal region were given to the Chinese for rent for 49 years. In addition, in the same Trans-Baikal region, for the same 49 years, 1,844,407 hectares of forests adjacent to the state border with China were leased for cutting by the Chinese [8]. For the sake of the Chinese expansion in the Far East, the Government of Russia specifically developed the concept of “territories of advanced development”, which provides, in particular, the possibility of importing foreign workers to such territory without any restrictions.

Most likely, in 49 years – given both China’s overpopulation (and the devastation of the Russian Far East) – these vast areas will be inhabited mainly by the Chinese. If not, our “Eastern brothers” (with their known “love” for ecology) will simply leave there a lifeless desert, taking all the resources away.

A clear picture. The title of the article reads: “China takes patronage over Transbaikalia. The Celestial Empire asks to ensure the resettlement of [its] citizens “

Such maps of China hang in Chinese schools. According to them, the Russian Far East is the territory of the PRC, and according to the official historical literature of China, “Siberia is Temporarily Lost Territory of the Celestial Empire”

9.Gay Parades: not approved, but have long become reality

Contrary to the stereotype (which is frequently encountered in the West) that the very possibility of gay pride parades in Russia is unthinkable, public actions of the “LGBT community” have long become part of the socio-political and cultural life of the modern Russia. At the same time, the notorious legal norm on the prohibition of propaganda of homosexuality among minors is rather a populist profanation of real struggle.

It makes no sense to go into detail in this issue, I will only give the two most colorful illustrations:

[1] http://www.ntv.ru/novosti/1535405/

[2] https://regnum.ru/news/cultura/1976901.html

[3] http://www.mk.ru/social/2016/07/12/nyanya-bobokulova-menya-budut-lechit-tri-goda-potom-vypustyat.html

[4] 25 years ago, only about 70% of the population of the republic were Chechens, now – about 99%

[5] The most prominent of them was Colonel Yu. Budanov, a very popular military man in the army, who many times rescued whole troops of the Russian army by his decisive actions. He was accused of raping and killing a Chechen girl and after his release from prison in 2011 he was demonstratively killed in the center of Moscow. Despite the extraordinary popularity of Budanov among the people and the massive indignation of this event, only several hundred people from the 15 million-Moscow came to the funeral of Budanov in the summer of 2011… That is why the very question “Why there was no social uprise of Russians that days?”would sound ridiculous…

[6] According to R. Kadyrov, “It is Allah who gives him the money”

[7] http://www.forbes.ru/forbes/issue/2014-09/265621-10-bogateishikh-semei-rossii

[8] https://www.opentown.org/news/79981

[9] One of the main Russian pop bands of the late 1990s and early 2000s, which gained national fame through the song “I’m crazy,” singing out lesbian “love”.


10. Russian death

Russia is the richest country. This is evident, in particular, according to the list of the Forbes rating, in which the Russian oligarchs still – despite the crisis and the fall of the ruble – “win prizes”.

Russia owns 40% of all natural resources of the planet, which are estimated by the Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences at $ 350 trillion. or $ 2.5 million for each citizen of Russia.

At the beginning of Putin’s rule – in the early 2000s – Russia was given an unprecedented opportunity: energy prices, in particular, for oil (and, correspondingly, oil products, which accounted for the lion’s share of Russian exports), increased several times. For these 15 “obese years”, Russia could have made a dramatic breakthrough in development – investing in science, and finally making roads for the first time in history not a disaster, but an advantage of Russia. Instead, these riches were either stolen by Putin and his entourage, or spent on pointless events such as the Sochi 2014 Olympics. In the best case, the funds were invested in US securities and were used as a “stash for a rainy day” – i.e. for periods when the inefficient “petroeconomy” of the “northern gas station” was going through hard times.

Citizens of almost all resource-rich countries – from Norway and Canada to the UAE – receive their share from the sale of these natural resources. Russians can only dream about such distribution of income from the mineral resources.

Russia is getting poorer – almost half of the population lives (or rather dies) in poverty [1].

An illustration of the minimum wage in different countries (by far not the richest by European standards)

The central – actually “Russian” – part of Russia is gradually disappearing into oblivion.

