COMMENTARY: New UN Chief To Europe – Ignore Voters, Open The Borders

Opening all borders in the EU, that is how communism continues its work and so does most of the alt-media in the US including Alex Jones. We are living dangerous times when many times it is difficult to tell right from wrong.  But, when it comes to the EU, we must keep our eyes wide open because they are pushing for a Soviet Europe which has been the intention all along. Putin ‘appears’ to the world as opposing the NWO, but the truth is that he is disguising Russia as a free country when his actual intentions are to expand his power to the EU.

The UN is ruled by extreme communists and Putin is part of the game! In the meantime, the US continues being brainwashed one more time into believing that Putin is ‘on our side’, while Trump who we want to believe is ‘ignorant’ keeps surrounding himself with ex-Goldman Sachs and people like Michael Flynn who is a Putin fan. Trump’s right hand – Infowars, continues to beat the drums for Russia every day on their show. 

“New UN Chief to Europe: Ignore Voters, Open the Borders,” Source:

Incoming United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres last week urged European Union politicians and bureaucrats to ignore voters and open up their borders, claiming the growing Islamic tsunami of African and Middle Eastern immigration into the West was “inevitable” anyway. Critics were outraged. Speaking like a committed globalist, the Socialist UN boss also argued that “multi-ethnic,” “multi-religious,” and “multi-cultural” societies would be the only ones to succeed.

On a visit to Communist China this week, though, not a word was said by the new UN chief about the brutal regime’s penchant for kidnapping savagely persecuted North Koreans and sending them back to be tortured and then murdered by the most barbarous totalitarian dictatorship on the planet. Instead, Guterres praised the communist tyrants in Beijing, currently engaged in what experts call the “cultural genocide” of Tibet, and encouraged the regime to continue pursuing its leadership role in what the UN refers to as “global governance.”

At a think-tank conference for European policymakers in his hometown of Lisbon, dubbed “Vision Europe Summit,” Guterres attacked the idea that sovereign nations have a right to control their borders.

“The idea that management of migration is a matter of national sovereignty is extremely limited,” he was quoted as saying in European media reports later picked up by Breitbart. “The truth is that in the meantime, the real controllers of international mobility are the smugglers and criminal organizations. It must be recognized that migration is inevitable and will not stop.”

In essence, Guterres argued that only open borders and legal mass migration could shut down people-smuggling organizations. Developing “legal migration opportunities,” the incoming UN boss said, is the “only way to fight against criminal networks.” Similar arguments might be made for burglary, rape, racketeering, assassination services, abortion, and more — just legalize it, then criminals will not control the market for it.

Other top UN officials, such as Bilderberg operative, Goldman Sachs man, and UN migration czar Peter Sutherland have made similarly outrageous remarks.

“I will ask the governments to cooperate, to recognize that sovereignty is an illusion — that sovereignty is an absolute illusion that has to be put behind us,” Sutherland argued last year in an official UN publication. “The days of hiding behind borders and fences are long gone.”

In short, the UN is waging open war on national sovereignty, in part through its extreme demands for open borders and mass immigration into the West.

Guterres was also clear in his recent remarks: Politicians and policymakers must ignore citizens and voters in order to choose the “values” of open borders and the end of nations.

“When elected officials hesitate to choose between values and the next election, I would advise them to choose values,” he said, with “values” standing not for traditional Judeo-Christian values or even democratic values of self-government, but rather, for extremist globalist and socialist values. “If they go for short term [electoral gain] they will lose both, because there will always come a time when they lose an election. At that point, it becomes very hard to recover the values that have been abandoned.”

The longtime Socialist Party leader, who served as the prime minister of Portugal and led the globalist and totalitarian-minded Socialist International alliance for five years, also argued — yet again — that the massive migration swamping the Western world “is not the problem, but the solution.” In a TV interview earlier this year, Guterres, who led the UN “refugee” bureaucracy before being selected to lead the full dictator-dominated UN, referred to opponents of open borders as “irrational.” “Migration is, in my opinion, part of the solution to the global problems,” he added, without specifying which alleged problems open borders would supposedly solve.

Despite calling for ignoring or outright defying voters, Guterres also suggested that governments should manipulate public opinion by trying to convince their subjects that the open-borders extremism is actually good for them.

“We must convince [Europeans] that migration is inevitable and that it is the multiethnic societies which are multicultural and multireligious who are building wealth,” he said.

Critics, though, blasted the false claims and suggested the comments urging policymakers to defy the citizens they ostensibly represent and serve were dangerous, outrageous, and extreme. Breitbart London also cited a growing body of data showing that, rather than making European countries more prosperous, massive Third World immigration is serving as a huge drain on public funds. In the Netherlands, for example, some two-thirds of non-European immigrants who arrived during the 1990s are still living on tax-funded welfare payments, according to Dutch research. Similar trends have been observed in other European nations with bloated welfare states and massive immigration.

Other critics of the open-borders extremism touted by Guterres and his comrades have been even more blunt. Hungarian Prime Minster Viktor Orban, for example, has argued that globalist-engineered wave of Islamic immigration into Europe was orchestrated by a “treasonous conspiracy.” The goal of the “internationalist fanatics” behind the plotting, he said, was to undermine the West, Christianity, culture, and the nation-state itself as part of the globalist push to create what establishment figures around the globe often describe as a “New World Order.”

UN and EU bureaucracies are all on the bandwagon, too. UNESCO, for example, which is seeking to globalize the indoctrination of children, recently helped produce a TV commercial encouraging German women to wear Islamic head scarves as part of “tolerance.” The UN refugee bureaucracy, meanwhile, is in charge of selecting immigrants from around the world to be settled in the United States at taxpayer expense. And the extremism is only getting worse.

Ironically, Guterres’ comments in Lisbon last week were a sharp contrast to those made before a brutal totalitarian regime. The new UN boss, set to take office on January 1, was in China to meet with its brutal Communist Party dictator, Xi Jinping. (His regime fervently backed Socialist Guterres after Bulgarian Communist Party operative and UNESCO boss Irina Bokova’s campaign for the post imploded amid scandal and public exposure.)

“China is more and more involved in international affairs, and that is very much welcomed,” Guterres told the regime’s propaganda and espionage service Xinhua.