The level of population decline in Russia: blue line – birth rate, red – mortality, green – natural increase

As you can see on the graph, at the beginning of 2010 the rate of extinction of Russia declined, reaching zero. Due to what – is seen in the following illustration:

So, we can see perfectly well: the North Caucasus (almost completely non-white and predominantly Muslim) and the Volga region (largely Muslim and non-Russian) reproduce most rapidly. The Russians have not ceased to die out – they are simply replaced by non-Russians. Let me remind you: this infographics does not take into account immigrants, and in fact, for example, the Moscow maternity homes are filled with women in childbirth from Central Asia and Transcaucasia.

Russia as a result of 2015 became the country with the largest HIV epidemic in the world, follows from the UNAIDS report, the UN structure on the prevention of this disease. In terms of the growth rate of new HIV cases, our country is ahead of the majority of the world’s states (including Uganda and Zimbabwe), while the Russian authorities continue to save on financing of drug procurement and prevention. [2]

The leader in this trend is the Middle Urals: in the city of Yekaterinburg 26 693 cases of HIV infection are registered, which is 1.8% of the population of the megacity – that is, every 50th citizen of Ekaterinburg. [3]

The Russians are taking to drink. According to Alexander Nemtsov, head of the Informatics and System Studies Department of the Moscow Research Institute of Psychiatry of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, in Russia up to 40% of the working-age population regularly abuse alcohol, alcoholism affects 2 million people, and alcohol poisonings, mostly vermic substitutes, – 500 thousand[4].

Drugs: according to the Federal Drug Control Service of the Russian Federation, in 2014 the drug consumption market in Russia is 8 million people (regular and occasional consumption), of which 3 million are actively consuming. Every month, 5,000 people die from drug addiction in Russia [5] .

As for education and healthcare, the state of affairs will best be shown by this infographics.

An illustration of the results of 15 years of Putin’s rule (2015): 24,000 schools are closed, as well as 4,800 hospitals, the same number of polyclinics, 2.2 million people died out.

But as for the temples and other real estate of the Russian Orthodox Church – every year there are more and more, because the ROC is a very powerful corporation, with serious business assets (including shady ones), state support and frank claims to power over society.

A clear picture of the development trends in Russia. Red indicates the number of churches, blue – schools, green – hospitals, yellow – clinics.

In order to see how and where “ordinary” Russia lives, outside the metropolitan areas of Moscow and St. Petersburg, just away from the “grand” avenues and tourist “windows,” it’s enough to take advantage of panoramas on Google Maps, and as for me – like In the previous paragraphs – I will show you the most illustrative pictures.

Typical courtyard in the center of a Russian provincial city

Do you feel the atmosphere of the holiday?

The usual news for the Russian hinterland: “In the Urals water with worms flows from the faucets “

Children Hospital. The inscription “Olympic Gamesare more important to us”

Ex-Eastern Prussia. Signed: “68 years ago here was the blossoming German city of Gerdau. Now – the Russian settlement Zheleznodorozhny»


Signed: “Russian Spring”

A dying out northern village

A typical Russian road away from federal routes

“House of Culture”…

Russian ghetto …

Outskirts of Moscow

Typical street of the Russian provincial city

No comments.

Russians are very fond of outdoor recreation …


The inscription on the wall: “Russia is super”

And now let’s look at the Russians themselves – those of them that are most suited to Putin’s regime and, as a rule, are the most zealous of his supporters:

Folk festivals: vodka from dirty sneakers and pancakes from shovels

Young mothers, pride of Russia

The inscription: “Russia, forward! We are Russians, God is with us! “

Wonderful rest

Children want to be like their parents

Son and a loving dad

In a warm family circle

These guys have a great future …

11.The project “Novorossia”: stupidity and neo-Bolshevism in the service of Putin

The Ukrainian Maidan of 2013-2014 was a real shock for the Kremlin. For people who are accustomed to perceive the people as serfs, the very idea that in their “backyard”, in “Little Russia” (which they are accustomed to consider their province and not a sovereign state), the people overthrows the dictator, their adherent and business partner, was unthinkable. Moreover, 2013 was not very prosperous in the economic sense. In these conditions it was necessary to teach a lesson – both to the “younger brother” who got out of control, and to his own people, who, in the opinion of the Kremlin paranoid, seemed to be able to decide to follow the example of Ukrainians. Ukraine had to be “punished”, and Russians – along with a colorful example of “what happens to rebels” – urgently had to get a “patriotic bonus” that could compensate for their beginning to deteriorate reality. Crimea (traditionally considered by the Russian masses “part of Russia, undeservedly presented to Ukraine”) for this came up perfectly.

The organic continuation of the Putin’s occupation and annexation of the Crimea, which met almost no resistance from the demoralized and disorganized post-revolutionary Ukraine, became the so-called “Russian Spring” in the South-East of Ukraine.

Fortunately, in Dnepropetrovsk, Kharkiv, Zaporizhya, Kherson, even in the infamous Odessa [6], and other cities of the South and East of Ukraine, thanks, first of all, to the active actions of the Ukrainian public, such a scenario was avoided.

Gloomy crowd of “Anti-Maidan”

Donbass – in view of the general “resentment” of its elites and part of the population on the Maidan (which pushed the local Donetsk oligarchy-criminal group Yanukovich away from power in the country), as well as significant criminalization of the region – in combination with the situation bordering on Russia and a large number of descendants of migrants from Central Russia [7] – appeared to be an easier target for Putin’s expansion represented by “pro-Russian” separatists.

End of February 2014 Donetsk Neo-Bolshevik separatists establish round-the-clock protection of the Lenin monument [8]

If we discard 1) motley propaganda demagogy, 2) the specific financial and economic interests of the leaders of this movement, then the main goals of the “Russian spring” as a mass movement were the following:

  • The split of “fascist Ukraine” and the annexation of the regions of the South and East of Ukraine to the Russian Federation (how much “Russian” this state is, we have already shown above);
  • The preservation and strengthening of the Soviet and post-Soviet “cultural coordinate system” (it was also colorfully described above), the suppression of Ukraine’s integration into Europe.

Spring 2014. Separatists in Kharkiv under red flags protect their idol – the founder of the USSR V. Lenin from the encroachments of Ukrainians and try to take the city under their control

Can these slogans – and moreover also implemented in practice in the form of an aggressive war against a neighboring, in a direct sense related (in Russia, few families in which there are no relatives in Ukraine) white people – be considered a manifestation of “Russian nationalism”, “Russian right idea”? The answer to this question, in my opinion, is obvious: no.

Very colorfulcharacters.

A portrait and a quotation of the main Stalinist executioner Beria (Georgian by nationality) in one of the institutions of the “DNR”

Remember the orcs from” The Lord of the Rings”

And these beautiful photos were made near the Malaysian Boeing, shot down by militant separatists in the summer of 2014:

Probably it’s also “Russian nationalists”, right?

The Soviet flag along with the imperial tricolor is the brightest example of “Donbass schizophrenia”

Well, “for dessert” – photos of very very “Russian” faces of the “Russian world” of the separatist Donbas:

That’s it, the “civil war” in Ukraine

«For Russian Donbass»…

«Russian» Yakuts or Buryats

«White Donbass. Faith. Russia. People»

«Russian» NegroStalinist

And this “Russian” Islamist from the North Caucasus was not very lucky

Two more, very “Russian” ones


The more surprising is the fact that in 2014, despite years of repression by the state, part of the Russian extreme right public supported this pro-Kremlin adventure. Who are those “strange nationalists”? Here are their main groups:

  • national-bolsheviks; the reason: Stalinism and “Imperialism” are part of their ideological platform [9];
  • part of “old-school fascists” of 1980-90-s (incl. orthodox fundamentalists and several paganist communities); the reason: all the movements of that time, formed mainly in Soviet times, in conditions of ideological isolation and general marginalization, were an example of ideological eclecticism, sometimes – a hodgepodge, the leitmotif of which, again, was an imperial, “great-power” idea;
  • newcomers (in particular, the audience of the site «Sputnik and Pogrom»[10]); the reason: in 2013-14 due to a number of resonant events in Russia itself (including clashes on national soil), a large number of young and “ideologically immature” people, who easily succumbed to these ideological manipulations in the spring of 2014, were involved in the nationalistic environment;
  • part of football hooligans; the reason: football fans have always been a fairly loose and volatile ideologically environment, and work with them has been conducted by the Presidential Administration since the early 2000s.