But unlike his comments to European leaders urging them to defy voters and open the borders, there was no lecturing of the savage Chinese regime by Guterres on refugees or opening its own borders. And that is despite the fact UN itself documented that Beijing has forcibly returned tens of thousands of North Korean refugees — knowing full well that they would be imprisoned, tortured, and executed by Beijing’s close barbarous ally Kim Jong Un. The regime in China calls the North Koreans “economic migrants” and claims they are not entitled to protection, sending them home to face a certain murder following savage torture.

Instead of urging Beijing to stop murdering North Koreans, persecuting Christians, harvesting organs from Falun Gong practitioners, censoring the Internet, jailing and torturing critics, forcing women to abort their children, and other barbaric practices, Guterres had nothing but praise for the tyrants in Beijing. According to the left-wing establishment mouthpiece New York Times,

“Mr. Guterres’s visit, which ended on Tuesday, was another chance for China to promote its growing role in global governance.” “Mr. Guterres praised China during his visit,” the Times added.

The feeling was apparently mutual, with the dictator, Xi, showering praise on the UN dictators club and calling it “the most universal, representative and authoritative intergovernmental international organization.” Indeed, as The New American has reported in a series of in-depth investigations, the brutal regime in Beijing — installed with crucial support from Western globalists — is set to play a key role in the so-called “New World Order” being imposed on humanity. Guterres expressed delight at the growing role the Chinese Communist Party is playing in “global governance.”

The new UN chief’s affinity for open borders and brutal communist dictatorships, though, is hardly surprising. As this magazine documented when his selection was announced, Guterres has a long history of promoting socialism, globalism, and other violent extremism. Perhaps among the most significant red flags (no pun intended) on Guterres’ troubling résumé was his presidency, from 1999 to 2005, of the Socialist International. Often referred to as SI, the outfit is a global alliance of socialist and communist political parties from around the world, including many re-branded “former” communist parties from the Cold War era that murdered and tortured huge numbers of people. Despite the lack of coverage the outfit receives from the U.S. establishment media, the SI alliance is extraordinarily powerful — especially at the UN, where its members control a massive voting bloc and multiple UN bureaucracies.

The outfit is also extremely radical and dangerous. To understand just how extreme Socialist International is, consider that, in 2012, the alliance unapologetically held its annual Congress in an African nation led by a Marxist-Leninist SI-member political party that, according to leading genocide experts, was at that very moment engaged in the planning and preparation phase of genocide in a bid to exterminate an embattled minority group. Earlier that year, the president and party chief who hosted the SI Congress even went on national television to sing songs in front of his military celebrating massacring members of the minority group with his “machine gun.” SI profusely praised its hosts nonetheless.

Unsurprisingly, the brutal communist regime in Beijing was represented at the summit, too. “Vice-Minister of the International Department of the Communist Party of China Central Committee” Liu Jieyi, for example, lectured assembled attendees on the “social democratic response to the financial crisis.” Seriously. Representatives from murderous and unfree regimes and totalitarian parties from around the world were also in attendance, demanding more “global governance,” more wealth redistribution from Western taxpayers to their corrupt governments, what they call “Global Welfare Statehood,” and other extremism. SI has previously called for “world government” in official statements.

Guterres’ call for Western governments to defy voters and citizens, and his ludicrous claim that immigration policy is not a matter of national sovereignty, illustrate perfectly why the United States must urgently exit the UN and evict its headquarters from U.S. soil. Legislation to do that, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act, is already sitting in Congress waiting for enough public pressure to force its passage. With globalists increasingly coming out of the closet with their dangerous totalitarian extremism, the time to demand an American exit from the UN — or an “Amexit” — is now.



Rothschilds & Clintons

COMMENTARY: They’re Selected, Not Elected – Rothschild’s Hosts $100,000 a Plate Dinner for Guess Who

“If we want to combat environmental issues, war, poverty, and all of our other problems, we can’t keep looking to political ‘leaders’ like Obama and international organizations like the UN, who simply give their speeches as they’ve always done, year after year. None if it ever seems to change anything at all. They know of the solutions, and have known for years. These are people/organizations who act as puppets and mouthpieces for those in real power…”

“It’s a Big Club, and you ain’t in it!” These are the words of the late comedian George Carlin. Politicans are indeed for sale. Say “Jump!” (when flashing large sums of money), and the likes of Hillary will say “how high?”

Rothschilds & Clintons
Rothschilds & Clintons

“They’re Selected, Not Elected – Rothschild’s Hosts $100,000 a Plate Dinner for Guess Who,” Source:

Politicians are literally walking billboards for giant corporations who dish out millions of dollars in campaign contributions. This year’s campaign saw massive amounts of attention paid to this fact, and the idea that U.S. elections are actually rigged. Even if you don’t believe they’re rigged, the superdelegate process alone completely undermines democracy. Elections in the U.S. seem to be a form of entertainment, a mere distraction, more so than a real process of democracy and election. Every time elections come around, we are witnessing the illusion of democracy, and it’s not a secret.  Politics, elections, and government policy are not controlled by the politicians; they seem to be the ‘fall’ people. They too take orders, and have a ‘boss.’ Above the government sit the corporations, and above them the big banks. This is the current power structure of modern day global dominance. Foster Gamble from Thrive gives an excellent visual depiction of it in this clip from the Thrive documentary.

Apart from corporate sponsors like big oil and energy companies, it’s not a secret that Hillary has the banking of those who literally control the supply of money, those who basically created this entire system. A great example comes from a $100,000 a head fundraiser at the home of Lynn Forester de Rothschild, a prominent New York businesswoman, and a member of the famous Rothschild banking family. A family that has been accused of, as Jay Syrmopoulos from The Free Thought Project  puts it, “pulling the strings of many different governments through their control of various economic systems throughout the world.” Prior to this fundraiser, Wikileaks Clinton emails release shed further light on Hillary’s relationship with the Rothschild family.

Politicians are for sale. A 2014 study from Princeton University revealed that the United States is not a democracy or a republic, but rather an oligarchy where the balance of power and control of global resources lies within the hands of a very small, tight-knit group of people, and that these groups of people basically control and dictate government policy.  You can see corporate influence in so many areas; the TPP is one out of many great examples .

The 29th president of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt might have said it best by stating that “presidents are selected, not elected” and that “behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing to allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.” (source)

Even the very first British MP, Benjamin Disraeli, wrote that “the world is governed by different personages to what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”  (Coningsby, Book 4, Chap. 15.) – Page 131

Senator Daniel K. Inouye told the world that “there exists a shadowy government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of the national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the law itself.” (source)

In the informative video below, journalist Abby Martin of The Empire Files tells it like it is, explaining that Hillary Clinton is the top pick by big corporations to keep the American empire running. It has become almost commonplace to say that we live in a ‘corporatocracy,’ not a democracy, and more people are coming to understand that whoever is ‘elected’ to be president will have been selected to be there by those who control the seat of the presidency: the financial elite.

I’ll leave you with one last quote that relates to what I am getting at here.

The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation … The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties … [and] control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques, which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection. (source)(source)

The quote above comes from John F. Hylan, who was the Mayor of New York City from 1918-1925. To see more quotes that are similiar, you can read this article.

If we want to combat environmental issues, war, poverty, and all of our other problems, we can’t keep looking to political ‘leaders’ like Obama and international organizations like the UN, who simply give their speeches as they’ve always done, year after year. None if it ever seems to change anything at all. They know of the solutions, and have known for years. These are people/organizations who act as puppets and mouthpieces for those in real power, those who apparently care little about us or the planet. The people we think are in power are like gaudy jewels meant to catch the eye and distract the mind. The people who are actually in power are clever, fooling us with words that resonate with the soul and make headlines. Dark acts are always done in the disguise of good deeds, capturing people’s hearts. Don’t continue to be bamboozled. Turn your eye away from them, change will not come from them, it never has and it never will. Change can only come from you and me. If we keep looking to them to provide the solutions and take care of our planet, the planet will continue to get trashed as it always has. It’s how we got here in the first place.

We cannot continue to give our power away and charge others with taking care of our planet. The only way things are going to change here is if we come together as one human race. Governmental policy reflects nothing but corporate interest, and we simply can’t afford to sit around much longer, letting our planet suffer.

“Democrats and republicans are two wings of the same bird, and the flight path doesn’t change.”  – Unknown.

How Do We Address This Problem? What’s The Solution?

Awareness is the first step. There are still too many thinking that the United States is actually a democracy. Awareness alone has and will create a global shift in consciousness, which alters the way the masses look at the western political process. That fact that not everything is as we are told it is will continue to come to light.

Although this is just one area, politics, it’s important to at least identify the problem and it seems that we are still in the process of doing just that.

This is why it’s important to share and engage with/in alternative media.

As far as solutions go, there are many. From developments like those that could completely wipe out the fossil fuel industry and more, the solutions are there. The problem is implementation, and the tremendous power these financial elite have with regard to delaying and silencing these solutions so they can keep their place atop the pyramid.

The more we continue to be aware, pay attention, ask questions and raise our voice, the more we continue to manifest a new human experience. It’s not going to happen overnight, and although an ultimate solution to remove these people from their place of power seems to be unidentifiable right now, staying quiet is definitely not an option.

EU Babel Poster

COMMENTARY: Kalergi’s Baby – The Hydra That Is The European Union

Ever since the Jews began infiltrating European countries, the world started deteriorating morally, financially and spiritually. This is a fact, and there is abundant historical proof. If we do not try to stop them, no politician will ever do. 


EU Babel Poster


“Kalergi’s Baby: The Hydra That Is The European Union,”  Source:

Europe has a long and bloody history. Empires have risen and fallen, wars have repeatedly redefined national borders, and the human cost has been untold amounts of death and suffering.

Today, however, there are no wars within Europe and we are all, apparently, ‘united in diversity’.

The motto of the European Union since 2000, these three short words tell us exactly what we should think. No doubt no expense was spared in hiring a top PR firm to come up with this nifty-sounding Orwellian slogan that, in true Big Brother fashion, works to brainwash the masses into believing we truly are stronger together — a ‘many heads are better than one’ scenario.

Rewind almost 3,000 years to the first account of the mythological hero, Heracles, who was tasked with twelve labours by Hera in the hope that he would be defeated and killed. His second labour was to slay the Hydra, a many-headed serpentine creature that was raised by Hera to kill Heracles, and which lived in the lake of Lerna near the entrance to the Underworld. Heracles, however, proved too wily for the Hydra. Using strength and ingenuity, and the assistance of his nephew, Iolaus, Heracles decapitated each head until none were left and the Hydra was dead.

While the mythical creature will only ever be such, the metaphorical many-headed Hydra is alive and thriving in the form of the European Union today.

For the moment, let’s take a much shorter trip back in time to the 1920s when Hemingway was living and travelling in Europe. With each country still sovereign and its people unique, Hemingway experienced life in Paris as very different to that in Pamplona, the Italians unlike the Austrians, and each border crossing a doorway to a unique combination of landscape, language, customs and food.

While Hemingway was busy hanging out with his writerly and socialite friends, an Austro-Japanese man named Count Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi co-founded the Pan-European Union with Archduke Otto von Habsburg in 1922. Both men were Freemasons. The following year Kalergi published the manifesto, Pan-Europa, in which he writes:

The biggest obstacle to the accomplishment of the United States of Europe is the one thousand years old rivalry between the two most populated nations of Pan-Europe: Germany and France.

After reading Pan-Europa, German-Jewish banker and Freemason Max Warburg contacted fellow Freemason Baron Louis de Rothschild to facilitate an introduction to Kalergi, a meeting that resulted in Warburg donating 60,000 marks to finance the movement for three years. This was just the beginning of 1924. A year later, in 1925, Warburg arranged for Kalergi to travel to the United States to meet his brother Paul Warburg and Jewish-American financier Bernard Baruch. That same year Kalergi published Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism).

Marian Mihaila, Assistant to the Grand Master of Romanian Masonry, writes in the Autumn 2006 issue of the Masonic Forum Magazine:

[Kalergi] was encouraged and financed by a series of American masons who wanted to create thus, according to the American model (the first masonic state in history), the United States of Europe.