Representatives of the aforementioned categories probably took the bait of the myth (invented by themselves) about the creation of the “Russian national state” in Novorossia, although in practice there was nothing like this at all. To realize that they were deceived, it took the “right-wingers” many months, years … Someone have not understood the deception until now. And someone …was killed by their own “friends” [11].

12.Russians against «Novorossians»

However, it was clear to the vast majority of reasonable nationalists from the very beginning.

The most famous of the Russian right-wing political figures opposing “Novorossia”: D. Demushkin, A. Belov-Potkin, V. Basmanov, V. Istarhov, Y. Gorsky, B. Mironov, I. Mironov, A. Shiropayev, D. Konstantinov; Bloggers: D. Savvin, S. Loshkarev (Belogvardeets), Stanislav Morozov, Anton Skald and many others.

Radical appeal against “Novorossia” and in support of Ukrainian nationalists came also from the very authoritative in the Russian right environment prisoners – representatives of the autonomous resistance – the “Russian underground”, serving long (often lifelong) periods for loud actions of direct action: N. Korolev (grouping “SPAS” ), A. Voevodin (grouping “Combat Terrorist Organization”), V. Krivets, ABTO, Vokin Brothers and others.

Below are only a few illustrations of support from the Russian nationalists towards Ukraine, which opposes Putin’s aggression:

Nationalists from St. Petersburg help Ukrainians on the Maidan in the winter of 2014.

Nationalists from Russian Belgorod on the Maidan. Winter of 2014

Russian march in Vyatka (Kirov). On the banner there is the inscription “Stop lying, imprisoning and waging wars”, next to the flag of Ukraine.


Russian march in Ryazan

Moscow. Russian right-wingers in T-shirts of the Ukrainian regiment “AZOV”.

Moscow. “Russian May Day-2014”, the flag of the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (“UPA”).

Kazan. ” Glory to Heroes” and the Ukrainian nationalist symbol of the idea of the Nation.

Graffiti from the famous Moscow right graphitist Umka. The inscription: “Brothers”.

Ryazan. “Glory to Ukraine”.

Vyatka (Kirov). ” Glory to Heroes ” and a trident.

“The Russians are against the war with Ukraine.” Russian nationalists take part in the multithousand antiwar “March of the World” in Moscow.

Other photos of the event

Often Russian nationalists use physical force against supporters of “Novorossia”. Here are some of well-known actions: in October 2014, in St. Petersburg, the ultra-right beat up a supporter of Novorossia, in the summer of 2015 an attack was carried out in Moscow on the Communist Patry tent for collecting “help” for Donbass, in St. Petersburg a truck of NOD (movement advocating escalation of aggression against Ukraine) was burned, and in Novosibirsk – another fan of Novorossia was beaten by nationalists.

Another part of Russian nationalists went even further – several hundred right-wing volunteers went to Ukraine (many illegally making their way through border posts) to fight against Putin’s “Russian world” in Ukrainian volunteer battalions: “Donbass”, “Right Sector”, “AZOV”, “OUN” and others. Some of them died in this war, many were wounded, all – became outcasts – in a foreign, poor country, divorced from their families and relatives, deprived of the opportunity to return home to Russia. How deep should there be hatred for the regime to force adults, often already socially held, to consciously take such actions?

Fighters of the Russian Insurgent Army – the formation of Russian volunteers fighting in the East of Ukraine against the pro-Kremlin separatists.

The unofficial flag of Russian volunteers fighting on the side of Ukraine.