An interesting side note is that Max Warburg’s funding of Pan-Europa came just seven years after he worked with Kaiser Wilhelm II and the German High Command to orchestrate Lenin’s return to Russia in a sealed train in April 1917. Lenin and his fellow exiles on the train were carrying $6 million in gold to finance the overthrow of the Provisional Government.

Paul Warburg’s brother-in-law Jacob Schiff, Jewish-American banker and head of New York investment firm Kuhn, Loeb and Company, was one of the principal financiers of the Bolshevik Revolution, donating $20 million to the cause and funding Leon Trotsky’s return passage to Russia in March 1917. (Trotsky was a Ukrainian Jew who was born Lev Davidovich Bronstein.)

Thus, in the early 20th century the capitalists of Wall Street not only funded a movement to unite all Western European countries, they also funded communism, which, as we know, united all Eastern European countries under the Soviet Union.

In 1923, Trotsky wrote an article for Pravda entitled, “Is The Time Ripe For The Slogan: ‘The United States Of Europe’?”, in which he states:

Europe will be able not only to maintain herself, but to consolidate and build herself up, once she has broken down the customs barriers and his united herself economically to the inexhaustible natural riches of Russia. “The United States of Europe” – a purely revolutionary perspective – is the next stage in our generally revolutionary perspective.

In addition to Kalergi being supported by Jewish bankers, he was also supported by the Austrian Freemasons. An article in the March 1925 edition of the masonic magazine The Beaconreads:

Freemasonry, especially Austrian Freemasonry, may be eminently satisfied to have Coundenhove-Kalergi among its members. Austrian freemasonry can rightly report that Brother Coundenhove-Kalergi fights for his Pan European beliefs … Brother Kalergi’s program is a Masonic work of the highest order, and to be able to work on it together is a lofty task for all brother Masons. [Kalergi joined the Masonic Lodge in Vienna in 1921.]

Freemasons were also working on another front towards a united Europe. In September 1929, Freemason Aristide Briand, the French Foreign Affairs minister, gave a speech at the League of Nations (precursor to the United Nations) in which he proposed the establishment of a federal European union. The basis of his plan was economic, but his fundamental aim was political union.

Since Kalergi moved in aristocratic and political circles, his ideas attracted European heads of state as supporters and collaborators, as well as known figures such as Sigmund Freud, Thomas Mann and Albert Einstein, all Freemasons. In 1926, the first Pan-Europa meeting took place in Vienna with 2,000 attendees. At this meeting Kalergi was elected as president of the Central Council, a position he held for 49 years, until his death in 1972. He was succeeded by Otto von Habsburg.

The Jewish Telegraphic Agency reported on the meeting as follows:

Several Jewish European leaders took a prominent part in the first Pan-European Congress which opened here Sunday, when the movement to establish a United States of Europe, modelled after the United States of America, took definite shape. […] Many individual European Jews are furthering the Pan-European movement by giving it financial support.

Count Coudenhove-Kalergi, who is married to Ida Roland, a Jewess, when interviewed by the representative of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency here expressed his opinion that the Pan-European movement ought to find particular support on the part of the Jews who are scattered throughout the various countries in Europe. The creation of the United States of Europe would be beneficial to the Jews as it would eliminate racial hatred and economic rivalry, he said.

While Hemingway left Europe to return to the United States in 1928, Kalergi pushed forward with his Pan-European vision proposing Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” as the European anthem (1929), and that there be an annual designated Europe Day (1930). Beyond these two suggestions being adopted by the current European Union, Kalergi’s influence on not only its formation but also its shape cannot be understated.

His original vision was for a world divided into only five states: a United States of Europe that would link continental countries with French and Italian possessions in Africa; a Pan-American Union encompassing North and South Americas; the British Commonwealth circling the globe; the USSR spanning Eurasia; and a Pan-Asian Union whereby Japan and China would control most of the Pacific. (Wikipedia)

The movement towards this vision picked up pace following World War II, drawing international support from Winston Churchill to Harry S. Truman, both 33rd degree masons. In December 1945 Kalergi penned an article that was published in Collier’s magazine in the United States. Truman, impressed with the ideas expressed, adopted as policy the promotion of a United States of Europe.

To this end the American Committee on United Europe (ACUE) was created in 1948, with William Donovan, wartime head of the Office of Strategic Services (precursor of the CIA), appointed chairman, and Allen Dulles (CIA Director, 1953-61) vice-chairman. The ACUE heavily financed the European movement, with further covert funding being funnelled through the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation. Behind the scenes the Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group also backed a united Europe, with the former supporting the idea of a single currency as early as 1955.

Meanwhile back in Europe, during a speech in Zurich in September 1946, Churchill called for a United States of Europe:

We must build a kind of United States of Europe. […] Much work has been done upon this task by the exertions of the Pan-European Union which owes so much to Count Coudenhove-Kalergi … The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of a single state less important. Small nations will count as much as large ones and gain their honour by their contribution to the common cause. […] The first step is to form a Council of Europe. If at first all the States of Europe are not willing or able to join the Union, we must nevertheless proceed to assemble and combine those who will and those who can.

Less than a year later Kalergi founded the European Parliamentary Union in July 1947. The EPU, along with the European Movement, founded the same year by Churchill’s son-in-law Duncan Sandys, played a leading role in the Congress of The Hague in May 1948. However, the European Movement eclipsed the EPU in significance when it founded the Council of Europe in 1949, one of the current seven major institutions of the European Union today. In 1950 the EPU merged with the European Movement and Kalergi was elected as honorary president in 1952.

That same year Jean Monnet, President of the High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community (now European Commission) from 1952 to 1955, wrote the following in a letter to a friend:

Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.

The Treaty of Lisbon, which came into effect in December 2009, was the culmination of the conspiracy to achieve superstate by stealth. While the cogs are still moving to bring every nation fully under the control of the European Union, the treaty — containing the components the unratified European Constitution of 2004 under a more palatable name — is a blueprint for consolidation of power in the hands of the unelected few. Crucially, it strips the power of veto from national governments while binding all countries to comply with and implement policy passed by those same unelected few.

The European Union superstate is, however, a stepping stone to world government. Paul Warburg’s son James, speaking at the United States Senate in February 1950, said:

We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.