Leaflets in memory of the fallen Russian fighters of the “AZOV” regiment

Farewell ceremony with the fallen Russian volunteer of the regiment “Azov”. Kiev, Independence Square.

Russian anti-Putinist volunteer near the pedestal of the liquidated Lenin monument

An 18-year-old schoolboy who fled to Ukraine from Russia to join the ranks of the “Right Sector”

Conclusion. Why do Russians trust Putin so much?

After all of the above, the question can not but arise: “How can a nation that makes up 80% of the population tolerate such a situation in its own country?”.

The main reasons for this are, in my opinion, two factors: 1) the lack of national self-awareness and 2) the paternalistic way of thinking. I will explain:

  • If in the minds of most Russians there is some kind of “national idea”, then this idea is “imperial”, state-centered, etatist. “True” nationalism (as an aspiration to fight for the rights of its own nation – above all against a repressive denationalized state), if it occurs in the mass consciousness, is mostly sporadic – as a reaction to strong emotional irritants such as terrorist attacks or high-profile murders – in this respect, the level of “ethnic consciousness” of Russians does not differ much from the one of Western Europeans;
  • Russians are extremely passive and inert. A Russian man in his mass is not inclined to take responsibility for his actions at all – it is much more convenient for him to feel above himself the absolute power of the “father of the tsar” and of his entourage, which, if failed, can be cursed. To understand the level of “civil activity” of Russians, the example of the already mentioned “Novorossia”, which was supported by the majority of the population of the Russian Federation, is typical: in reality the realization of this project has been dealing (thank God!) with the indifference not only of the state, but of society. Out of 140 million people, a couple of dozen volunteers went to Donbass (many of whom when they were already dead were buried like cattle in unmarked graves near Rostov – compare this with the way the funeral of the fallen soldiers of Ukraine are carried out), the amounts of “donations” are also not comparable neither with the population of Russia, nor with its riches.

Moreover, the current “psycho-emotional” state of Russian society – with his painful love for his own torturers and executioners (Ivan the terrible, Stalin, Putin, even Ramzan Kadyrov) – can be compared with the “Stockholm Syndrome”, burdened, in addition, with hatred to all countries that have escaped an unenviable fate, like Russia. In general, we see here a sort of “imperial sado-masochism” – a longing for the former “greatness” (“it is necessary that everybody all around is afraid of us”), aggravated by the subconscious feeling of the lack of a positive agenda for the development of the country as a unifying national idea [12].


Does it make sense to continue to believe in the illusory myth of the alleged “ideological confrontation between Putin and the left-liberal West” (which in fact is not, as I demonstrated above that Putin’s values in the aspects of interest do not differ much from the values of his “Western colleagues”), – everyone should answer this question for himself.

It should be understood that in this situation, any help to the modern Russian state means support not only for the aggressive policy of the Putin regime, which brings so many troubles and troubles to the surrounding (primarily European) countries, but also support for further enslavement and zombification of the Russian people, destruction in it of the last foci of truly national, European thinking.

If, summing up, I characterized Putin’s rule in one phrase, it would not be an exaggeration to say:

“Putin is the death of the Russian people and a serious threat to other countries.”

T-shirt of the Russian nationalist: “Military coup. We believe. We hope. We wait”

Recommended references:

Crimes of the regime:

Right-wing resources:



World war II, May 9:

The White movement:

Other interesting blogs about Putin and Russia:






[6] Dramatic events of 05/02/2014 Russian media and pro-Kremlin pseudo-patriots like to portray as “the genocide of Russians,” while keeping silent that (1) the clashes that day began with the shooting from the side of “peaceful anti-Maidan” demonstrators, which resulted in death of several Ukrainians, and (2) the national composition on both sides was absolutely diverse, which made the confrontation exceptionally political, not national.

[7] Moved there after the Holodomor of the 1930s, which depopulated the Ukrainian Donbass


[9] In the days when various movements were emerging and gaining ground in Russia, opposing the “creeping occupation” of the country from aliens from Central Asia and the Caucasus, who shortly before conducted the genocide of the Russian-speaking population in their republics, the NBP preferred to fight windmills, “inventing” the oppression of Russians in The Baltic States;

[10] This resource was in 2012-2013 one of the most promising in the “right Runet”. However, the frank “sagging” to the power made by its chief editor Yegor Prosvirinin because of fear of reprisals (at this time a criminal case on “extremism” was launched) during the Crimean events, put an end to this project as the voice of independent nationalists.