James Warburg’s statement is an extension of Kalergi’s vision to consolidate the entire world into five states.

European Union Flag

Within just ten years following the end of World War II, Kalergi’s early initiative to establish a united Europe had gained enormous international support and funding, both of which spawned yet more initiatives, movements and organisations, something which was to become the defining feature of the European Union we know today.

Currently there are seven primary institutions of the EU: the European Parliament, The European Council, the Council of the European Union, the European Commission, the Court of Justice of the European Union (composed of three courts: the Court of Justice, the General Court and the Civil Service Tribunal), the European Central Bank (composed of the Executive Board, the Governing Council, the General Council and the Supervisory Board), and the Court of Auditors.

On top of the seven primary institutions and their offshoots are presently 48 agencies, composed of 37 decentralised agencies, six executive agencies, two Euratom (European Atomic Energy Community) agencies, and three independent bodies. Of the 37 decentralised agencies, eleven were formed over the course of 24 years (1975-1999), whereas 26 were formed over the course of just eleven years (2011-12). Two more agencies are proposed to be included: the European Public Prosecutor’s Office and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency.

There are also two consultative committees, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, plus The European Investment Bank. In addition, there are three inter-institutional bodies: the Publications Office, the European Personnel Selection Office and the European Administrative School. And the European Anti Fraud Office.

Next up is the European Civil Service, composed of 34 directorates-general, which serves the European Commission. Then there’s the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union, composed of seven directorates-general, which serves the Council of the European Union, the Presidency of the Council of the European Union, the European Council and the President of the European Council.

Head spinning yet?

Aside from the enormous costs involved in maintaining this bureaucracy, from employee salaries and expenses to overheads on 98 EU buildings in Brussels and Strasbourg, thousands and thousands of reams of paper have been generated to document the 120,000 or so regulations and directives that comprise European law which, significantly, trumps the national law of each country within the European Union.

Article 288 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union reads as follows:

To exercise the Union’s competences, the institutions shall adopt regulations, directives, decisions, recommendations and opinions.
– A regulation shall have general application. It shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
– A directive shall be binding, as to the result to be achieved, upon each Member State to which it is addressed, but shall leave to the national authorities the choice of form and methods.
– A decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed.
– Recommendations and opinions shall have no binding force.

Reportedly, if one were to stack the paperwork for all current EU rules and regulations they would reach the top of Nelson’s Column. In other words, 51.6 metres of paper. Let’s say each ream is approximately 6 centimetres tall, this would amount to 860 reams, or 430,000 pages of regulations (much more than Bukovsky refers to below).

In June 2006 Soviet dissident Vladimir Bukovsky, in a speech in Brussels, had this to say about EU regulations:

When you look into all this bizarre activity of the European Union with its 80,000 pages of regulations it looks like Gosplan [the Soviet State Planning Committee] … an organisation which was planning everything in the economy, to the last nut and bolt, five years in advance.

Bukovsky draws further parallels between the Soviet Union and the European Union, likening the European Parliament to the Supreme Soviet and the European Commission to the Politburo.

Bukovsky continues:

I am very carefully watching such structures as Europol for example. They will have to police us on 32 kinds of crimes, two of which are particularly worrying. One is called racism, another is called xenophobia. Someone from the British government told us that those who object to uncontrolled immigration from the Third World will be regarded as racist and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes.

If you go through all the structures and features of this emerging European monster you will notice that it more and more resembles the Soviet Union. […] Meanwhile they are introducing more and more ideology. The Soviet Union used to be a state run by ideology. Today’s ideology of the European Union is social-democratic, statist, and a big part of it is also political correctness. I watch very carefully how political correctness spreads and becomes an oppressive ideology.

What Bukovsky says about racism, xenophobia and political correctness couldn’t be more relevant today, as the manufactured migrant crisis engulfs Europe and its countries, dividing people from Spain to Hungary.

Exactly as Bukovsky warned, those who don’t agree with further immigration are now being painted as racist and/or xenophobic, often being referred to as extremists, fascists or neo-Nazis. There is little in the way of rational discourse of the full implication of increased immigration; instead mainstream media and politicians are quick to scaremonger about the ‘dangers of the extreme right’.

EUSSR Flag with Masonic Compass and UN Olive BranchesBeyond the particulars of racism and xenophobia, broader ‘hate speech’ laws are being adopted by individual countries. Such laws are open to vastly different levels of interpretation and take no account of religious belief or informed understanding and are, therefore, open to misuse and abuse. Given the increasing number of hate speech laws in recent years, it’s highly likely the number of such laws, and/or the articles within such laws, will only continue to increase until every conceivable slight is covered. At which point absurdity will not only have been reached, it will be maxed out.

In response to Angela Merkel’s admonition in September 2015 regarding anti-migrant posts on Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg agreed to develop a policy for censoring such posts. In January 2016 Facebook launched the Online Civil Courage Initiative, headed up by Jewish-German ex-Stasi agent, Anetta Kahane who, in 1998, founded Amadeu Antonio Stiftung as a “response to the neo-Nazi subculture that permeates former East Germany and has crept into former West [Germany].” AAS funders include the Ford Foundation and Soros’ Open Society Foundations. George Soros (Hungarian-American-Jewish) was a major funder of colour revolutions and the Arab Spring.

When Kahane was interviewed on Russia Today in 2010 this is what she had to say about immigration in Europe:

Immigration is the future. You cannot work and live in a globalised world — in the middle of the world, in Europe — without immigration and moving populations. So you have to really make a good policy of immigration all over Europe. And we see that the history of Europe with its long history of nationalism and small countries is now getting into a crisis, so this will take a long time to make it better but you have to really change the policy of immigration inside Europe. This is very important, you have to adapt the educational system and adapt all the self-understanding of the States. They are not any more only white or only Swedish or only Portuguese or only German. They are multicultural places in the world.

Today’s multi-ethnic European cities are a growing reflection of the following passage from Kalergi’s 1925 book, Praktischer Idealismus:

The man of the future will be a mongrel. Today’s races and classes will disappear owing to the disappearing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its outward appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

Whether or not Kalergi was advocating for miscegenation or merely suggesting it as an inevitability is not clear from the few available excerpts translated into English, but at this stage of the European game his intentions are irrelevant for the essence has been grasped and thrust upon a largely unsuspecting populace through the current EU policy on migration.

In 1999, General Wesley Clark (of Belarusian-Jewish descent), Supreme Allied Commander Europe of NATO (1997-2000), is quoted as saying:

There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. That’s a 19th-century idea and we are trying to transition it into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.

Further, in a September 2008 speech, Nicolas Sarkozy (of Greek-Jewish descent), talked of the necessity of miscegenation:

The goal is to meet the challenge of racial interbreeding. The challenge of racial interbreeding that faces us in the 20th century. It’s not a choice, it’s an obligation. It’s imperative. We cannot do otherwise. We risk finding ourselves confronted with major problems. We must change — therefore we will change. All at the same time. In business, in administration, in education, in the political parties. And we will obligate ourselves as to results. If this volunteerism does not work for the Republic then the State will move to still more coercive measures.

This astounding Sarkozy quote begs the question: Who is setting the goal for racial interbreeding? Perhaps Barbara Lerner Spectre, American-Jewish founder of Paideia (the European Institute for Jewish Studies in Sweden) has the answer:

I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Should Spectre so desire, she can return to her ‘homeland’, Israel, which strongly defends its own borders while forbidding intermarriage between Jews and non-Jews. In 2012, Benjamin Netanyahu said that the “phenomenon of illegal infiltrators from Africa is extremely serious and threatens Israel’s social fabric and national security”.

In juxtaposition with Spectre’s above statement, here are some enlightening words from Kalergi’s Praktischer Idealismus:

Insofar as Europe is Christian, it is in a spiritual sense Jewish, insofar as Europe is moral, it is Jewish. […] Now we stand at the threshold of the third epoch of the new times: Socialism. […] This development, and with it the chaos of modern politics will only then find its end, when a spiritual aristocracy seizes the means of power of society: [gun] powder, gold, ink, and use them for the blessing of the general public.

If one looks long enough and hard enough, one will see that Kalergi’s so-called moral and spiritual aristocracy has, indeed, seized power and is hard at work on both consolidating the socialist third epoch and replacing ethnic Europeans through migration and miscegenation.

Due to sustained brainwashing over the past 70 years, many folk still resist connecting the dots and refuse to see the picture that emerges, but the reality is the very Jews who Kalergi held aloft not only supported and funded his initiatives, but also hold a disproportionate number of powerful and influential positions, within the European Union and its member countries today. These positions are not only official ones at the EU and national government level, but also culturally influential ones, such as within the news media, television, the movie industry, the music industry, and so on.

Societal, cultural and economic change is being imposed through legislation, regulations, policy directives, lobby groups and think tanks, all of which are supported by the media, which also propagates sanctioned thought (ink), economies are being manipulated through central banks and the stock exchange (gold), and our inalienable rights are being subjugated through an ever increasing number of tyrannical laws, backed up by force (gun powder) or the mere threat of force, which for the majority of people is all that’s required to ensure compliance.

Europe today would be largely unrecognisable to Hemingway. What we have gained with open borders we have lost in individual freedoms as more and more aspects of our lives are subjected to taxation, regulation, surveillance and political correctness. The heterogeneity of our national cultures and populations is being progressively homogenised. EU business compliance regulations and economic policies, combined with globalisation, are massively impacting businesses and economies with many businesses, especially small businesses that have to pay high certification fees, struggling to survive. Meanwhile city centres increasingly house the same chain stores and coffee shops. Mass immigration, combined with ‘replacement migration’, is rapidly changing the face of Europe as ethnic Europeans become a minority in major European cities.

Ten, twenty, thirty years from now what will life be like in Europe?

Given the European Union juggernaut will continue to roll, creating ever more regulations and allowing many more migrants to live and work within its borders, the outcome shouldn’t be much of a surprise. In true serpentine fashion, the Hydra that is the European Union will suffocate what once defined Europe: sovereignty of nations, and a diversity of free peoples and culture.


Mufidah Kassalias is co-founder of GLARING Hypocrisy. She learned to connect dots at a young age when she mastered the Rubik’s Cube without instruction. In 2010 she unplugged her television and freed herself from brainwashing. As a result, she now sees dots everywhere and connects them in writing.



INTERVIEW: Bilderberg Criminal Hypocrisy

In this interview Alex Jones exalts Charlie Skelton when he is a traitor who works for the Birtish rag “The Guardian” (truly a mouthpiece of the “globalists” and their agenda).  He ‘appears’ to report from the secret Bilderberg meetings, and what he is actually doing is ‘brainwashing’ people by saying that Bilderberg is recognizing being secretive and that this is ‘a good thing.’  It is not a good thing whatsoever!! 

This all means that they are confident with their actions and are carrying on because no one stops them!!  The message here is the following: the masses are already brainwashed enough so Bilderberg can come out and publicly admit they decide our fate behind closed doors. 

If we still live under a democratic system, Bilderberg is a secret meeting with top politicians and journalists who should have access and be able to report exactly on what is being discussed in secret. This is NOT acceptable as it is. And no one should consent to this absurdity.


VIDEO: Bilderberg Fears The Precariat, the Monster They Created

According to MacMillian Dictionary, the precariat is a social group consisting of people whose lives are difficult because they have little or no job security and few employment rights. Precariat is a blend of adjective precarious and noun proletariat, a word used to describe working-class people as a social group. Proletariat has its origins in Latin proletarius, which denoted a person who had no wealth in property and whose only way of serving the state was by producing offspring. 

Bilderberg seems ‘concerned’ about this social group that they have themselves created thanks to their greed and economic measures. The masters will have to decide what to do with the revolting masses who will become more and more violent and dangerous as world economy sinks.


COMMENTARY: Uh-Oh – Trump To Meet With Kissinger For Foreign Policy Advice


The Washington Post reports that presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump is to meet with Bilderberg kingpin Henry Kissinger this week in order to tap his ‘expertise’ on foreign policy.

Sources close to Trump told reporters that the two will discuss all aspects of foreign policy, but will particularly focus on China.

The post reports:

Meeting with Kissinger has become a rite of passage for many ambitious Republicans, especially those who land on the party’s presidential ticket. Sarah Palin had a high-profile meeting with him in 2008 when she became the GOP vice-presidential nominee, seeking his counsel and association with his credentials.