[11] “Volunteers” of Novorossia – a poorly managed conglomerate of mischievous adventurers – were and are a headache not only for the Ukrainian side, but also for the “curators” from the Kremlin, who aspire to subordinate the unrecognized “republics” as much as possible, and as for the most independent of their figures – to destroy them physically. Among the leaders of the separatists, already liquidated by Russian special services and their agents (all these actions, of course, are written off to “fantastically professional” Ukrainian saboteurs, although even the most naive Russians are unlikely to believe in these tales), there are such “legendary” commanders as: A. “Batman” Bednov, A. Mozgovoi, “Cossack Ataman” Dremov, leader of the Kharkov “Oplot” movement E. Zhilin (shot near Moscow), A. “Motorola” Pavlov, M. “Givi” Tolstykh, the head of the Lugansk police O. Anashchenko, former leader of the LNR V.Bolotov (poisoned in Moscow) and others.

[12] The best, in my opinion, graphic illustration of this worldview schizophrenia and insignificance of the Russian common man gave the report of Radio Liberty from an abandoned village in the Siberian taiga, a man who first complains about the life and arbitrariness of the authorities, the poverty of the richest country in the world, and then praises Putin and its aggressive foreign policy, including the war in Syria, costing the Russian budget hundreds of billions of dollars annually, because “America is threatening Russia”, and “everyone should be afraid of us”.


COMMENTARY: KGB Agent Vladimir Putin’s War on NATO – Part I, Putin’s Chechen Shock Troops

Finally, someone who connects the dots!! The situation is so obviously clear, that it is scary to see how people let themselves be brainwashed into this globalism madness and all the lies that it implies. Read carefully and next time you listen to the ‘news’ think ten times before reaching a conclusion. Communists are the masters at distortion, lies, deception and complete brainwashing manipulation. 


“KGB Agent Vladimir Putin’s War on NATO: Part I, Putin’s Chechen Shock Troops,  Source: jewishracism.blogspot.co.uk

Vladimir Putin has threatened me, my family, my nation and the world with nuclear annihilation, so I must confess to being a tad bit biased against him. He was a KGB operative for many years and a close friend of Stasi agent Angela Merkel, now Chancellor of Germany. I do not like what these communists are doing to Europe and the rest of Western Civilization. I freely admit that, because I believe Putin is setting us up for a Third World War. Let’s have a look at the dots. . . .

• Communist Barack Obama has gutted our American military. He appointed career Russian apologist Chuck Hagel as Secretary of Defense, where “Global Zero” Hagel set about undermining our military forces, especially our nuclear defenses. Obama appointed communist Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, then replaced her with crypto-Jew John Kerry (Kohn). Obama watched largely in silence as Putin invaded the Crimea and stole it from the Ukraine. Obama gave Russia vital territory and allows Putin to take over the arctic, the window through which ICBMs can attack us.

• Before Jens Stoltenberg became Secretary General of NATO, he was a communist terrorist and KGB agent “Steklov”. The KGB/FSB is in complete control of NATO’s topmost post, as well as the German government, which is a highly dangerous state of affairs.

• Putin is funding anti-NATO political parties and candidates in Europe, so as to turn NATO countries against themselves and one another. Putin’s pet political philosopher, anti-western fanatic Alexander Dugin, wants Russia to convert all of Europe into bolshevik vassal states to serve as a buffer for the reborn Soviet Union (and communist China). When Putin’s ISIS terrorists attacked in Paris, Putin was the sole beneficiary. The KGB’s false flag attack on Paris bolstered Putin’s favorites, the Le Pens, in the polls just prior to an election, and Putin made himself out to be a hero for fighting his false opposition of ISIS in Syria. It is interesting to take note of Marine Le Pen’s Jewish boyfriend Louis Aliot, and Marion Maréchal-Le Pen’s biological father, Mossad agent Roger Henri Auque. Auque’s mother, like Putin, was a communist.