The face-to-face session comes after weeks of phone conversations between Trump and Kissinger, who was a top adviser to presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. The people close to Trump spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss his private schedule and his relationship with the 92-year-old former diplomat.

The move by Trump’s campaign is a strange one, given that he has been billed as the ultimate anti-establishment outsider, and Kissinger is the biggest Washington insider there is.

The report also suggests that while Trump has denounced globalism as a “false song,” he is beginning to lean toward a more realist view of international affairs, a la Kissinger.

“Trump’s conferring with Kissinger underscores not only how he is building relationships with Republican elders but how he leans toward a more realist view of international affairs.” the report states.

The report also notes that Trump has been meeting with James A. Baker III, another former Republican secretary of state, and consummate insider, under the Bushes.

Baker was vocal in his criticism of Trump’s foreign policy proposals, particularly his call to abolish NATO.

Are these elitist insiders attempting to co-opt Trump’s campaign and exert their globalist ideals upon his outlook?

It will be interesting to keep tabs on Trump’s whereabouts next month, and whether he decides a trip to Dresden Germany, the site of the annual Bilderberg confab, might be a good idea.

In recent times, Kissinger has hinted that he would like to see Hillary Clinton as the next President.

Hillary has previously cited the approval of the Bilderberg Steering Committee member to defend her record as Secretary of State. Last year, Hillary praised Kissinger In a review for his book, “World Order.” Clinton referred to the kingpin’s “compelling case” for building a global architecture.

Writing for the Washington Post, Clinton fawned over Kissinger’s lifelong work, arguing that “no viable alternative” for the future remains.

“Henry Kissinger’s book makes a compelling case for why we have to do it and how we can succeed,” Clinton wrote.

According to Clinton, President Obama and herself have long worked toward fulfilling the same strategy as Kissinger.

“His analysis, despite some differences over specific policies, largely fits with the broad strategy behind the Obama administration’s effort over the past six years to build a global architecture of security and cooperation for the 21st century,” she said.

During the Democratic debates, Clinton’s rival Bernie Sanders highlighted her ties to Kissinger as a way of promoting his own anti-establishment credentials.

“I happen to believe that Henry Kissinger was one of the most destructive secretaries of state in the modern history of this country,” Sanders said. “I am proud to say that Henry Kissinger is not my friend. I will not take advice from Henry Kissinger.”

Sanders noted that Kissinger paved the way for one of the worst instances of genocide in modern history when he oversaw the carpet bombing of Cambodia and subsequent ground incursion, allowing the Communist Chinese-backed Khmer Rouge to gain power.

“Count me in as someone who will not be listening to Henry Kissinger,” Sanders told viewers.



VIDEO: ‘Pentagon May Execute Kissinger Strategy’

It seems the Pentagon is planning to implement former US Secretary of State and National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger’s strategy of world domination, says Don DeBar, an American journalist and political commentator.

DeBar made the remarks while commenting to Press TV on Wednesday, after US Defense Secretary Ashton Carter presented Kissinger with the Department of Defense Distinguished Public Service Award, the Pentagon’s highest honorary award for private citizens and foreign nationals.

Kissinger, 92, served as national security advisor and also as secretary of state to former Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford and as a consultant to Washington throughout his career.

The award citation credits Kissinger with “orchestrating countless foreign policy victories.”

“The idea that Henry Kissinger would receive an award from the Pentagon … is not a surprise to me nor it is a surprise that it would happen under President Obama,” DeBar said.

“Kissinger is a war criminal by any definition of the term, and the Pentagon is the preeminent threat to peace on the planet,” he noted.

DeBar stated the Obama administration has been one of the major threats to world peace in the post-war period. “Look at Libya, Syria, much of Africa, threats against Russia and China. We are closer to a world war than we have been since 1962.”

Former US President Richard Nixon (left) and his “central and influential” national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, in 1972.

The journalist said Kissinger “was responsible for the deaths of perhaps a million people in Vietnam alone, the horrible coup that took place in Chile resulted into  thousands of people being murdered and decades of darkness essentially descended on that country, and footprints like that across the world.”

“It’s like they’re birds of a feather,” DeBar said.

“Ashton Carter saying that Kissinger’s ‘contributions are far from complete’ just tells me that’s he’s, like, implementing Kissinger’s strategy, which is essentially of world domination and destruction,” the analyst observed.

During the award ceremony, Carter said on Monday that while Kissinger’s “contributions are far from complete, we are now beginning to appreciate what his service has provided our country, how it has changed the way we think about strategy and how he has helped provide greater security for our citizens and people around the world”.




COMMENTARY: Secret Connections – Russia and The Banking Cartel



“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure–one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”  – David Rockefeller (Memoirs, pg. 405)

A few of the companies majority owned by the Rockefellers

The Rockefellers financed the creation of the CFR.

David Rockefeller was the US founding member of the Bilderberg Group.

Rockefeller, Ford, and Carnegie Foundations device plot to merge US with Russia. Plot is exposed by Norman Dodd.

The Carnegie Endowment has a main office in Moscow.

Chubais is on the CFR global board of advisers, the Chase Bank advisory board. and a member of Bilderberg. He also worked with the CIA to implement privatization of the Russian economy.

Peter Mandelson is a member of the secretive Bilderberg Group. Baron Mandelson has also been appointed “life peer” in the House of Lords by Queen Elizabeth. Mandelson is the director of the Russian defense firm Sistema, which supplies Putin with early warning missile systems. This relationship continues despite “sanctions.”

Russian gov. owned Rosneft in business with Rockefeller run Exxon and BP despite “sanctions.”

The Putin Government and Chubais are joint owners of RUSNANO.

In 2012, Rothschild Capital Partners bought a 37 percent stake in the Rockefeller’s wealth advisory and asset management group.

Rothschild run Glencore and the Putin Government joined forces to create the world’s largest aluminum company, RUSAL.

The Rothschild Global Financial Advisory is located in downtown Moscow and their website brags of “high-level political access” to the Russian government.

Deripaska is CEO of RUSAL.

Abramovich is Putin’s close confidant, and a joint shareholder along with the Russian government in assets such as Gazprom, Aeroflot, and RUSAL.

Putin selected close friend Oleg Deripaska to represent Russia in ABAC (APEC Business Advisory Council). Deripaska is also a close friends and RUSAL business partners with Roman Abramovich.

The Rothschild family are majority shareholders of Rio Tinto. RUSAL and Rio Tinto are involved in joint mining operations despite so-called “sanctions” imposed by the West.

The Rothschild family are majority shareholders of Rio Tinto. RUSAL and Rio Tinto are involved in joint mining operations despite so-called “sanctions” imposed by the West.

Nat Rothschild is a fellow RUSAL investor, and best friends of Roman Abramovich.Nat is also close friends, and RUSAL business partners with Oleg Deripaska.

Peter Mandelson is a business partner and close personal friend of Nat Rothschild.

Sir Evelyn Robert de Rothschild has been knighted by Queen Elizabeth and is also her financial adviser.

The Rothschild family administers the Rhodes Scholarship for their deceased family friend, Cecil Rhodes. All Rhodes Scholars are personally hand picked by the Rothschilds.

Rachel Maddow is a famous Rhodes Scholar.

MSNBC is a mass media outlet with Rothschild connections.



Kill Trump

COMMENTARY: GOP, Corporate Executives, Big Donors Meet Behind Closed Doors, to Take Down Trump

Top legislators, including United States House of Representatives Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wisc.), met secretly with corporate heads, neoconservative Weekly Standard editor William Kristol, political strategist Karl Christian Rove, and several billionaire GOP donors off the Georgia coast on March 3-6. The chief focus of the strategy session: how to stop billionaire candidate Donald J. Trump from getting the GOP presidential nomination.

Kill Trump

And a tip from an alert AMERICAN FREE PRESS reader and a leaked account that appeared on the Global Research news website revealed that this particular “World Forum,” as the annual meeting is called, was even closed to reporters.

The forum was held on Sea Island by the neoconservative, pro-war American Enterprise Institute (AEI). Sea Island is part of a group of islands, formally called the Golden Isles, which includes Jekyll Island, where in 1910 Senator Nelson Aldrich of Rhode Island conspired with bankers, dressed as duck hunters, to lay the groundwork for what became the privately owned and controlled Federal Reserve System.

Several leaders in the technology industry, such as Apple Inc.’s Tim Cook, were on the island, which is curious since Cook is reportedly fencing with the federal government on whether to unlock Apple users’ private data for the government in its so-called war on terror. Trump did call for a boycott of Apple, recently, for its refusal to provide the feds with the key to accessing data on its iPhone.

Senate Majority Leader Addison Mitchell “Mitch” McConnell Jr.(Ky.) was also present. And along with Ryan, the House was represented on the island by Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Frederick Stephen “Fred” Upton (R-Mich.), Budget Committee Chairman Thomas Edmunds Price, M.D. (R-Ga.) and Banking Committee Chairman Thomas “Jeb” Hensarling (R-Texas), among other Republican legislators who hold key positions.

Liberal New York Times publisher Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr. was reportedly there as well, cavorting with a bunch of self-proclaimed “conservatives.” Sulzberger took part without arranging to report about the island getaway, reminiscent of the media’s role at the super-secret annual Bilderberg meetings.

So, leading members of Congress colluded with corporate entities and with the head of the nation’s “newspaper of record,” offering them an opportunity to lobby behind closed doors. One question on people’s minds is: Are they trying to sidestep the will of the voters?

Also, will the Republican Party really have an honest and open election system under the Constitution, or is this more evidence of a shadow government where closed-door conferences override the people and advance the goals of the wealthy elites?

According to some recent reports, Rove has been entertaining bringing Mitt Romney out of storage to run him—again—for the GOP nomination. If certain lost souls among the GOP would want to put fresh makeup on the starchy former Massachusetts governor for another try, then the Republican Party’s desperation has reached a whole new low.

Kristol noted on Twitter that the AEI meeting was off the record. However, some accounts claimed that the Israel-first editor went so far as to remark in his “Kristol Clear” commentary March 7 under the Weekly Standard banner: “The key task now, to once again paraphrase Karl Marx, is less to understand Trump than to stop him. In general, there’s a little too much hand-wringing . . . and fatalism out there and not quite enough resolving to save the party from nominating or the country electing someone who simply shouldn’t be president.”

Interestingly, the private AEI World Forum, which has been taking place 1982 and saw former U.S. President Gerald R. Ford as one of its founders, is off the record and to some extent mirrors the above-noted highly exclusive Bilderberg meetings which have taken place nearly every year since 1954 in Europe and North America. Elected and appointed U.S. officials attending the AEI, just like at Bilderberg, meet “off the grid” to discuss policy plans with U.S-based corporate heads and with foreign officials and foreign business interests.

Although Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, mentions that “the World Forum consists of plenary sessions, topical small-group discussion sessions, informal conversational time, and recreational activities”—while regularly meeting every summer in Beaver Creek, Colorado—the Vail Valley Foundation was quoted by Wikipedia as saying: “Senior U.S. cabinet officers and legislators provide candid briefings on important policy initiatives. Heads of major international corporations discuss business and financial developments. Government officials from Europe, Asia and the Americas debate international strategic and economic issues in a private, informal atmosphere, far removed from the distractions of day-to-day business.”

So, the AEI’s extra emergency spring forum on Sea Island was all-the-more significant, especially considering that this meeting took place in tandem with the March 2-5 Conservative Political Action Conference in nearby National Harbor, Maryland. Certain neoconservative figures such as Kristol evidently moved from one event to the other, while spouting anti-Trump rhetoric and tactics. Kristol’s boss, Weekly Standard executive editor Fred Barnes, told the massive CPAC crowd in a panel discussion that, supposedly, some of his upper-tier Republican pals would rather vote for Hillary Clinton than Trump, and that some of them hoped for another GOP candidate to eclipse Trump.


Mark Anderson covers the annual Bilderberg meetings and is chairman of AFP’s new America First Action Committee, designed to involve AFP readers in focusing intensely on Congress to enact key changes, including monetary reform and a pullback of the warfare state. He and his wife Angie often work together on news projects.