• Putin wants Greece and Turkey at one another’s throats so as to drive a deep wedge into NATO and takeover the Bosporus and Dardanelles shipping lanes into the Mediterranean Sea. He has already flanked NATO nation Turkey in the Crimea, and is about to flank Turkey on the opposing front in Syria. Israel sits in silence as Russia establishes itself on Israel’s border, because Russia ultimately takes its orders from Israel, as does ISIS. It is interesting to take note of the fact that both Syriza and the Golden Dawn of Greece are anti-NATO and support Putin. It is also interesting to take note of the relationship between Putin’s bolshevist political advisor Alexander Dugin and alleged Ergenekon member and marxist chieftain in Turkey Dogu Perincek.

• Putin has reconstituted the Soviet Union in the form of the Eurasian Economic Union, which is swallowing up nations that form a corridor through which communist China can attack Europe. Red China wants to devour Greece and the rest of Europe. Putin is an Asian supremacist communist who wants Europe dead. The KGB long ago infiltrated the Russian Orthodox Church and has made it anti western, together with all the other traditionally European-centric Russian institutions.

• Putin is attempting to cut Europe off from Middle Eastern oil and natural gas reserves, while concurrently attempting to gouge Europe for the cost of Russian energy. He is helping Israel to level Syria and has communists in Turkey destabilizing that nation and communist agents in the European press and governments driving a wedge in NATO by condemning Turkey for defending itself from Russian aggression and the Russian encirclement of Turkey taking place today. Again, it is wise to take into consideration the friendship of Alexander Dugin and Dogu Perincek. Just as the Jewish controlled press hid Stalin’s atrocities while they occurred, they are covering up for Putin today.

When we connect these dots, we draw a map of the communist conquest of Europe. The communists have greatly weakened Europe with a massive invasion of Muslims enabled by the neoconservative Trotskyites and their permanent war on Muslim nations. Europe is now ripe for a full-scale invasion from Russia and China due to the instability the heterogeneous communist terrorism and invasion of foreign elements inspires. Internationalism destroys sovereignty and the loss of sovereignty heralds the loss of a national defense and military alliances.

Putin will try his best to break apart NATO from within and without. He is paying traitors in America to speak out against America and Europe on Russian media and is making it chic for the libertarian crypto-communists here to turn Americans and Europeans against themselves in favor of Russian and Chinese communist interests. This is part of a long-standing KGB war of demoralization on the West. Our dissidents pretend to be fighting the “Zionist West” in the old dialectic Churchill dubbed the war between Zionists and Bolshevists. In that struggle, Western Civilization ultimately loses and the communists are turning us against ourselves.

Far from being an anti-Zionist, Putin richly rewards the Jewish oligarchs of Russia, maintains first-rate relations with Israel, and welcomes in the Jews of Europe into Russia by pleading with them to return to the bolshevik paradise of the Soviet Union he is rebuilding. The wars and the bodies are piling up under and around Putin. He has his Chechen shock troops leading his false opposition front ISIS, which gave Putin a pretext to invade Syria and surround Turkey and NATO in his quest to become the oil and natural gas king of the world. Yet our dissidents react as if it were Turkey that was surrounding Russia, and our own people clamor for the demise of NATO, which is the only alliance standing between us and Putin’s nuclear warheads!

As communists always do, they have our dissidents degrading America and Europe and singing the praises of our communist enemy Putin. Putin is the new Che Guevara for our intellectual class, stylish and chic, poster boy butcher that he is. Yes, the money is flowing to our traitors to betray us to the communists. And they hate us as much as he does. Their hatred of their people, our people, spills off their tongues and issues forth from the safety of their keyboards and First Amendment rights acknowledged by the same US Constitution they seek to destroy.

The Jews have used Turkey and Russia to provoke war time and again, under no lesser figures than Disraeli and Rothschild. History bears witness to the many Russo-Turkish wars that have spilled mankind’s blood across the centuries, no fewer than 12 such horrors, more than my two hands can bear on their ten fingers, which I point now at Putin the war monger, in this accusation.

And Putin has a partner and ally in instigating the revival of this historic mayhem. I speak of Turkish President and Israeli puppet Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who is the controlled opposition of Turkey’s ruling secret society of crypto-Jewish freemasons. I refer to the Ergenekon, who govern Turkey on behalf of Israel from behind the scenes.

Erdogan rose to prominence in order to take the place of Ahmadinejad as the apparent head of the Muslim opposition to Israel. Erdogan sent Kurdish Mossad to Israel on the Mavi Marmara, where the Israeli military immediately executed them for the benefit of the eyes of the Muslim world. That gave Erdogan street credit during the “Arab Spring” which soon followed, and which deliberately sent a wave of Muslim invaders into Europe by design, and straight through Turkey, among other routes.

Today, Russia and Turkey are staging escalating incidents precipitating another world war. The communists thrive on permanent war, which weakens societies leaving them ripe for communist takeover through their permanent revolution. The communists then propose internationalism as the only solution to the war they forever foment, and having achieved it, provoke terrorism to keep themselves in power.

Russia has taken over the Crimea and oppressed the Tartar population. That is a direct threat to Turkey and its interests as a NATO nation and a nation with long borders on the Black Sea and a long history with the Crimea. Russia has invaded Turkish airspace with military aircraft and flown countless bombing runs on Turkey’s borders. Imagine Putin’s response if Turkey had done the same to Russia when it invaded the Ukraine. I don’t understand how anyone can fail to see Russia’s aggression against Turkey.

The Russians are bombing the hell out of Syria and are in bed with ISIS so as to provide a pretext for the destruction. Putin’s Chechen’s are heavily involved in ISIS as well as the invasion of the Ukraine. Russians control ISIS through Chechens, together with Israel and Turkey. Terrorism is textbook communist behavior. ISIS is there to provide a pretext for destruction, which compels intervention. Israel has wanted Syria destroyed for 2,500 years (Genesis 15:18-21. Isaiah 17. Jeremiah 49:23-27.) and is encouraging Russia to aid in grinding the nation of Syria to bits. Does not Israel’s silence regarding Russia’s military presence on their borders speak volumes? So much for our supposed greatest ally in the Middle East.

The Russians sent in Chechens to lead both sides of the fighting in Syria against each other, and turn Syria to ruins. The head of ISIS in Syria Abu Omar al-Shishani is a Soviet operative who has made his career providing Putin with pretexts for invasion. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Omar_al-Shishani

Putin has created the problem in Syria with his Chechen shock troops, and now provides the response with more Chechen shock troops. See: Putin should unleash Chechen troops on Isis, says region’s president

Putin did the same in Chechnya, Georgia and then the Ukraine. After Putin invaded the Ukraine, and lied to the world by claiming the little green men were not his forces, Putin sent in Chechen shock troops to attack Ukrainians defending their soil from Russia. See: Chechen Muslim ‘Death Battalion’ joins Russia’s war in Ukraine

Now Putin is sending in Chechen shock troops to provide another pretext for Russian aggression in the Ukraine, ISIS trained Soviet Chechen troops. See: Chechen Jihadis Leave Syria, Join the Fight in Ukraine

Are you starting to see the pattern those dots trace out?

See also:

KGB Agent Vladimir Putin’s War on NATO: Part III, Putin’s Jewish Revenge on Germany

KGB Agent Vladimir Putin’s War on NATO: Part II, PEGIDA Is a KGB Front

KGB Agent Vladimir Putin’s War on NATO: Part I, Putin’s Chechen Shock Troops

Crimean Tartars

VIDEO: Jewish Bolshevik Also Tried To Create A Jewish State Before Israel

Don’t you dare deny the Holocaust! How about telling the truth about Crimea and what Stalin did there, besides the Holodomor? It seems that the Bolshevique Jews wanted to create a Jewish State in Crimea before they went to Palestine and did some of their ethnic cleansing ‘speciality’ in Palestine. Spread the truth!